Cited by 18Microplastics and Plastic PollutionEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicologybiodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

Assessing the ecological consequences of biodegradable plastics: Acute, chronic and multigenerational impacts of poly-3-hydroxybutyrate microplastics on freshwater invertebrate Daphnia magna

Open access
Procházková, Petra, Kalčíková, Gabriela, Maršálková, Eliška, Brtnický, Martin, Gargošová, Helena Zlámalová, Kučerík, Jiří·2024·Heliyon

Abstract

in the food chain, these findings suggest that biodegradable microplastics may indeed negatively affect freshwater ecosystems.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

P3HB microplastics caused no acute immobilization or mortality in *Daphnia magna* over 96 h, but chronic and multigenerational exposure increased mortality, reduced reproduction, and slowed growth. Effects were concentration- and size-dependent, with the smaller <63 μm fraction generally producing stronger adverse responses.

Key findings

  • No acute effects were observed for either P3HB size fraction (<63 μm and <125 μm), whether tested as suspension or leachate and with neonates or 7-day-old organisms, even after 96 h.
  • In chronic tests, increasing P3HB concentration increased maternal mortality up to 43.3 % for <63 μm and 46.7 % for <125 μm; reproductive activity declined by up to 19.9 % and 11.2 % at 12.5 and 25 mg/L for <63 μm, and by 12.2 % at 25 mg/L for <125 μm.
  • Growth rate showed minor stimulation at the lowest concentrations (1.9 % for <63 μm, 2.1 % for <125 μm) followed by inhibition (13.6 % for <63 μm, 8.6 % for <125 μm).
  • In multigenerational exposure at 1.56 mg/L, F0 showed slight reproductive stimulation (3.2 % for <63 μm, 4.0 % for <125 μm), but by F3 reproductive activity was inhibited by 23.6 % and 19.2 %, respectively; growth declined in F2–F3 for <63 μm (0.4 % and 5.9 %) and from F1 for <125 μm (8.6 %).

Methods

  • Acute tests followed OECD 202: *D. magna* neonates (<24 h) and 7-day-old individuals were exposed to P3HB suspensions or leachates at 0, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, and 100 mg/L for 96 h, with immobilization assessed at 24, 48, 72, and 96 h.
  • Chronic tests followed OECD 211: 21-day exposure starting with neonates, initially at 6.25–100 mg/L, then reduced to 1.56, 3.13, 6.25, 12.5, and 25 mg/L due to high mortality; survival, growth, age at first reproduction, and total offspring were measured, with ten replicates per concentration and three experimental repeats.
  • Multigenerational tests exposed four consecutive generations (F0–F3) to 1.56 mg/L of both P3HB fractions for 21 days per generation; statistical differences from controls were assessed with Dunnett’s test at p < 0.05, and growth rate was calculated from body length change over 21 days.

Limitations

  • The paper does not include a dedicated limitations section; the following limitations are evident from the text.
  • The prepared particle sizes did not precisely match the <63 μm and <125 μm fractions because ultrasonication was not applied during sieving, although the authors refer to the mesh sizes for clarity.
  • Chronic high-concentration exposures caused substantial mortality, forcing the authors to reduce concentrations in subsequent chronic tests, and the multigenerational experiment used only a single concentration (1.56 mg/L), limiting full concentration–response characterization across generations.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36302

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

19 of 30 cited sources checked · 13 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Biodegradation is associated with the development of a biofilm on the surface of plastics, including P3HB microplastics.

    “Biodegradation is associated with the development of a biofilm on the surface of the plastics [54], which applies also to P3HB MPs [45].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [54] Okeke, 2022, Ecotoxicological and health implications of microplastic-associated biofilms: a recent review and prospect for turning the hazards into benefits, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. source
    • cites [45] Procházková, 2023, Effects of biodegradable P3HB on the specific growth rate, root length and chlorophyll content of duckweed, Lemna minor, Heliyon [Internet] source
  • Premisecitation

    As the concentration of P3HB microplastics in suspension increased, the content of P3HB found in Daphnia magna increased.

