Cited by 63Soil and Water Nutrient DynamicsAgricultural economics and policiesAgricultural Science and Fertilization

Increased nitrogen use efficiency in crop production can provide economic and environmental benefits

Open access
Langholtz, Matthew, Davison, Brian H., Jager, Henriette I., Eaton, Laurence, Baskaran, Latha M., Davis, Maggie, Brandt, Craig C.·2021·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

Potential economic and environmental benefits of increasing nitrogen-use efficiency (NUE) are widely recognized but scarcely quantified. This study quantifies the effects of increased NUE on 1) the national agricultural economy using a simulation model of US agriculture and 2) regional water quality effects using a biogeochemical model for the Arkansas-White-Red river basin. National economic effects are reported for NUE improvement scenarios of 10%, 20%, 50%, and 100%, whereas regional water quality effects are estimated for a 20% NUE improvement scenario in the Arkansas-White-Red river basin. Simulating a 20% increase in NUE in row crops is shown to reduce N requirements by 1.4 million tonnes y-1 and increase farmer net profits by 1.6% ($743 million) per year by 2026 over the baseline simulation for the same period. For each 10% increase in NUE, annual farm revenues for commodity crops increased over the baseline by approximately $350 million per year by 2026. Changes in crop prices and land-use relative to the baseline were less than 2%. This suggests a net benefit even though fertilizer cost savings can result in increased cultivation of land, i.e., 'Jevon's paradox'. Results from the biogeochemical model of the Arkansas-White-Red river basin suggest that a 20% increase in NUE corresponds to a 5.72% reduction in nitrate loadings to freshwaters, with higher reductions in agricultural watersheds. The value of these reductions was estimated as $43 ha-1, for a total of $15.3 to 136.7 million yr-1 in avoided water treatment costs. After estimating the social value of increased NUE, we conclude with a discussion of potential strategies to increase efficiency and the research needed to achieve this goal. These include perennialization of the agricultural landscape, genetic crop improvement, targeted fertilizer application, and manipulation of the plant-root microbiome.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143602

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nitrogen fertilizers negatively impact aquatic ecosystems through nutrient runoff, and contaminate ground and drinking water.

    “Furthermore, nitrogen fertilizers negatively impact aquatic ecosystems through nutrient runoff, and contaminate ground and drinking water (Houlton et al., 2019;Langholtz et al., 2021).”
  • Increasing NUE in crops is a sustainable solution that not only maximizes yield potential in the face of increasing global food demands, but also would mitigate the economic and environmental impacts of fertilizer use.

    “Increasing NUE in crops is a sustainable solution that not only maximizes yield potential in the face of increasing global food demands, but also would mitigate the economic and environmental impacts of fertilizer use (Houlton et al., 2019;He et al., 2021;Langholtz et al., 2021;Karunarathne et al., 2022).”
  • A 20% increase in NUE would increase crop revenue by USD 743 million per annum and reduce the cost of water treatment by about USD 15-136 million per annum.

    “A 20% increase in NUE would increase crop revenue by USD 743 million per annum and reduce the cost of water treatment by about USD 15-136 million per annum (Langholtz et al., 2021).”
  • Modelling of USA cropping systems has estimated that a 10% increase in NUE over a 10-year period would increase crop revenue by USD 350 million per annum.

    “Modelling of USA cropping systems has estimated that a 10% increase in NUE over a 10-year period would increase crop revenue by USD 350 million per annum.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Langholtz, M., Davison, B. H., Jager, H. I., Eaton, L., Baskaran, L. M., Davis, M., & Brandt, C. C.
Affiliations
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Langholtz, Matthew
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
758
Pages
143602
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3102647085
Cited by
63
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9
FWCI
2.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory
  • Bioenergy Technologies Office
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (DE-15593)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Agricultural economics and policies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
Keywords
nitrogen use efficiency, agricultural economics, water quality, nitrate loading, fertilizer cost savings, farm profitability, agricultural watersheds, perennial agriculture, crop genetic improvement
MeSH terms
Crop Production, Agriculture, Arkansas, Fertilizers, Nitrogen, Crops, Agricultural

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review