CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 38

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multi-product strategy to enhance the environmental profile of the canning industry towards circular economy

Cortés, Antonio, Esteve-Llorens, Xavier, González-García, Sara, Moreira, Maria Teresa, Feijoo, Gumersindo·2021·Science of The Total Environment
DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148249
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148249

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 2
CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 1 System boundaries for the environmental assessment of canned tuna value chain.
Fig. 1 System boundaries for the environmental assessment of canned tuna value chain.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 2 Relative contribution to environmental impacts associated with the canned tuna value chain.
Fig. 2 Relative contribution to environmental impacts associated with the canned tuna value chain.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 3 Relative contribution to environmental impacts associated with Subsystem 1. Tuna fishery (a) and Subsystem 2. Canning process (b).
Fig. 3 Relative contribution to environmental impacts associated with Subsystem 1. Tuna fishery (a) and Subsystem 2. Canning process (b).CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 4 Comparative environmental profile of the two alternative canned tuna production scenarios.
Fig. 4 Comparative environmental profile of the two alternative canned tuna production scenarios.CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 66

  1. Abdou, 2018, Environmental life cycle assessment of seafood production: a case study of trawler catches in Tunisia, Sci. Total Environ., 610–611, 298, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.067 · DOI
  2. Abdou, 2020, Combining ecosystem indicators and life cycle assessment for environmental assessment of demersal trawling in Tunisia, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 25, 105, 10.1007/s11367-019-01651-5 · DOI
  3. Almeida, 2014, Environmental assessment of sardine (Sardina pilchardus) purse seine fishery in Portugal with LCA methodology including biological impact categories, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 19, 297, 10.1007/s11367-013-0646-5 · DOI
  4. Almeida, 2015, Environmental life cycle assessment of a canned sardine product from Portugal, J. Ind. Ecol., 19, 607, 10.1111/jiec.12219 · DOI
  5. Avadí, 2013, Life cycle assessment of fisheries: a review for fisheries scientists and managers, Fish. Res., 143, 21, 10.1016/j.fishres.2013.01.006 · DOI
  6. Avadí, 2014, Environmental assessment of Peruvian anchoveta food products: is less refined better?, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 19, 1276, 10.1007/s11367-014-0737-y · DOI
  7. Avadí, 2015, Life cycle assessment of Ecuadorian processed tuna, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 20, 1415, 10.1007/s11367-015-0943-2 · DOI
  8. Avadí, 2018, Environmental assessment of the Peruvian industrial hake fishery with LCA, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 23, 1126, 10.1007/s11367-017-1364-1 · DOI
  9. Ayer, 2007, Co-product allocation in life cycle assessments of seafood production systems: review of problems and strategies, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 12, 480, 10.1065/lca2006.11.284 · DOI
  10. Bohnes, 2019, LCA of aquaculture systems: methodological issues and potential improvements, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 24, 324, 10.1007/s11367-018-1517-x · DOI
  11. Bohnes, 2019, Life cycle assessments of aquaculture systems: a critical review of reported findings with recommendations for policy and system development, Rev. Aquac., 11, 1061, 10.1111/raq.12280 · DOI
  12. Ciccullo, 2021, Implementing the circular economy paradigm in the agri-food supply chain: the role of food waste prevention technologies, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 164, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105114 · DOI
  13. Corona, 2019, Towards sustainable development through the circular economy—a review and critical assessment on current circularity metrics, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 151, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104498 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Cortés, 2021, Evaluation of the enviromental sustainability of the inshore grear scallop (Pecten maximus) fishery in Galicia, J. Ind. Ecol., 1–13
  15. Driscoll, 2015, Life cycle assessment of the Maine and southwest Nova Scotia lobster industries, Fish. Res., 172, 385, 10.1016/j.fishres.2015.08.007 · DOI
  16. Farmery, 2015, Life cycle assessment of wild capture prawns: expanding sustainability considerations in the Australian Northern Prawn Fishery, J. Clean. Prod., 87, 96, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.063 · DOI
  17. Fréon, 2014, Environmentally extended comparison table of large- versus small- and medium-scale fisheries: the case of the Peruvian anchoveta fleet, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 71, 1459, 10.1139/cjfas-2013-0542 · DOI