    “Furthermore, as the concentration of P3HB MPs in suspension increased, so did the content of P3HB found in D. magna [52].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [52] Procházková, 2024, Innovative approach for quantitative determination of ingested microplastics by Daphnia magna: use of differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetry, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. source
  • Premisecitation

    At a concentration of 25 mg/L, Daphnia magna ingested P3HB microplastics up to 10.3 wt% of MPs <63 μm and 6.3 wt% of MPs <125 μm.

    “For example, at a concentration of 25 mg/L, D. magna ingested P3HB MPs up to 10.3 wt% of MPs <63 μm and 6.3 wt% of MPs <125 μm, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [52] Procházková, 2024, Innovative approach for quantitative determination of ingested microplastics by Daphnia magna: use of differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetry, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. source
  • Premisecitation

    Despite their biodegradability, microplastics from biodegradable polymers can persist for extended periods due to environmental factors such as temperature, humidity, pH, biologically active substances, and microorganisms.

    “However, despite their biodegradability, these MPs can persist for extended periods due to the influence of various environmental factors (biotic and abiotic) environmental factors such as temperature, humidity, pH, biologically active substances, and the presence and activity of microorganisms [19,20].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [19] Agarwal, 2020, Biodegradable polymers: present opportunities and challenges in providing a microplastic‐free environment, Macromol. Chem. Phys. source
    • cites [20] Wei, 2021, Microplastics generated from a biodegradable plastic in freshwater and seawater, Water Res [Internet] source
  • Premisecitation

    Daphnia magna is capable of non-selectively ingesting particles varying from <1 μm to approximately 70 μm in size.

    “This filter-feeding species is capable to non-selectively ingest particles varying from <1 μm to approximately 70 μm in size [27,28].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [27] Schür, 2020, Microplastics but not natural particles induce multigenerational effects in Daphnia magna, Environ. Pollut. source

      Section 4.3 (page unavailable) says D. magna readily ingests microplastics smaller than 90 μm and gives a filter-apparatus lower size limit of 200 nm, supporting the claimed size range. The paper does not establish that ingestion is non-selective; Section 4.4 (page unavailable) describes particle rejection behavior. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [28] Frydkjær, 2017, Ingestion and egestion of microplastics by the cladoceran Daphnia magna: effects of regular and irregular shaped plastic and sorbed phenanthrene, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 16
  • May combine two claims. 13
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Microplastics are defined as small plastic particles ranging from 1 to 1000 μm in size.

    “Microplastics (MPs) are defined as small plastic particles ranging from 1 to 1000 μm in size [1], and have become ubiquitous, found in diverse locations worldwide, spanning from urban centers to remote regions, both on land and in the ocean [2].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] Hartmann, 2019, Are we speaking the same language? Recommendations for a definition and categorization framework for plastic debris, Environ. Sci. Technol. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The particle sizes of the P3HB microplastics do not precisely match the nominal <63 μm and <125 μm size fractions because ultrasonication was not applied during preparation.

    “The particle sizes do not precisely match both size fractions (for details see Procházková et al. [45]) because ultrasonication was not applied during the process. However, for clarity in the text, we refer to the mesh size used for particle preparation i.e. <63 μm and <125 μm.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [45] Procházková, 2023, Effects of biodegradable P3HB on the specific growth rate, root length and chlorophyll content of duckweed, Lemna minor, Heliyon [Internet] source

      The Materials and methods section (Preparation of microparticles; page unavailable) confirms that P3HB was sieved using 63 and 125 μm meshes. It does not report that measured particle sizes failed to match those fractions or attribute such a mismatch to omitted ultrasonication. Experimental design (page unavailable) states that the subsequently prepared test suspension was ultrasonicated for 10 minutes, so the claim needs to distinguish particle preparation from suspension preparation. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The observed adverse effects on growth, reproduction, and mortality during chronic experiments can be attributed to multifaceted mechanisms, which may involve mechanical damage to organisms through adsorption to their appendices and body surface, nutrient depletion in test medium, and the ingestion of microplastics.

