The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A comparison of statistical methods and multi-criteria decision making to map flood hazard susceptibility in Northern Iran
Abstract
In north of Iran, flood is one of the most important natural hazards that annually inflict great economic damages on humankind infrastructures and natural ecosystems. The Kiasar watershed is known as one of the critical areas in north of Iran, due to numerous floods and waste of water and soil resources, as well as related economic and ecological losses. However, a comprehensive and systematic research to identify flood-prone areas, which may help to establish management and conservation measures, has not been carried out yet. Therefore, this study tested four methods: evidential belief function (EBF), frequency ratio (FR), Technique for Order Preference by Similarity To ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Vlse Kriterijumsk Optimizacija Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) for flood hazard susceptibility mapping (FHSM) in this area. These were combined in two methodological frameworks involving statistical and multi-criteria decision making approaches. The efficiency of statistical and multi-criteria methods in FHSM were compared by using area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve, seed cell area index and frequency ratio. A database containing flood inventory maps and flood-related conditioning factors was established for this watershed. The flood inventory maps produced included 132 flood conditions, which were randomly classified into two groups, for training (70%) and validation (30%). Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) indicated that slope, distance to stream and land use/land cover are of key importance in flood occurrence in the study catchment. In validation results, the EBF model had a better prediction rate (0.987) and success rate (0.946) than FR, TOPSIS and VIKOR (prediction rate 0.917, 0.888, and 0.810; success rate 0.939, 0.904, and 0.735, respectively). Based on their frequency ratio and seed cell area index values, all models except VIKOR showed acceptable accuracy of classification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Analytic Hierarchy Process
SAATY, T. L., & KEARNS, K. P. (1985) · Analytical Planning · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-032599-6.50008-8 · Cited by 15,357
A Mathematical Theory of Evidence
Shafer, G. (2020) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctv10vm1qb · Cited by 11,711
Measuring the Accuracy of Diagnostic Systems
Swets, J. A. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3287615 · Cited by 10,058
Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications
Chen, S.-J. J., Hwang, C. L., Beckmann, M. J., & Krelle, W. E. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 8,207
GIS‐based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature
Malczewski, J. (2006) · International Journal of Geographical Information Science · doi:10.1080/13658810600661508 · Cited by 2,289
A Generalization of Bayesian Inference
Dempster, A. P. (1968) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1968.tb00722.x · Cited by 2,013
A mathematical theory of evidence
Rota, G. (1977) · Advances in Mathematics · doi:10.1016/0001-8708(77)90069-x · Cited by 1,802
A Generalization of Bayesian Inference
Dempster, A. P. (2008) · Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-44792-4_4 · Cited by 1,702
(2011) · SpringerReference · doi:10.1007/springerreference_5233 · Cited by 1,362
A Review of Risk Perceptions and Other Factors that Influence Flood Mitigation Behavior
Bubeck, P., Botzen, W. J. W., & Aerts, J. C. J. H. (2012) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01783.x · Cited by 1,201
Cited by
Gudiyangada Nachappa, T., Tavakkoli Piralilou, S., Gholamnia, K., Ghorbanzadeh, O., Rahmati, O., & Blaschke, T. (2020) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125275 · Cited by 401
Oral, H. V., Carvalho, P., Gajewska, M., Ursino, N., Masi, F., Hullebusch, E. D. V., Kazak, J. K., Exposito, A., Cipolletta, G., Andersen, T. R., et al. (2020) · Blue-Green Systems · doi:10.2166/bgs.2020.932 · Cited by 375
Flood susceptibility mapping using convolutional neural network frameworks
Wang, Y., Fang, Z., Hong, H., & Peng, L. (2020) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124482 · Cited by 339
Kanani-Sadat, Y., Arabsheibani, R., Karimipour, F., & Nasseri, M. (2019) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.02.034 · Cited by 194
Metadata
- Authors
- Arabameri, A., Rezaei, K., Cerdà, A., Conoscenti, C., & Kalantari, Z.
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 660
- Pages
- 443-458
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2907882001
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 78
- FWCI
- 18.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparison of statistical methods and multi-criteria decision making to map flood hazard susceptibility in Northern Iran. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.021
- The paper
- Arabameri, A., Rezaei, K., Cerdà, A., Conoscenti, C., & Kalantari, Z. (2019). A comparison of statistical methods and multi-criteria decision making to map flood hazard susceptibility in Northern Iran. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.021
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.