  18. Fréon, 2014, Life cycle assessment of the Peruvian industrial anchoveta fleet: boundary setting in life cycle inventory analyses of complex and plural means of production, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 19, 1068, 10.1007/s11367-014-0716-3 · DOI
  19. Fréon, 2014, Harvesting for food versus feed: a review of Peruvian fisheries in a global context, Rev. Fish Biol. Fish., 24, 381, 10.1007/s11160-013-9336-4 · DOI
  20. Fréon, 2017, Life cycle assessment of three Peruvian fishmeal plants: toward a cleaner production, J. Clean. Prod., 145, 50, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.036 · DOI
  21. García-del-Hoyo, 2017, A demand analysis of the Spanish canned tuna market, Mar. Policy, 86, 127, 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.09.014 · DOI
  22. García-Santiago, 2020, Eco-efficiency of a marine biorefinery for valorization of cartilaginous fish biomass, J. Ind. Ecol., 1–13
  23. Hornborg, 2020, Carp (Cyprinidae) fisheries in Swedish Lakes: a combined environmental assessment approach to evaluate data-limited freshwater fish resources as food, Environ. Manag., 65, 232, 10.1007/s00267-019-01241-z · DOI
  24. Hospido, 2005, Life cycle environmental impacts of Spanish tuna fisheries, Fish. Res., 76, 174, 10.1016/j.fishres.2005.05.016 · DOI
  25. Hospido, 2006, Environmental assessment of canned tuna manufacture with a life-cycle perspective, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 47, 56, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2005.10.003 · DOI
  26. Huijbregts, 2017, ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 22, 138, 10.1007/s11367-016-1246-y · DOI · Paper page
  27. Iribarren, 2010, Carbon footprint of canned mussels from a business-to-consumer approach. A starting point for mussel processors and policy makers, Environ. Sci. Pol., 13, 509, 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.05.003 · DOI
  28. Iribarren, 2010, Life Cycle Assessment of fresh and canned mussel processing and consumption in Galicia (NW Spain), Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 55, 106, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.08.001 · DOI
  29. Iribarren, 2010, Revisiting the Life Cycle Assessment of mussels from a sectorial perspective, J. Clean. Prod., 18, 101, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.10.009 · DOI
  30. Iribarren, 2012, Life cycle assessment of aquaculture feed and application to the turbot sector, Int. J. Environ. Res., 6, 837
  31. Khan, 2018, Impact of a fishing moratorium on a tuna pole-and-line fishery in eastern Indonesia, Mar. Policy, 94, 143, 10.1016/j.marpol.2018.05.014 · DOI
  32. Korhonen, 2018, Circular economy: the concept and its limitations, Ecol. Econ., 143, 37, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Laso, 2017, Introducing life cycle thinking to define best available techniques for products: application to the anchovy canning industry, J. Clean. Prod., 155, 139, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.040 · DOI
  34. Laso, 2018, Finding an economic and environmental balance in value chains based on circular economy thinking: an eco-efficiency methodology applied to the fish canning industry, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 133, 428, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.02.004 · DOI
  35. Laso, 2018, Life cycle assessment of European anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) landed by purse seine vessels in northern Spain, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 23, 1107, 10.1007/s11367-017-1318-7 · DOI
  36. Lourguioui, 2017, A perspective for reducing environmental impacts of mussel culture in Algeria, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 22, 1266, 10.1007/s11367-017-1261-7 · DOI
  37. Medeiros, 2017, Life cycle assessment of fish and prawn production: comparison of monoculture and polyculture freshwater systems in Brazil, J. Clean. Prod., 156, 528, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.059 · DOI
  38. Mullon, 2009, Modeling the global fishmeal and fish oil markets, Nat. Resour. Model., 22, 564, 10.1111/j.1939-7445.2009.00053.x · DOI
  39. Niero, 2019, Coupling material circularity indicators and life cycle based indicators: a proposal to advance the assessment of circular economy strategies at the product level, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 140, 305, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.002 · DOI
  40. Parker, 2015, Fuel consumption of global fishing fleets: current understanding and knowledge gaps, Fish Fish., 16, 684, 10.1111/faf.12087 · DOI
  41. Parker, 2015, Fuel performance and carbon footprint of the global purse seine tuna fleet, J. Clean. Prod., 103, 517, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.017 · DOI
  42. Parker, 2018, Fuel use and greenhouse gas emissions of world fisheries, Nat. Clim. Chang., 8, 333, 10.1038/s41558-018-0117-x · DOI
  43. Philis, 2019, Comparing life cycle assessment (LCA) of salmonid aquaculture production systems: status and perspectives, Sustain., 11