    “These effects can be attributed to multifaceted mechanisms, which may involve mechanical damage to organisms through adsorption to their appendices and body surface [51], nutrient depletion in test medium [45], and the ingestion of MPs [7].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [51] Guilhermino, 2021, Long-term adverse effects of microplastics on Daphnia magna reproduction and population growth rate at increased water temperature and light intensity: combined effects of stressors and interactions, Sci. Total Environ. [Internet] source
    • cites [45] Procházková, 2023, Effects of biodegradable P3HB on the specific growth rate, root length and chlorophyll content of duckweed, Lemna minor, Heliyon [Internet] source
    • cites [7] Cole, 2013, Microplastic ingestion by zooplankton, Environ. Sci. Technol. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Biodegradable plastics generally degrade faster than conventional plastics in the natural environment.

    “They are expected to degrade in the natural environment, even if their complete degradation is not always achieved due to unfavorable conditions (e.g. low temperature, unsuitable pH, microorganisms), they generally degrade faster than conventional plastics [56].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [56] Fan, 2022, A review on the occurrence and influence of biodegradable microplastics in soil ecosystems: are biodegradable plastics substitute or threat?, Environ Int [Internet] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Biodegradation of biodegradable plastics can lead to oxygen depletion and affect nutrient levels.

    “Therefore, their biodegradation can lead to oxygen depletion and affect nutrient levels, as shown in our previous study [45].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [45] Procházková, 2023, Effects of biodegradable P3HB on the specific growth rate, root length and chlorophyll content of duckweed, Lemna minor, Heliyon [Internet] source

      The Conclusion (page not provided) links P3HB biodegradation to nutrient depletion in water, supporting the nutrient-level part of the claim. The Introduction describes aerobic biodegradation, but neither it nor the passages retrieved for oxygen report oxygen depletion; that part is not supported by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    P3HB has a density (1.23 g/cm3) that suggests a predisposition to settle down in aquatic environments, although turbulence, water flow, and thunderstorms can lead to its resuspension within the water column.

    “Its density (1.23 g/cm3) suggests a predisposition to settle down in aquatic environments, although factors such as turbulence, water flow, and thunderstorms can lead to its resuspension within the water column [[24], [25], [26]].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [24] Savenkova, 2000, Mechanical properties and biodegradation characteristics of PHB-based films, Process Biochem. source
    • cites [25] Turco, 2021, In vivo and post-synthesis strategies to enhance the properties of PHB-based materials: a review, Front Bioeng Biotechnol [Internet] source

      Table 1 in the Introduction lists PHB’s density as 1.23 g/cm3, supporting the numerical property attributed to the source. The reviewed passages do not discuss P3HB settling in aquatic environments or being resuspended by turbulence, water flow, or thunderstorms; searches for those processes found no supporting passage. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.89)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [26] Anderson, 2016, Microplastics in aquatic environments: implications for Canadian ecosystems, Environ. Pollut. source

      Section 3.2 says denser plastics are more likely to sink and that turbulence and storm activity can resuspend high-density microplastics throughout the water column. It does not identify P3HB or give its density as 1.23 g/cm3, and it does not specifically say that water flow causes resuspension. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Biofilm formation on microplastics has the potential to transport pathogens.

    “Another issue associated with biofilm formation on MPs is its potential to transport pathogens [57,58].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [57] Rummel, 2017, Impacts of biofilm formation on the fate and potential effects of microplastic in the aquatic environment, Environ Sci Technol Lett [Internet] source
    • cites [58] Trojan, 2024, The interaction of microplastics and microbioplastics with soil and a comparison of their potential to spread pathogens, Appl. Sci. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Savva et al. compared sublethal effects and food intake of D. magna of PHB, PLA, and conventional MPs, revealing that biodegradable MPs had a more pronounced toxic impact.

