The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High resolution mapping of soil organic carbon stocks using remote sensing variables in the semi-arid rangelands of eastern Australia
Abstract
Efficient and effective modelling methods to assess soil organic carbon (SOC) stock are central in understanding the global carbon cycle and informing related land management decisions. However, mapping SOC stocks in semi-arid rangelands is challenging due to the lack of data and poor spatial coverage. The use of remote sensing data to provide an indirect measurement of SOC to inform digital soil mapping has the potential to provide more reliable and cost-effective estimates of SOC compared with field-based, direct measurement. Despite this potential, the role of remote sensing data in improving the knowledge of soil information in semi-arid rangelands has not been fully explored. This study firstly investigated the use of high spatial resolution satellite data (seasonal fractional cover data; SFC) together with elevation, lithology, climatic data and observed soil data to map the spatial distribution of SOC at two soil depths (0-5cm and 0-30cm) in semi-arid rangelands of eastern Australia. Overall, model performance statistics showed that random forest (RF) and boosted regression trees (BRT) models performed better than support vector machine (SVM). The models obtained moderate results with R2 of 0.32 for SOC stock at 0-5cm and 0.44 at 0-30cm, RMSE of 3.51MgCha-1 at 0-5cm and 9.16MgCha-1 at 0-30cm without considering SFC covariates. In contrast, by including SFC, the model accuracy for predicting SOC stock improved by 7.4-12.7% at 0-5cm, and by 2.8-5.9% at 0-30cm, highlighting the importance of including SFC to enhance the performance of the three modelling techniques. Furthermore, our models produced a more accurate and higher resolution digital SOC stock map compared with other available mapping products for the region. The data and high-resolution maps from this study can be used for future soil carbon assessment and monitoring.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
What determines soil organic carbon stocks in the grazing lands of north-eastern Australia?
Allen, D. E., Pringle, M. J., Bray, S., Hall, T. J., O’Reagain, P. O., Phelps, D., Cobon, D. H., Bloesch, P. M., & Dalal, R. C. (2013) · Soil Research · doi:10.1071/sr13041 · Cited by 85
Cited by
Modelling and mapping soil organic carbon stocks in Brazil
Gomes, L. C., Faria, R. M., de Souza, E., Veloso, G. V., Schaefer, C. E. G. R., & Filho, E. I. F. (2019) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.01.007 · Cited by 470
Selecting appropriate machine learning methods for digital soil mapping
Khaledian, Y., & Miller, B. A. (2020) · Applied Mathematical Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.apm.2019.12.016 · Cited by 448
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, B., Waters, C., Orgill, S., Gray, J., Cowie, A., Clark, A., & Liu, D. L.
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-07
- Volume
- 630
- Pages
- 367-378
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2792422161
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High resolution mapping of soil organic carbon stocks using remote sensing variables in the semi-arid rangelands of eastern Australia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.204
- The paper
- Wang, B., Waters, C., Orgill, S., Gray, J., Cowie, A., Clark, A., & Liu, D. L. (2018). High resolution mapping of soil organic carbon stocks using remote sensing variables in the semi-arid rangelands of eastern Australia. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.204
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.