The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Assessment of flood hazard areas at a regional scale using an index-based approach and Analytical Hierarchy Process: Application in Rhodope–Evros region, Greece
Open accessAbstract
The present study introduces a multi-criteria index to assess flood hazard areas in a regional scale. Accordingly, a Flood Hazard Index (FHI) has been defined and a spatial analysis in a GIS environment has been applied for the estimation of its value. The developed methodology processes information of seven parameters namely flow accumulation, distance from the drainage network, elevation, land use, rainfall intensity and geology. The initials of these criteria gave the name to the developed method: "FIGUSED". The relative importance of each parameter for the occurrence and severity of flood has been connected to weight values. These values are calculated following an "Analytical Hierarchy Process", a method originally developed for the solution of Operational Research problems. According to their weight values, information of the different parameters is superimposed, resulting to flood hazard mapping. The accuracy of the method has been supported by a sensitivity analysis that examines a range for the weights' values and corresponding to alternative scenarios. The presented methodology has been applied to an area in north-eastern Greece, where recurring flood events have appeared. Initially FIGUSED method resulted to a Flood Hazard Index (FHI) and a corresponding flood map. A sensitivity analysis on the parameters' values revealed some interesting information on the relative importance of each criterion, presented and commented in the Discussion section. Moreover, the sensitivity analysis concluded to a revised index FHIS (methodology named FIGUSED-S) and flood mapping, supporting the robustness of FIGUSED methodology. A comparison of the outcome with records of historical flood events confirmed that the proposed methodology provides valid results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Health hazards of hexavalent chromium (Cr (VI)) and its microbial reduction
Sharma, P., Singh, S. P., Parakh, S. K., & Tong, Y. W. (2022) · Bioengineered · doi:10.1080/21655979.2022.2037273 · Cited by 694
Khosravi, K., Nohani, E., Maroufinia, E., & Pourghasemi, H. R. (2016) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-016-2357-2 · Cited by 528
Flood risk assessment in metro systems of mega-cities using a GIS-based modeling approach
Lyu, H.-M., Sun, W.-J., Shen, S.-L., & Arulrajah, A. (2018) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.138 · Cited by 445
Mapping flood susceptibility in mountainous areas on a national scale in China
Zhao, G., Pang, B., Xu, Z., Yue, J., & Tu, T. (2018) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.037 · Cited by 389
Application of GIS-Interval Rough AHP Methodology for Flood Hazard Mapping in Urban Areas
Gigović, L., Pamučar, D., Bajić, Z., & Drobnjak, S. (2017) · Water · doi:10.3390/w9060360 · Cited by 341
Metadata
- Authors
- Kazakis, N., Kougias, I., & Patsialis, T.
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 538
- Pages
- 555-563
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1186112364
- Cited by
- 650
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of flood hazard areas at a regional scale using an index-based approach and Analytical Hierarchy Process: Application in Rhodope–Evros region, Greece. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.055
- The paper
- Kazakis, N., Kougias, I., & Patsialis, T. (2015). Assessment of flood hazard areas at a regional scale using an index-based approach and Analytical Hierarchy Process: Application in Rhodope–Evros region, Greece. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.055
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.