The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep learning-based PM2.5 prediction considering the spatiotemporal correlations: A case study of Beijing, China
Abstract
Air pollution is one of the serious environmental problems that humankind faces and also a hot topic in Northeastern Asia. Therefore, the accurate prediction of PM2.5 (particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of ≤2.5 μm) is very significant in the management of human health and the decision-making of government for the environmental management. In this study, a spatiotemporal convolutional neural network (CNN) and long short-term (LSTM) memory (CNN-LSTM) model (also called PM (particulate matter) predictor) was proposed and used to predict the next day's daily average PM2.5 concentration in Beijing City. The spatiotemporal correlation analysis using the mutual information (MI) was performed, considering not only the linear correlation but also nonlinear correlation between target and observation parameters; in addition, it was fully considered for the whole area of China with the target monitoring station as the center and also for the historic air quality and meteorological data. As a result, the spatiotemporal feature vector (STFV) which reflects both linear and nonlinear correlations between parameters was effectively constructed. The PM predictor secured a fast and accurate prediction performance by efficiently extracting the inherent features of the latent air quality and meteorological input data associated with PM2.5 through CNN and by fully reflecting the long-term historic process of input time series data through LSTM. The air quality and meteorological data from the 384 monitoring stations which represents the whole area of China with Beijing City as the center during the 3 years (Jan. 1st, 2015 to Dec. 31th, 2017) were used to verify the validity of the proposed method. In conclusion, the proposed method was proved to have a better stability and prediction performance compared to multi-layer perceptron (MLP) and LSTM models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Machine learning
(2007) · doi:10.1145/1273496 · Cited by 11,630
Learning Deep Architectures for AI
Bengio, Y. (2009) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000006 · Cited by 6,938
A unified architecture for natural language processing: deep neural networks with multitask learning
Collobert, R., & Weston, J. (2008) · Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning - ICML '08 · doi:10.1145/1390156.1390177 · Cited by 5,058
Learning Deep Architectures for AI
Bengio, Y. (2009) · now publishers, Inc. eBooks · doi:10.1561/9781601982957 · Cited by 4,941
Human health effects of air pollution
Kampa, M., & Castanas, E. (2008) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.012 · Cited by 4,496
Ambient air pollution: a global assessment of exposure and burden of disease
Health Organization, W. (2016) · Clean Air Journal · doi:10.17159/2410-972x/2016/v26n2a4 · Cited by 2,024
The impact of PM2.5 on the human respiratory system.
Xing, Y. F., Xu, Y., Shi, M.-H., & Lian, Y. X. (2016) · PubMed · doi:10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2016.01.19 · Cited by 1,739
PCANet: A Simple Deep Learning Baseline for Image Classification?
Chan, T.-H., Jia, K., Gao, S., Lu, J., Zeng, Z., & Ma, Y. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2015.2475625 · Cited by 1,362
A Brief Review of Facial Emotion Recognition Based on Visual Information
Ko, B. (2018) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18020401 · Cited by 724
Cited by
Subramaniam, S., Raju, N., Ganesan, A., Rajavel, N., Chenniappan, M., Prakash, C., Pramanik, A., Basak, A. K., & Dixit, S. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14169951 · Cited by 193
Análisis de PM2.5 suspendidos en el noroeste de Hermosillo
Domínguez Hurtado, J. M., Cirett Galán, F. M., & Torres Peralta, R. (2025) · EPISTEMUS · doi:10.36790/epistemus.v19i38.410
Metadata
- Authors
- Pak, U., Ma, J., Ryu, U., Ryom, K., Juhyok, U., Pak, K., & Pak, C.
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 699
- Pages
- 133561
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2965521597
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 15.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep learning-based PM2.5 prediction considering the spatiotemporal correlations: A case study of Beijing, China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.367
- The paper
- Pak, U., Ma, J., Ryu, U., Ryom, K., Juhyok, U., Pak, K., & Pak, C. (2020). Deep learning-based PM2.5 prediction considering the spatiotemporal correlations: A case study of Beijing, China. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.367
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.