    “Savva et al. [43] compared the sublethal effects and food intake of D. magna of polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB, not specified), PLA MPs, and conventional ones revealing that biodegradable MPs had a more pronounced toxic impact.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [43] Savva, 2023, Sublethal effects of bio-plastic microparticles and their components on the behaviour of Daphnia magna, Environ Res [Internet] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For P3HB MPs <125 μm, a decrease in growth rate was evident as early as the F1 generation and reached 8.6%.

    “Conversely, for MPs <125 μm, this decrease in growth rate was evident as early as the F1 generation and reached 8.6 % (Fig. 2D).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    No acute effects (mortality/immobilization) were observed for either P3HB microplastic size fraction (<63 μm and <125 μm) in Daphnia magna, even after 96 h of exposure.

    “No acute effects were observed for either size fraction.”
    • Also stated in: § Acute experiments · plain
      “In this experiment involving P3HB MPs (whether suspension or leachate and whether with neonates or 7-day-old organisms), no instance resulted in an increase in daphnid mortality, even after 96 h of exposure.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In multigenerational experiments, a slight increase in the mortality of mother organisms was observed, consistent with the chronic experiment.

    “Furthermore, a delay in the first day of reproduction was observed in all cases (Fig. 2B) along with a slight increase in the mortality of mother organisms, consistent with the results of the chronic experiment (Fig. 2C).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For P3HB MPs <125 μm, growth rate showed a minor stimulation at the lowest microplastic concentrations (2.1%) and a subsequent slight inhibition of growth (8.6%).

    “For both size fractions of P3HB MPs, following a minor growth stimulation at the lowest microplastic concentrations in suspension (1.9 % for MPs <63 μm, and 2.1 % for MPs <125 μm), there was a subsequent slight inhibition of growth (13.6 % for MPs <63 μm, and 8.6 % for MPs <125 μm, Fig. 1D).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For P3HB MPs <63 μm, growth rate showed a minor stimulation at the lowest microplastic concentrations (1.9%) and a subsequent slight inhibition of growth (13.6%).

    “For both size fractions of P3HB MPs, following a minor growth stimulation at the lowest microplastic concentrations in suspension (1.9 % for MPs <63 μm, and 2.1 % for MPs <125 μm), there was a subsequent slight inhibition of growth (13.6 % for MPs <63 μm, and 8.6 % for MPs <125 μm, Fig. 1D).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the last generation (F3), inhibition of reproductive activity reached 23.6% for MPs <63 μm and 19.2% for MPs <125 μm.

    “In the last generation of mother organisms (F3) it reached 23.6 % for MPs <63 μm, and 19.2 % for MPs <125 μm.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Each acute experiment was repeated three times and consisted of four replicates of the same treatment.

    “Each experiment was repeated three times and consisted of four replicates of the same treatment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Each chronic experiment was repeated three times and had ten replicates within each concentration.

    “Each test vessel held one neonate, and there were ten replicates within each concentration. Each experiment was repeated three times and lasted 21 days.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The multigenerational exposure of each generation followed the OECD guideline No. 211.

    “The exposure of each generation followed the OECD guideline No. 211 [49] and the setup and conditions were consistent with those employed in the previous chronic experiments (see Section 2.4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [49] 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Age-synchronized test organisms were randomly distributed among treatment and control groups.

    “These age-synchronized test organisms were randomly distributed among various treatment (see Section 2.3, 2.4, 2.5). and control groups.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The chronic experiments were designed according to the standard OECD No. 211: 21-d Daphnia reproduction test.

    “The experiments were designed according to the standard OECD No. 211: 21-d Daphnia reproduction test [49].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [49] 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The formation of biofilm on the plastic surface, lasting minutes to hours, is most likely the initial interaction with the surrounding biota.

