Oxy-Fuel Co-Combustion Dynamics of Phytoremediation Biomass and Textile Dyeing Sludge: Gas-to-Ash Pollution Abatement
Abstract
The environmental pressures of major wastes in the circular economies can be abated leveraging the complementarity and optimal conditions of their co-combustion. The oxy-fuel co-combustion of phytoremediation biomass of Sedum alfredii Hance (SAH) and textile dyeing sludge (TDS) may be a promising choice for sustainable CO 2 capture and a waste-to-energy conversion. This study characterized and quantified their co-combustion performances, kinetics, and interactions as a function of blend ratio, atmosphere type, and temperature. With a focus on the characteristic elements of SAH (Ca, K, Zn, and Cd) and TDS (Al and S), changes in the mineral phases and ash melting and slagging trends of K 2 O-Al 2 O 3-SiO 2 and CaO-Al 2 O 3-SiO 2 systems were quantified. The Zn and Cd residual rates of the co-combustion of 75% SAH and 25% TDS rose by 58.52% and 5.93%, respectively, in the oxy-fuel atmosphere at the 30% oxygen concentration, relative to the mono-combustion of SAH in the air atmosphere. The co-combustion in the oxy-fuel atmosphere at the 20% oxygen concentration delayed the release peaks of SO 2, C 2 S, and H 2 S, while the Ca-rich SAH captured S in TDS through the formation of CaSO 4. Our findings provide new and practical insights into the oxy-fuel co-combustion toward the enhanced co-circularity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Co-combusting algae-based fuels with coal, sludge, or oil shale reduces ignition temperatures, accelerates burnout rates, and enhances overall combustion performance.
“Beyond standalone pellets, algae-based fuels have been tested in dual-fuel applications, where they are co-combusted with coal, sludge, or oil shale [126-129].These combinations offer multiple advantages, such as reducing ignition temperatures, accelerating burnout rates, and enhancing overall combustion performance.”
From Algal-Based Carbonaceous Materials for Environmental Remediation: Advances in Wastewater Treatment, Carbon Sequestration, and Biofuel Applications (2025) · cites this paper as [128]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 61 · Cited by 64
- Authors
- Wu, X., Liu, J., Wei, Z., Chen, Z., Evrendilek, F., & Huang, W.
- Affiliations
- Guangdong University of Technology (CN)
- Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University (TR)
- Corresponding author
- Liu, Jingyong
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-06
- Volume
- 825
- Pages
- 153656
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4210948904
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 11
- FWCI
- 4.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (51978175)
- Scientific and Technological Planning Project of Guangzhou City (202103000004)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
- Keywords
- Sedum alfredii, textile dyeing sludge, waste-to-energy, heavy metal retention, combustion kinetics, blend ratio, circular economy
- MeSH terms
- Biodegradation, Environmental, Cadmium, Oxygen, Sewage, Silicon Dioxide, Textiles, Biomass
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review