Cited by 87Urban Stormwater Management SolutionsLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesUrban Planning and Landscape Design

China's sponge city development for urban water resilience and sustainability: A policy discussion

Ma, Yongchi, Jiang, Yong, Swallow, Stephen·2020·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

China recently introduced a national policy initiative called sponge city development as a holistic, ecosystem-based approach integrated with urban planning and development to address storm-induced pluvial flooding as well as other urban water and environmental issues. The initiative, while following the U.S. low impact development with a concept also similar to the U.K. sustainable drainage systems and Australian water sensitive cities, is subject to a major design issue in practice with infrastructure projects of similar types adopted unanimously across regions despite spatially diverse and heterogeneous hydrological and biophysical conditions. The ecosystem services framework as applied to the urban setting, particularly its holistic consideration of ecosystem structure and management intervention in relation to services or benefits delivery, can and should guide the planning, design, development, and evaluation of relevant projects or nature-based practices for carrying out the policy initiative, a perspective of practical value with foreseeable transformative impact that has received little recognition in China's current green urban movement toward water resilience and sustainability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139078

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sponge city programs have showcased the efficacy of NbS and the need for urban planning practitioners to better integrate engineering designs into onsite, low-impact development practices while meeting urban policy goals.

    “Sponge city programs have not only showcased the efficacy of NbS but also the need for urban planning practitioners to better integrate engineering designs into onsite, low-impact development practices while meeting urban policy goals (106).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ma, Y., Jiang, Y., & Swallow, S.
Affiliations
  • Shandong University (CN)
  • IHE Delft Institute for Water Education (NL)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
Corresponding author
Jiang, Yong
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
729
Pages
139078
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3019438427
Cited by
87
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3
FWCI
3.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (71571028)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Urban Planning and Landscape Design
Keywords
sponge city, urban water resilience, urban sustainability, pluvial flooding, low impact development, sustainable urban drainage systems, water sensitive cities, ecosystem services, nature-based solutions, urban planning policy, green infrastructure, China

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review