Cited by 221Heavy metals in environmentAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterials

A meta-analysis of heavy metal bioavailability response to biochar aging: Importance of soil and biochar properties

Yuan, Chengpeng, Gao, Baolin, Peng, Yutao, Gao, Xing, Fan, Beibei, Chen, Qing·2021·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

Biochar has been widely applied to remediate the heavy metal-polluted soils, whereas biochar aging can induce the changes of the biochar physic-chemical properties. Afterwards, the bioavailability of heavy metals (BHM) will vary in soils which likely increase the unstable fractions of heavy metals and the following environmental risks. To explore the biochar aging effects on the BHM changes in responses to the variation of experimental conditions and biochar properties, a meta-analysis for the literatures published before May 2020 was conducted. A sum of 257 independent observations from 22 published papers was obtained. The results from the analysis of boosted regression tree showed that the soil pH was the most important factor influencing the BHM changes in biochar amended soil, followed by soil texture, aging time and biochar pyrolysis temperature. The results of this review showed that the BHM was decreased by 16.9%, 28.7% and 6.4% in weakly acid soil (pH 6.00-6.99), coarse- and medium-textured soils, respectively, but increased by 149% and 121% in the alkaline (pH > 8.00) and fine-textured soils. The BHM declined in the soils amended with biochar pyrolyzed at relative high temperature (> 500 °C), and increased during aging in soils amended with biochar pyrolyzed at relatively low temperature (401-500 °C). In terms of diverse immobilized heavy metals, only bioavailable Zn in soil decreased after aging. However, there was no significant changes in Cd, Cu and Pb's bioavala…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144058

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 115 · Cited by 221

Authors
Yuan, C., Gao, B., Peng, Y., Gao, X., Fan, B., & Chen, Q.
Affiliations
China Agricultural University (CN)
Corresponding author
Chen, Qing
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
756
Pages
144058
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3108334535
Cited by
221
References
115
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 18
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • China Agricultural Research System (CARS-23-B16)
  • Agriculture Research System of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
Keywords
biochar aging, heavy metal bioavailability, biochar-amended soil, soil pH, soil texture, biochar pyrolysis temperature, aging time, zinc bioavailability, cadmium, copper, lead, heavy metal immobilization, soil remediation
MeSH terms
Biological Availability, Charcoal, Soil, Soil Pollutants, Metals, Heavy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review