The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Flood risk assessment in metro systems of mega-cities using a GIS-based modeling approach
Abstract
Metro system is a vital component of mass transportation infrastructure, providing crucial social and economic service in urban area. Flood events may cause functional disruptions to metro systems; therefore, a better understanding of their vulnerability would enhance their resilience. A comparative study of flood risk in metro systems is presented using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the interval AHP (I-AHP) methods. The flood risk in the Guangzhou metro system is evaluated according to recorded data. Evaluated results are validated using the flood event occurred in Guangzhou on May 10, 2016 (hereinafter called "May 10th event"), which inundated several metro stations. The flood risk is assessed within a range of 500 m around the metro line. The results show that >50% of metro lines are highly exposed to flood risk, indicating that the Guangzhou metro system is vulnerable to flood events. Comparisons between results from AHP and I-AHP show that the latter yields a wider range of high flooding risk than the former.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures
Saaty, T. L. (1977) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5 · Cited by 10,360
Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process
Saaty, T. L. (2008) · International Journal of Services Sciences · doi:10.1504/ijssci.2008.017590 · Cited by 10,301
A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory
van Laarhoven, P. J. M., & Pedrycz, W. (1983) · Fuzzy Sets and Systems · doi:10.1016/s0165-0114(83)80082-7 · Cited by 3,045
Kazakis, N., Kougias, I., & Patsialis, T. (2015) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.055 · Cited by 650
Stefanidis, S., & Stathis, D. (2013) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-013-0639-5 · Cited by 430
Suarez, P., Anderson, W., Mahal, V., & Lakshmanan, T. R. (2005) · Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2005.04.007 · Cited by 357
Effect of acid rain pH on leaching behavior of cement stabilized lead-contaminated soil
Du, Y., Wei, M.-L., Reddy, K. R., Liu, Z.-P., & Jin, F. (2014) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.02.002 · Cited by 313
Yin, Z., Jin, Y., Shen, J. S., & Hicher, P. (2018) · International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics · doi:10.1002/nag.2714 · Cited by 282
Chen, Y.-R., Yeh, C.-H., & Yu, B. (2011) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-011-9831-7 · Cited by 236
Sadiq, R., & Tesfamariam, S. (2009) · Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment · doi:10.1007/s00477-007-0197-z · Cited by 200
Cited by
Perspectives for flood risk assessment and management for mega-city metro system
Lyu, H.-M., Shen, S.-L., Zhou, A., & Yang, J. (2019) · Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tust.2018.10.019 · Cited by 312
Self-citationKanani-Sadat, Y., Arabsheibani, R., Karimipour, F., & Nasseri, M. (2019) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.02.034 · Cited by 194
Metadata
- Authors
- Lyu, H.-M., Sun, W.-J., Shen, S.-L., & Arulrajah, A.
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 626
- Pages
- 1012-1025
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2790785337
- Cited by
- 445
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 26.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flood risk assessment in metro systems of mega-cities using a GIS-based modeling approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.138
- The paper
- Lyu, H.-M., Sun, W.-J., Shen, S.-L., & Arulrajah, A. (2018). Flood risk assessment in metro systems of mega-cities using a GIS-based modeling approach. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.138
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