    “Subsequently, the formation of biofilm on the plastic surface, lasting minutes to hours, is mostly likely the initial interaction with the surrounding biota [54].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [54] Okeke, 2022, Ecotoxicological and health implications of microplastic-associated biofilms: a recent review and prospect for turning the hazards into benefits, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisereasoning

    The anticipated rise in the usage of biodegradable plastics will lead to a corresponding surge in environmental contamination by microplastics.

    “Hence, it is evident that the anticipated rise in the usage of biodegradable plastics will lead to a corresponding surge in environmental contamination by MPs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    During the acute test (96 h), Daphnia magna might ingest not only P3HB microplastics but also the biofilm present on their surface, using it as a source of nutrients.

    “During the acute test (96 h) the organisms might ingest not only P3HB MPs but also the biofilm presents on their surface, using it as a source of nutrients.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    When plastic particles or products are released into the aquatic environment, a coating layer of inorganic and organic pollutants rapidly forms on their surface.

    “When plastic particles or products are released into the aquatic environment, a coating layer of inorganic and organic pollutants rapidly forms on their surface.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [54] Okeke, 2022, Ecotoxicological and health implications of microplastic-associated biofilms: a recent review and prospect for turning the hazards into benefits, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Daphnids are globally abundant in aquatic environments and play a significant role in bridging primary producers and higher trophic level consumers.

    “Daphnids are also preferred for these studies because of their global abundance in aquatic environments and their significant role in bridging primary producers and higher trophic level consumers [30].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [30] Eltemsah, 2019, Acute and chronic effects of polystyrene microplastics on juvenile and adult Daphnia magna, Environ. Pollut. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The biodegradation of biodegradable plastics can affect organisms that are sensitive to lower oxygen levels or plants that require certain nutrients for their growth.

    “This in turn can affect organisms that are sensitive to lower oxygen level or plants that require certain nutrients for their growth.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning

    It remains uncertain whether biodegradable MPs have similar adverse effects to conventional MPs.

    “While conventional MPs pose various risks to aquatic organisms, it remains uncertain whether biodegradable MPs have similar adverse effects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
26 of 26
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The effects observed in laboratory experiments on D. magna can be extrapolated to natural freshwater ecosystems.

    “Given the important role of D. magna in the food chain, these findings suggest that biodegradable microplastics may indeed negatively affect freshwater ecosystems.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The P3HB microplastic particles used in the experiments are representative of P3HB microplastics that would form and persist in freshwater environments.

    “P3HB MPs (ENMAT Y3000, spherical shape) from TianAn Biologic Materials Co., Ltd., Ningbo City, China were used.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The conditions required for biodegradation of P3HB are rarely met in aquatic environments.

    “These conditions are rarely met in aquatic environments.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The potential effects of biodegradable plastics on biota are poorly understood, and even less is known about whether these effects are influenced by their biodegradability.

    “The potential effects of biodegradable plastics on biota are poorly understood, but even less is known about whether these effects are influenced by their biodegradability.”
4 of 4

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Multigenerational feeding conditions differ from the stated chronic conditions

    Minor

    The methods say the multigenerational setup and conditions were consistent with the chronic experiments, but they name different algal species as food.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 64 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Procházková, P., Kalčíková, G., Maršálková, E., Brtnický, M., Gargošová, H. Z., & Kučerík, J.
Affiliations
  • Brno University of Technology (CZ)
  • University of Ljubljana (SI)
  • Mendel University in Brno (CZ)
Venue
Heliyon
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-08
Volume
10
Issue
16
Pages
e36302
ISSN
2405-8440 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401556539
Cited by
18
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 2
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Heliyon (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Brno University of Technology Digital Library (Brno University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency (P2-0191, J1-50014)
  • European Cooperation in Science and Technology
  • Ministry of Education Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic (FCH\u2013S-23-8297)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
Keywords
polyhydroxybutyrate, biodegradable plastics, microplastics, Daphnia magna, freshwater invertebrates, acute toxicity, chronic toxicity, multigenerational effects, freshwater ecosystems, trophic transfer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review