  44. Philis, 2021, Quantifying environmental impacts of cleaner fish used as sea lice treatments in salmon aquaculture with life cycle assessment, J. Ind. Ecol., 1–14
  45. Ramos, 2011, Environmental assessment of the Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus) season in the Basque Country. Increasing the timeline delimitation in fishery LCA studies, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 16, 599, 10.1007/s11367-011-0304-8 · DOI
  46. Rufí-Salís, 2021, Combining LCA and circularity assessments in complex production systems: the case of urban agriculture, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 166, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105359 · DOI
  47. Ruiz-Salmón, 2021, Life cycle assessment of fish and seafood processed products — a review of methodologies and new challenges, Sci. Total Environ., 761, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144094 · DOI
  48. Sandison, 2021, The environmental impacts of pelagic fish caught by Scottish vessels, Fish. Res., 236, 10.1016/j.fishres.2020.105850 · DOI
  49. Svanes, 2011, Environmental assessment of cod (Gadus morhua) from autoline fisheries, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 16, 611, 10.1007/s11367-011-0298-2 · DOI
  50. Tamburini, 2019, Life cycle assessment of oyster farming in the po delta, Northern Italy, Resources, 8, 1, 10.3390/resources8040170 · DOI
  51. Tamburini, 2020, Sustainability of mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) farming in the Po River delta, northern Italy, based on a life cycle assessment approach, Sustain., 12
  52. Thrane, 2006, LCA of Danish fish products, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 11, 66, 10.1065/lca2006.01.232 · DOI
  53. Vázquez-Rowe, 2010, Life cycle assessment of horse mackerel fisheries in Galicia (NW Spain): comparative analysis of two major fishing methods, Fish. Res., 106, 517, 10.1016/j.fishres.2010.09.027 · DOI
  54. Vázquez-Rowe, 2011, Computation of operational and environmental benchmarks within selected galician fishing fleets, J. Ind. Ecol., 15, 776, 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00360.x · DOI
  55. Vázquez-Rowe, 2011, Life Cycle Assessment of fresh hake fillets captured by the Galician fleet in the Northern Stock, Fish. Res., 110, 128, 10.1016/j.fishres.2011.03.022 · DOI
  56. Vázquez-Rowe, 2012, Best practices in life cycle assessment implementation in fisheries. Improving and broadening environmental assessment for seafood production systems, Trends Food Sci. Technol., 28, 116, 10.1016/j.tifs.2012.07.003 · DOI
  57. Vázquez-Rowe, 2012, Environmental assessment of frozen common octopus (Octopus vulgaris) captured by Spanish fishing vessels in the Mauritanian EEZ, Mar. Policy, 36, 180, 10.1016/j.marpol.2011.05.002 · DOI
  58. Vázquez-Rowe, 2013, Carbon footprint analysis of goose barnacle (Pollicipes pollicipes) collection on the Galician coast (NW Spain), Fish. Res., 143, 191, 10.1016/j.fishres.2013.02.009 · DOI
  59. Vázquez-Rowe, 2013, Carbon footprint of a multi-ingredient seafood product from a business-to-business perspective, J. Clean. Prod., 44, 200, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.049 · DOI
  60. Vázquez-Rowe, 2014, Life cycle assessment of European pilchard (Sardina pilchardus) consumption. A case study for Galicia (NW Spain), Sci. Total Environ., 475, 48, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.099 · DOI
  61. Villanueva-Rey, 2018, The importance of using life cycle assessment in policy support to determine the sustainability of fishing fleets: a case study for the small-scale xeito fishery in Galicia, Spain, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 23, 1091, 10.1007/s11367-017-1402-z · DOI
  62. Wilson, 2020, Beyond protection: fisheries co-benefits of no-take marine reserves, Mar. Policy, 122, 10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104224 · DOI
  63. Yokokawa, 2018, Framework for analyzing the effects of packaging on food loss reduction by considering consumer behavior, J. Clean. Prod., 174, 26, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.242 · DOI
  64. Ziegler, 2003, Life Cycle Assessment of frozen cod fillets including fishery-specific environmental impacts, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 8, 39, 10.1007/BF02978747 · DOI
  65. Ziegler, 2013, The carbon footprint of Norwegian seafood products on the global seafood market, J. Ind. Ecol., 17, 103, 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00485.x · DOI
  66. Ziegler, 2016, Expanding the concept of sustainable seafood using Life Cycle Assessment, Fish Fish., 17, 1073, 10.1111/faf.12159 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cortés, A., Esteve-Llorens, X., González-García, S., Moreira, M. T., & Feijoo, G.
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-10
Volume
791
Pages
148249
ISSN
0048-9697
DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148249
Cited by
38
References
2
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • Xunta de Galicia
  • European Commission

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review