The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Response of soil enzyme activities and bacterial communities to the accumulation of microplastics in an acid cropped soil
Open accessAbstract
The ecological stress of microplastics (MPs) contamination in agroecosystems raise worldwide concerns. However very few studies concentrated on the effects of MPs exposure on soil microbial community. The alterations of enzymatic activities and bacterial communities were assayed by spiking 1% and 5% (w/w) of polyethylene (PE) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) MPs in an acid soil. The results showed that both PE and PVC addition inhibited fluorescein diacetate hydrolase activity and stimulated urease and acid phosphatase activities, and declined the richness and diversity of the bacterial communities. More severe effects were observed in the PE treated soils compared to the PVC treated soils generally. The relative abundances of families Burkholderiaceae increased significantly (p < .05) after MPs addition, suggesting the bacteria associated with nitrogen fixation stimulated by the MPs input. Meanwhile, significant (p < .05) decline of Sphingomonadaceae and Xanthobacteraceae after addition of 5% PVC and 1% PE MPs, respectively implied that MPs might inhibit the biodegradation of xenobiotics in the soil. Mover, the PICRUSt analysis demonstrated that membrane transporter was a sensitive prediction functional gene of microplastics exposure in the soil. Future studies could be focused on the role of MPs on the regulation of nitrogen cycling and organic compounds degradation in soils.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Greengenes, a Chimera-Checked 16S rRNA Gene Database and Workbench Compatible with ARB
DeSantis, T. Z., Hugenholtz, P., Larsen, N., Rojas, M., Brodie, E. L., Keller, K., Huber, T., Dalevi, D., Hu, P., & Andersen, G. L. (2006) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.03006-05 · Cited by 10,891
Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences
Langille, M. G. I., Zaneveld, J., Caporaso, J. G., McDonald, D., Knights, D., Reyes, J. A., Clemente, J. C., Burkepile, D. E., Vega Thurber, R. L., Knight, R., et al. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2676 · Cited by 9,116
Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms
Caporaso, J. G., Lauber, C. L., Walters, W. A., Berg-Lyons, D., Huntley, J., Fierer, N., Owens, S. M., Betley, J., Fraser, L., Bauer, M., et al. (2012) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2012.8 · Cited by 8,839
Microplastics Can Change Soil Properties and Affect Plant Performance
de Souza Machado, A. A., Lau, C. W., Kloas, W., Bergmann, J., Bachelier, J. B., Faltin, E., Becker, R., Görlich, A. S., & Rillig, M. C. (2019) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b01339 · Cited by 2,142
Impacts of Microplastics on the Soil Biophysical Environment
de Souza Machado, A. A., Lau, C. W., Till, J., Kloas, W., Lehmann, A., Becker, R., & Rillig, M. C. (2018) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b02212 · Cited by 1,872
Are Agricultural Soils Dumps for Microplastics of Urban Origin?
Nizzetto, L., Futter, M., & Langaas, S. (2016) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b04140 · Cited by 1,724
Plastics in soil: Analytical methods and possible sources
Bläsing, M., & Amelung, W. (2018) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.086 · Cited by 1,655
Steinmetz, Z., Wollmann, C., Schaefer, M., Buchmann, C., David, J., Tröger, J., Muñoz, K., Frör, O., & Schaumann, G. E. (2016) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.153 · Cited by 1,551
An overview of microplastic and nanoplastic pollution in agroecosystems
Ng, E.-L., Huerta Lwanga, E., Eldridge, S. M., Johnston, P., Hu, H.-W., Geissen, V., & Chen, D. (2018) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.341 · Cited by 1,334
The distribution of microplastics in soil aggregate fractions in southwestern China
Zhang, G. S., & Liu, Y. F. (2018) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.004 · Cited by 1,329
Cited by
Fan, P., Yu, H., Xi, B., & Tan, W. (2022) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2022.107244 · Cited by 341
Xu, Y., Ou, Q., van der Hoek, J. P., Liu, G., & Lompe, K. M. (2024) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.3c07035 · Cited by 325
A plastic world: A review of microplastic pollution in the freshwaters of the Earth's poles
Citterich, F., Lo Giudice, A., & Azzaro, M. (2023) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161847 · Cited by 125
Dissanayake, P. D., Palansooriya, K. N., Sang, M. K., Oh, D. X., Park, J., Hwang, S. Y., Igalavithana, A. D., Gu, C., & Ok, Y. S. (2022) · Soil Use and Management · doi:10.1111/sum.12804 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Fei, Y., Huang, S., Zhang, H., Tong, Y., Wen, D., Xia, X., Wang, H., Luo, Y., & Barceló, D.
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 707
- Pages
- 135634
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2989834683
- Cited by
- 854
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 14.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Response of soil enzyme activities and bacterial communities to the accumulation of microplastics in an acid cropped soil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135634
- The paper
- Fei, Y., Huang, S., Zhang, H., Tong, Y., Wen, D., Xia, X., Wang, H., Luo, Y., & Barceló, D. (2020). Response of soil enzyme activities and bacterial communities to the accumulation of microplastics in an acid cropped soil. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135634
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
