Cited by 25Arsenic contamination and mitigationCoagulation and Flocculation StudiesAdvanced oxidation water treatment

High-efficiency As(III) oxidation and electrocoagulation removal using hematite with a charge−discharge technique

Liu, Lihu, Chen, Hanchen, Yang, Xiong, Tan, Wenfeng, Liu, Chengshuai, Dang, Zhi, Qiu, Guohong·2020·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

Arsenite (As(III)) is generally removed by adsorption or coprecipitation after being oxidized to arsenate (As(V)). Electrocoagulation is regarded as an effective and environment-friendly method for arsenic (As) removal from wastewater. However, some disadvantages including the passivation of electrode and high energy consumption limit its wide application. Herein, a multi-cycle galvanostatic charge-discharge technique was employed to remove aqueous As(III) using hematite prepared through a microwave-assisted hydrothermal reaction. When charge-discharge experiments were conducted at the potential window of -0.8-0 V (vs. SCE) in As(III) solution with NaCl as the background electrolyte, ClO- intermediates and the counter electrode at high potential contributed much to As(III) oxidation. As(V) was adsorbed on ferrihydrite generated from the re-oxidation of released Fe 2+, forming FeAsO 4 precipitate. A higher removal ratio of As(T) was achieved at initial pH 7.0 compared with that at initial pH 5.0 and 9.0. When the hematite mass was 4, 10 and 15 mg, the removal ratio of As(T) reached 55.2%, 79.6% and 98.6% after 600 cycles of charge-discharge. The periodic redox reactions of hematite electrodes occurred in each charge-discharge process, effectively avoiding the passivation of electrode. Additionally, the electrochemical system can be used as a supercapacitor for power output. The present work provides a novel strategy for high-efficiency As(III) immobilization and removal from aqueous solution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135678

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • EC drawbacks are electrode passivation, relatively high energy consumption, and the challenge of large-scale applications at lower energy consumption.

    “EC drawbacks are the electrodes passivation and relatively high energy consumption 103 and the challenge of large-scale applications at lower energy consumption 104 .”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 25

Authors
Liu, L., Chen, H., Yang, X., Tan, W., Liu, C., Dang, Z., & Qiu, G.
Affiliations
  • Huazhong Agricultural University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • South China University of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Qiu, Guohong
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
703
Pages
135678
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2990320542
Cited by
25
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (41425006, 41571228, 41877025, 41877528)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFD0801000, 2018YFD0800304)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2662017JC025, 2662018JC055)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Advanced oxidation water treatment
Keywords
arsenite oxidation, electrocoagulation, hematite, charge-discharge cycling, arsenic removal, ferrihydrite, arsenate adsorption, electrode passivation, microwave-assisted hydrothermal synthesis, supercapacitors, arsenic immobilization, wastewater treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review