The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effect of biochar feedstock, pyrolysis temperature, and application rate on the reduction of ammonia volatilisation from biochar-amended soil
Abstract
Ammonia (NH 3) volatilisation is one of the most important causes of nitrogen (N) loss in soil-plant systems worldwide. Carbon-based amendments such as biochar have been shown to mitigate NH 3 volatilisation in agricultural soils to various degrees. In this study, we investigated the influence of biochar feedstocks (poultry manure, green waste compost, and wheat straw), pyrolysis temperatures (250, 350, 450, 500 and 700°C) and application rates (1 and 2%), on NH 3 volatilisation from a calcareous soil. The 15 biochars were chemically characterized, and a laboratory incubation study was conducted to assess NH 3 volatilisation from the soil over a period of four weeks. Furthermore, changes to the bacterial and fungal communities were assessed via sequencing of phylogenetic marker genes. The study showed that biochar feedstock sources, pyrolysis temperature, and application rates all affected NH 3 volatilisation. Overall, low pyrolysis temperature biochars and higher biochar application rates achieved greater reductions in NH 3 volatilisation. A feedstock related effect was also observed, with poultry manure biochar reducing NH 3 volatilisation by an average of 53% in comparison to 38% and 35% reductions for biochar from green waste compost and wheat straw respectively. Results indicate that the biogeochemistry underlying biochar-mediated reduction in NH 3 volatilisation is complex and caused by changes in soil pH, NH 3 sorption and microbial community composition (especially ammonia oxidising guilds).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Biochar application can also effectively absorb ammonia (NH 3 ), reducing its loss through volatilization (Mandal et al., 2018;Stavi and Lal, 2013).”
From Biochar implications for sustainable agriculture and environment: A review (2019) · cites this paper as Mandal et al., 2018
In the citing paper
“These changes in soil properties are likely to impact nutrient reactions on soil particles and microbial transformation of nutrients (Mandal et al. 2018).”
From Biochar and its importance on nutrient dynamics in soil and plant (2020) · cites this paper as Mandal et al. 2018
In the citing paper
“However, the loss of N through ammonia emission depends mainly on the pH of the biochar; biochar with a slightly acidic or near-neutral pH reduce ammonia volatilization from soil (Mandal et al. 2019;Mandal et al. 2018).”
From Biochar and its importance on nutrient dynamics in soil and plant (2020) · cites this paper as Mandal et al. 2018
In the citing paper
“The resultant soil pH values tended to move to the alkaline side when the soil received an increased biochar application rate, and when the biochar was produced at a high temperature (e.g., 700 °C) (Mandal et al., 2016b; 2018).”
From A review on biochar modulated soil condition improvements and nutrient dynamics concerning crop yields: Pathways to climate change mitigation and global food security (2019) · cites this paper as Mandal et al., 2018
In the citing paper
“The resultant soil pH values tended to move to the alkaline side when the soil received an increased biochar application rate, and when the biochar was produced at a high temperature (e.g., 700 °C) (Mandal et al., 2016b; 2018).”
From A review on biochar modulated soil condition improvements and nutrient dynamics concerning crop yields: Pathways to climate change mitigation and global food security (2019) · cites this paper as Mandal et al., 2018
In the citing paper
“Similarly, Mandal et al. (2018) reported that when biochars produced from poultry manure, green waste compost and wheat straw at various temperatures (250 - 700 °C) were applied to an alkaline soil (pH 8.01), they could modify the soil pH values by about 0.84 units in both directions ranging from pH 7.37 to 8.23.”
From A review on biochar modulated soil condition improvements and nutrient dynamics concerning crop yields: Pathways to climate change mitigation and global food security (2019) · cites this paper as Mandal et al., 2018
In the citing paper
“Biochar being rich in surface functional groups, including aromatic moieties, can alter cation and anion exchange capacities of soils, which further influences N retention (Clough et al., 2013; Slavich et al., 2013; Mandal et al., 2018).”
