Cited by 75Marine and coastal ecosystemsToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes

Spectroscopic and molecular-level characteristics of dissolved organic matter in the Pearl River Estuary, South China

Liu, Yuchen, Ye, Quanhui, Huang, Wan-Ling, Feng, Lian, Wang, Ying-Hui, Xie, Zheng, Yong, Shan-Shan, Zhang, Song +3 more·2020·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

Coastal populations are expanding globally, resulting in great anthropogenic impacts on the organic matter in estuaries and regional carbon cycles. However, the molecular-level characteristics of dissolved organic matter (DOM) within highly disturbed estuaries are still not well understood. Here, water samples collected during two seasons (wet and dry) from the subtropical Pearl River Estuary of China were analyzed using absorption and fluorescence spectroscopy and Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS) to determine the spatiotemporal variations in the DOM characteristics. In the seaward direction, the abundances of chromophoric and fluorescent DOM decreased by greater percentages than the bulk dissolved organic carbon concentration. The spectroscopy and FT-ICR MS analyses collectively indicated seaward declines in the aromaticity of DOM and terrestrial DOM contributions from natural terrestrial markers and anthropogenic synthetic surfactants. In particular, the S content in DOM was much higher here than in previously reported estuaries, suggesting a strong anthropogenic impact on the estuarine DOM. Greater terrestrial and anthropogenic signatures in DOM were observed in the wet season than in the dry season. Importantly, this study implies that the terrestrial and anthropogenic contributions to DOM were strongly driven by season in the anthropogenically disturbed subtropical estuary.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136307

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, Y., Ye, Q., Huang, W.-L., Feng, L., Wang, Y.-H., Xie, Z., Yong, S.-S., Zhang, S., Jiang, B., Zheng, Y., & Wang, J.-J.
Affiliations
  • Southern University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
710
Pages
136307
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2998352506
Cited by
75
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 3
FWCI
4.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Colleges Innovation Project of Guangdong
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (41807360, 41890852, 41890851)
  • State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Sources and Control of Air Pollution Complex
  • Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Remediation Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Keywords
dissolved organic matter, Pearl River Estuary, anthropogenic impacts, terrestrial organic matter, synthetic surfactants, DOM aromaticity, sulfur content, seasonal variation, subtropical estuary, estuarine carbon cycle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review