The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Soil health assessment: A critical review of current methodologies and a proposed new approach
Abstract
The wellbeing of soils is crucial for securing food production worldwide. The soil health (SH) concept has been introduced due to an evolving understanding that soil is not just a growing medium for crops but that it provides a foundation for other essential ecosystem services (ES). The SH concept requires development of a holistic index for reliable and quantitative assessment of soil wellbeing related to the effects of different soil management practices and land uses. The aims of this paper are to: (1) review current approaches and methods to assess SH, (2) highlight the role of soil ES in characterizing soil function and (3) propose a new approach to assess SH via monitoring of ES provided by soils. We introduce a brief critical review of the following three main steps required for assessment of common SH indices: (1) selection of relevant attributes; (2) quantification and scoring approaches; and (3) integration of the selected attributes to construct the SH index. These steps usually include statistical or expert opinion-based approaches. In addition, we present a new approach that highlights the relevance and importance of soil ES, i.e., provisioning, regulating and supporting services that must be quantified for comprehensive assessment of soil functions and for fitting models that relate selected soil attributes to ES. This will allow practitioners and scholars to identify the most significant and universal attributes, quantify the relative contribution of each attribute to each ES, and subsequently assess the overall health of soils.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making
Fisher, B., Turner, R. K., & Morling, P. (2009) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014 · Cited by 3,158
GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis
Leake, C., & Malczewski, J. (2000) · The Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.2307/254268 · Cited by 3,032
Soil quality – A critical review
Bünemann, E. K., Bongiorno, G., Bai, Z., Creamer, R. E., De Deyn, G., de Goede, R., Fleskens, L., Geissen, V., Kuyper, T. W., Mäder, P., et al. (2018) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.01.030 · Cited by 2,960
Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies
Power, A. G. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0143 · Cited by 2,334
Soil health and sustainability: managing the biotic component of soil quality
Doran, J. W., & Zeiss, M. R. (2000) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/s0929-1393(00)00067-6 · Cited by 1,971
Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture
Zhang, W., Ricketts, T. H., Kremen, C., Carney, K., & Swinton, S. M. (2007) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.024 · Cited by 1,590
How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration?
Jandl, R., Lindner, M., Vesterdal, L., Bauwens, B., Baritz, R., Hagedorn, F., Johnson, D. W., Minkkinen, K., & Byrne, K. A. (2007) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.09.003 · Cited by 1,458
The Soil Management Assessment Framework: A Quantitative Soil Quality Evaluation Method
Andrews, S. S., Karlen, D. L., & Cambardella, C. A. (2004) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2004.1945 · Cited by 1,341
Feedstocks for Lignocellulosic Biofuels
Somerville, C., Youngs, H., Taylor, C., Davis, S. C., & Long, S. P. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1189268 · Cited by 1,307
Andrews, S. S., Karlen, D. L., & Mitchell, J. P. (2002) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(01)00174-8 · Cited by 1,277
Cited by
Conservation agriculture as a sustainable system for soil health: a review
Cárceles Rodríguez, B., Durán-Zuazo, V. H., Soriano Rodríguez, M., García-Tejero, I. F., Gálvez Ruiz, B., & Cuadros Tavira, S. (2022) · Soil Systems · doi:10.3390/soilsystems6040087 · Cited by 337
Multi-functional assessment of soil health under conservation agriculture in Cambodia
Pheap, S., Lefèvre, C., Thoumazeau, A., Leng, V., Boulakia, S., Koy, R., Hok, L., Lienhard, P., Brauman, A., & Tivet, F. (2019) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/j.still.2019.104349 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Rinot, O., Levy, G. J., Steinberger, Y., Svoray, T., & Eshel, G.
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 648
- Pages
- 1484-1491
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2888683426
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 76
- FWCI
- 18.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soil health assessment: A critical review of current methodologies and a proposed new approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.259
- The paper
- Rinot, O., Levy, G. J., Steinberger, Y., Svoray, T., & Eshel, G. (2019). Soil health assessment: A critical review of current methodologies and a proposed new approach. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.259
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.