Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 300

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Removal efficiency of micro- and nanoplastics (180 nm–125 μm) during drinking water treatment

Open access
Zhang, Yongli, Diehl, Allison, Lewandowski, Ashton, Gopalakrishnan, Kishore, Baker, Tracie·2020·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

This study investigated the removal efficiency of micro- and nanoplastics (180 nm – 125 μm) during drinking water treatment, particularly coagulation/flocculation combined with sedimentation (CFS) and granular filtration under ordinary working conditions at water treatment plants (WTPs). It also studied the interactions between biofilms and microplastics and the consequential impact on treatment efficiency. Generally, CFS was not sufficient to remove micro- and nanoplastics. The sedimentation rate of clean plastics was lower than 2.0% for all different sizes of plastic particles with coagulant Al2(SO4)3. Even with the addition of coagulant aid (PolyDADMAC), the highest removal was only 13.6% for 45 – 53 μm of particles. In contrast, granular filtration was much more effective at filtering out micro- and nanoplastics, from 86.9% to nearly complete removal (99.9% for particles larger than 100 μm). However, there existed a critical size (10 – 20 μm) where a significant lower removal (86.9%) was observed. Biofilms were easily formed on microplastics. In addition, biofilm formation significantly increased the removal efficiency of CFS treatment from less than 2.0% to 16.5%. This work provides new knowledge to better understand the fate and transport of emerging micro- and nanoplastic pollutants during drinking water treatment, which is of increasing concern due to the potential human exposure to micro- and nanoplastics in drinking water.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137383

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Cited by

See all 300

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, Y., Diehl, A., Lewandowski, A., Gopalakrishnan, K., & Baker, T.
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
720
Pages
137383
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3006755084
Cited by
300
References
37
FWCI
7.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Removal efficiency of micro- and nanoplastics (180 nm–125 μm) during drinking water treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137383
The paper
Zhang, Y., Diehl, A., Lewandowski, A., Gopalakrishnan, K., & Baker, T. (2020). Removal efficiency of micro- and nanoplastics (180 nm–125 μm) during drinking water treatment. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137383

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.