The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Landslide susceptibility modelling using GIS-based machine learning techniques for Chongren County, Jiangxi Province, China
Open accessAbstract
The preparation of a landslide susceptibility map is considered to be the first step for landslide hazard mitigation and risk assessment. However, these maps are accepted as end products that can be used for land use planning. The main goal of this study is to assess and compare four advanced machine learning techniques, namely the Bayes' net (BN), radical basis function (RBF) classifier, logistic model tree (LMT), and random forest (RF) models, for landslide susceptibility modelling in Chongren County, China. A total of 222 landslide locations were identified in the study area using historical reports, interpretation of aerial photographs, and extensive field surveys. The landslide inventory data was randomly split into two groups with a ratio of 70/30 for training and validation purposes. Fifteen landslide conditioning factors were prepared for landslide susceptibility modelling. The spatial correlation between landslides and conditioning factors was analyzed using the information gain (IG) method. The BN, RBF classifier, LMT, and RF models were constructed using the training dataset. Finally, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and statistical measures, including sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, were employed to validate and compare the predictive capabilities of the models. Out of the tested models, the RF model had the highest sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values of 0.787, 0.716, and 0.752, respectively, for the training dataset. Overall, the RF model produced an optimized balance for the training and validation datasets in terms of AUC values and statistical measures. The results of this study also demonstrate the benefit of selecting optimal machine learning techniques with proper conditioning selection methods for landslide susceptibility modelling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques
(2011) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-19715-5 · Cited by 25,437
Quinlan, J. R. (1986) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00116251 · Cited by 21,439
The WEKA data mining software: an update
Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., & Witten, I. H. (2009) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/1656274.1656278 · Cited by 17,750
Tien Bui, D., Tuan, T. A., Klempe, H., Pradhan, B., & Revhaug, I. (2016) · Landslides · doi:10.1007/s10346-015-0557-6 · Cited by 1,253
Self-citationEstimating the quality of landslide susceptibility models
Guzzetti, F., Reichenbach, P., Ardizzone, F., Cardinali, M., & Galli, M. (2006) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.04.007 · Cited by 935
Chen, W., Xie, X., Wang, J., Pradhan, B., Hong, H., Bui, D. T., Duan, Z., & Ma, J. (2017) · CATENA · doi:10.1016/j.catena.2016.11.032 · Cited by 930
Self-citationLandslide susceptibility estimation by random forests technique: sensitivity and scaling issues
Catani, F., Lagomarsino, D., Segoni, S., & Tofani, V. (2013) · Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/nhess-13-2815-2013 · Cited by 695
Hunt, E. B., Marin, J., & Stone, P. J. (1966) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 691
Simon, H. A., Hunt, E. B., Marin, J., & Stone, P. (1967) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421207 · Cited by 659
Cited by
Nguyen, Q. H., Ly, H.-B., Ho, L. S., Al-Ansari, N., Le, H. V., Tran, V. Q., Prakash, I., & Pham, B. T. (2021) · Mathematical Problems in Engineering · doi:10.1155/2021/4832864 · Cited by 624
Applications of artificial intelligence for disaster management
Sun, W., Bocchini, P., & Davison, B. D. (2020) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-020-04124-3 · Cited by 491
Huang, F., Zhang, J., Zhou, C., Wang, Y., Huang, J., & Zhu, L. (2020) · Landslides · doi:10.1007/s10346-019-01274-9 · Cited by 444
Chen, W., Li, H., Hou, E., Wang, S., Wang, G., Panahi, M., Li, T., Peng, T., Guo, C., Niu, C., et al. (2018) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.055 · Cited by 341
Self-citationMomade, M., Durdyev, S., Estrella, D., & Ismail, S. (2021) · Frontiers in Engineering and Built Environment · doi:10.1108/febe-07-2021-0036 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, W., Peng, J., Hong, H., Shahabi, H., Pradhan, B., Liu, J., Zhu, A.-X., Pei, X., & Duan, Z.
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 626
- Pages
- 1121-1135
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2791665776
- Cited by
- 478
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 78.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Landslide susceptibility modelling using GIS-based machine learning techniques for Chongren County, Jiangxi Province, China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.124
- The paper
- Chen, W., Peng, J., Hong, H., Shahabi, H., Pradhan, B., Liu, J., Zhu, A.-X., Pei, X., & Duan, Z. (2018). Landslide susceptibility modelling using GIS-based machine learning techniques for Chongren County, Jiangxi Province, China. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.124
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.