The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Deep CNN-LSTM Model for Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Forecasting in Smart Cities
Open accessAbstract
In modern society, air pollution is an important topic as this pollution exerts a critically bad influence on human health and the environment. Among air pollutants, Particulate Matter (PM2.5) consists of suspended particles with a diameter equal to or less than 2.5 μm. Sources of PM2.5 can be coal-fired power generation, smoke, or dusts. These suspended particles in the air can damage the respiratory and cardiovascular systems of the human body, which may further lead to other diseases such as asthma, lung cancer, or cardiovascular diseases. To monitor and estimate the PM2.5 concentration, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) are combined and applied to the PM2.5 forecasting system. To compare the overall performance of each algorithm, four measurement indexes, Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) Pearson correlation coefficient and Index of Agreement (IA) are applied to the experiments in this paper. Compared with other machine learning methods, the experimental results showed that the forecasting accuracy of the proposed CNN-LSTM model (APNet) is verified to be the highest in this paper. For the CNN-LSTM model, its feasibility and practicability to forecast the PM2.5 concentration are also verified in this paper. The main contribution of this paper is to develop a deep neural network model that integrates the CNN and LSTM architectures, and through historical data such as cumulated hours of rain, cumulated wind speed and PM2.5 concentration. In the future, this study can also be applied to the prevention and control of PM2.5.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
Ioffe, S., & Szegedy, C. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.03167 · Cited by 27,818
Greff, K., Srivastava, R. K., Koutnik, J., Steunebrink, B. R., & Schmidhuber, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2016.2582924 · Cited by 6,955
Prechelt, L. (1998) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-49430-8_3 · Cited by 1,649
Cited by
Qi, Y., Li, Q., Karimian, H., & Liu, D. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.333 · Cited by 601
A review of artificial neural network models for ambient air pollution prediction
Cabaneros, S. M., Calautit, J. K., & Hughes, B. R. (2019) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.06.014 · Cited by 459
Sagheer, A., & Kotb, M. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-55320-6 · Cited by 351
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, C.-J., & Kuo, P.-H.
- Venue
- Sensors
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2018-07-10
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2220
- ISSN
- 1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2812669263
- Cited by
- 705
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 34.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Deep CNN-LSTM Model for Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Forecasting in Smart Cities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/s18072220
- The paper
- Huang, C.-J., & Kuo, P.-H. (2018). A Deep CNN-LSTM Model for Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Forecasting in Smart Cities. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18072220
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.