From A review on biochar modulated soil condition improvements and nutrient dynamics concerning crop yields: Pathways to climate change mitigation and global food security (2019) · cites this paper as Mandal et al., 2018
Citations
Cites
Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics
White, T. J., Bruns, T., Lee, S., & Taylor, J. (1990) · PCR Protocols · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1 · Cited by 36,648
vegan: Community Ecology Package
Oksanen, J., Simpson, G. L., Blanchet, F. G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P. R., O’Hara, R. B., Sólymos, P., Stevens, M. H. H., Szöcs, E., et al. (2001) · doi:10.32614/cran.package.vegan · Cited by 27,099
Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric Models
Hothorn, T., Bretz, F., & Westfall, P. H. (2008) · Biometrical Journal · doi:10.1002/bimj.200810425 · Cited by 14,265
nlme : Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models
DebRoy, S. (2006) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,009
Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms
Caporaso, J. G., Lauber, C. L., Walters, W. A., Berg-Lyons, D., Huntley, J., Fierer, N., Owens, S. M., Betley, J., Fraser, L., Bauer, M., et al. (2012) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2012.8 · Cited by 8,839
Methods of soil analysis. Part 3 - chemical methods.
Sparks, D. L., Page, A. L., Helmke, P. A., Loeppert, R. H., Soltanpour, P. N., Tabatabai, M. A., Johnston, C. T., & Sumner, M. E. (1996) · Cited by 8,502
nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models
Pinheiro, J., R Core Team, & Bates, D. (1999) · doi:10.32614/cran.package.nlme · Cited by 6,867
Vegan : community ecology package. R package version 1.17-9
Oksanen, J. (2007) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 6,549
Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data
Legendre, P., & Gallagher, E. D. (2001) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s004420100716 · Cited by 5,556
Biochar effects on soil biota – A review
Lehmann, J., Rillig, M. C., Thies, J., Masiello, C. A., Hockaday, W. C., & Crowley, D. (2011) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.022 · Cited by 5,074
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Downie, 2009, Physical properties of biochar. Biochar for environmental management, Sci. Technol., 13
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Biochar and its importance on nutrient dynamics in soil and plant
Hossain, M. Z., Bahar, M. M., Sarkar, B., Donne, S. W., Ok, Y. S., Palansooriya, K. N., Kirkham, M. B., Chowdhury, S., & Bolan, N. (2020) · Biochar · doi:10.1007/s42773-020-00065-z · Cited by 904
Zhang, X., Zhang, P., Yuan, X., Li, Y., & Han, L. (2019) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122318 · Cited by 473
Purakayastha, T. J., Bera, T., Bhaduri, D., Sarkar, B., Mandal, S., Wade, P., Kumari, S., Biswas, S., Menon, M., Pathak, H., et al. (2019) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.03.170 · Cited by 379
Self-citationHailegnaw, N. S., Mercl, F., Pračke, K., Száková, J., & Tlustoš, P. (2019) · Journal of Soils and Sediments · doi:10.1007/s11368-019-02264-z · Cited by 293
Utilization of biochar for the removal of nitrogen and phosphorus
Dai, Y., Wang, W., Lu, L., Yan, L., & Yu, D. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120573 · Cited by 298
Metadata
- Authors
- Mandal, S., Donner, E., Vasileiadis, S., Skinner, W., Smith, E., & Lombi, E.
- Affiliations
- University of South Australia (AU)
- University of Thessaly (GR)
- Corresponding author
- Mandal, Sanchita
- Lombi, Enzo
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 627
- Pages
- 942-950
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2790123852
- Cited by
- 149
- References
- 77
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 12.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- University of Thessaly Institutional Repository (University of Thessaly) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Department of Education and Training
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
- Keywords
- biochar, ammonia volatilization, nitrogen loss, pyrolysis temperature, biochar feedstock, biochar application rate, green waste compost, wheat straw, calcareous soils, soil microbial communities, ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, soil pH, ammonia sorption, soil amendment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
