The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A hybrid model for spatiotemporal forecasting of PM2.5 based on graph convolutional neural network and long short-term memory
Abstract
Increasing availability of data related to air quality from ground monitoring stations has provided the chance for data mining researchers to propose sophisticated models for predicting the concentrations of different air pollutants. In this paper, we proposed a hybrid model based on deep learning methods that integrates Graph Convolutional networks and Long Short-Term Memory networks (GC-LSTM) to model and forecast the spatiotemporal variation of PM2.5 concentrations. Specifically, historical observations on different stations are constructed as spatiotemporal graph series, and historical air quality variables, meteorological factors, spatial terms and temporal attributes are defined as graph signals. To evaluate the performance of the GC-LSTM, we compared our results with several state-of-the-art methods in different time intervals. Based on the results, our GC-LSTM model achieved the best performance for predictions. Moreover, evaluations of recall rate (68.45%), false alarm rate (4.65%) (both of threshold: 115 μg/m3) and correlation coefficient R2 (0.72) for 72-hour predictions also verify the feasibility of our proposed model. This methodology can be used for concentration forecasting of different air pollutants in future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks
Kipf, T. N., & Welling, M. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1609.02907 · Cited by 24,853
Convolutional LSTM Network: A Machine Learning Approach for Precipitation Nowcasting
Shi, X., Chen, Z., Wang, H., Yeung, D.-Y., Wong, W.-K., & Woo, W.-C. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.04214 · Cited by 7,709
Chung, F. (1996) · CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics · doi:10.1090/cbms/092 · Cited by 5,524
Fully coupled “online” chemistry within the WRF model
Grell, G. A., Peckham, S. E., Schmitz, R., McKeen, S. A., Frost, G., Skamarock, W. C., & Eder, B. (2005) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.04.027 · Cited by 3,748
The MODIS Aerosol Algorithm, Products, and Validation
Remer, L. A., Kaufman, Y. J., Tanré, D., Mattoo, S., Chu, D. A., Martins, J. V., Li, R.-R., Ichoku, C., Levy, R. C., Kleidman, R. G., et al. (2005) · Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences · doi:10.1175/jas3385.1 · Cited by 3,122
Bey, I., Jacob, D. J., Yantosca, R. M., Logan, J. A., Field, B. D., Fiore, A. M., Li, Q., Liu, H. Y., Mickley, L. J., & Schultz, M. G. (2001) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2001jd000807 · Cited by 2,486
Self-citationConvolutional Neural Networks on Graphs with Fast Localized Spectral Filtering
Defferrard, M., Bresson, X., & Vandergheynst, P. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.09375 · Cited by 1,673
Science algorithms of the EPA Models-3 community multi-scale air quality (CMAQ) modeling system
Byun, D. W. (1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 954
A Deep CNN-LSTM Model for Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Forecasting in Smart Cities
Huang, C.-J., & Kuo, P.-H. (2018) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18072220 · Cited by 705
Cited by
A review of artificial neural network models for ambient air pollution prediction
Cabaneros, S. M., Calautit, J. K., & Hughes, B. R. (2019) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.06.014 · Cited by 459
Sagheer, A., & Kotb, M. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-55320-6 · Cited by 351
Subramaniam, S., Raju, N., Ganesan, A., Rajavel, N., Chenniappan, M., Prakash, C., Pramanik, A., Basak, A. K., & Dixit, S. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14169951 · Cited by 193
Optimising Deep Learning at the Edge for Accurate Hourly Air Quality Prediction
Wardana, I. N. K., Gardner, J. W., & Fahmy, S. A. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21041064 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Qi, Y., Li, Q., Karimian, H., & Liu, D.
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-05
- Volume
- 664
- Pages
- 1-10
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2914487400
- Cited by
- 601
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 28.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A hybrid model for spatiotemporal forecasting of PM2.5 based on graph convolutional neural network and long short-term memory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.333
- The paper
- Qi, Y., Li, Q., Karimian, H., & Liu, D. (2019). A hybrid model for spatiotemporal forecasting of PM2.5 based on graph convolutional neural network and long short-term memory. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.333
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.