Cited by 165Microplastics and Plastic Pollutionbiodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesAnalytical chemistry methods development

A critical review of the overlooked challenge of determining micro-bioplastics in soil

Fojt, Jakub, David, Jan, Přikryl, Radek, Řezáčová, Veronika, Kučerík, Jiří·2020·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

Currently, non-biodegradable oil-based plastics are gradually being replaced by bio-based biodegradable plastics to prevent the formation of microplastics. For biodegradable materials to decompose completely, however, they require specific conditions that are rarely met in ecosystems. Paradoxically, this may lead to the fast production of microplastics from biodegradable materials, i.e. micro-bioplastics. Until recently, the scientific focus has been solely on the estimation of conventional microplastics. As a result, there is a lack of analytical methods for determining the amount of micro-bioplastics in soil. In this review, we address this problem by summarising sample pre-treatments and analytical techniques suitable for the determination of conventional microplastics, which serve as inspiration for the determination of micro-bioplastics from polyhydroxybutyrates, polylactic acid and polybutylene adipate terephthalate in soil. The analytical techniques include both pyrolysis-based techniques, i.e. thermoanalytical and non-thermoanalytical approaches including sample pre-separation and respective detection limits. We conclude that due to the incomplete knowledge of the production rate of micro-bioplastics, fate, sorption properties and toxicity, it is necessary to develop and validate a rapid and suitable method for their determination. Indeed, the use of thermoanalytical approaches seems to be the most promising strategy. Furthermore, we suggest how the development and analysis of micro-bioplastics should be addressed in future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140975

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 140 · Cited by 165

Authors
Fojt, J., David, J., Přikryl, R., Řezáčová, V., & Kučerík, J.
Affiliations
  • Brno University of Technology (CZ)
  • University of Koblenz and Landau (DE)
Corresponding author
Kučerík, Jiří
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
745
Pages
140975
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3043232826
Cited by
165
References
140
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministerstvo Průmyslu a Obchodu
  • Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy (FV40094)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
Keywords
biodegradable plastics, soil microplastics, polyhydroxybutyrate, polylactic acid, poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate), sample preparation, thermoanalytical methods, detection limit

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review