High-efficiency As(III) oxidation and electrocoagulation removal using hematite with a charge−discharge technique
Abstract
Arsenite (As(III)) is generally removed by adsorption or coprecipitation after being oxidized to arsenate (As(V)). Electrocoagulation is regarded as an effective and environment-friendly method for arsenic (As) removal from wastewater. However, some disadvantages including the passivation of electrode and high energy consumption limit its wide application. Herein, a multi-cycle galvanostatic charge-discharge technique was employed to remove aqueous As(III) using hematite prepared through a microwave-assisted hydrothermal reaction. When charge-discharge experiments were conducted at the potential window of -0.8-0 V (vs. SCE) in As(III) solution with NaCl as the background electrolyte, ClO- intermediates and the counter electrode at high potential contributed much to As(III) oxidation. As(V) was adsorbed on ferrihydrite generated from the re-oxidation of released Fe 2+, forming FeAsO 4 precipitate. A higher removal ratio of As(T) was achieved at initial pH 7.0 compared with that at initial pH 5.0 and 9.0. When the hematite mass was 4, 10 and 15 mg, the removal ratio of As(T) reached 55.2%, 79.6% and 98.6% after 600 cycles of charge-discharge. The periodic redox reactions of hematite electrodes occurred in each charge-discharge process, effectively avoiding the passivation of electrode. Additionally, the electrochemical system can be used as a supercapacitor for power output. The present work provides a novel strategy for high-efficiency As(III) immobilization and removal from aqueous solution.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
EC drawbacks are electrode passivation, relatively high energy consumption, and the challenge of large-scale applications at lower energy consumption.
“EC drawbacks are the electrodes passivation and relatively high energy consumption 103 and the challenge of large-scale applications at lower energy consumption 104 .”
From Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater: a comprehensive and critical review (2021) · cites this paper as [103]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 25
- Authors
- Liu, L., Chen, H., Yang, X., Tan, W., Liu, C., Dang, Z., & Qiu, G.
- Affiliations
- Huazhong Agricultural University (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- South China University of Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Qiu, Guohong
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 703
- Pages
- 135678
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2990320542
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 1.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (41425006, 41571228, 41877025, 41877528)
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFD0801000, 2018YFD0800304)
- Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2662017JC025, 2662018JC055)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Advanced oxidation water treatment
- Keywords
- arsenite oxidation, electrocoagulation, hematite, charge-discharge cycling, arsenic removal, ferrihydrite, arsenate adsorption, electrode passivation, microwave-assisted hydrothermal synthesis, supercapacitors, arsenic immobilization, wastewater treatment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review