Cited by 64Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesMunicipal Solid Waste Management

Oxy-Fuel Co-Combustion Dynamics of Phytoremediation Biomass and Textile Dyeing Sludge: Gas-to-Ash Pollution Abatement

Wu, Xieyuan, Liu, Jingyong, Wei, Zebin, Chen, Zihong, Evrendilek, Fatih, Huang, Wenxiao·2022·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

The environmental pressures of major wastes in the circular economies can be abated leveraging the complementarity and optimal conditions of their co-combustion. The oxy-fuel co-combustion of phytoremediation biomass of Sedum alfredii Hance (SAH) and textile dyeing sludge (TDS) may be a promising choice for sustainable CO 2 capture and a waste-to-energy conversion. This study characterized and quantified their co-combustion performances, kinetics, and interactions as a function of blend ratio, atmosphere type, and temperature. With a focus on the characteristic elements of SAH (Ca, K, Zn, and Cd) and TDS (Al and S), changes in the mineral phases and ash melting and slagging trends of K 2 O-Al 2 O 3-SiO 2 and CaO-Al 2 O 3-SiO 2 systems were quantified. The Zn and Cd residual rates of the co-combustion of 75% SAH and 25% TDS rose by 58.52% and 5.93%, respectively, in the oxy-fuel atmosphere at the 30% oxygen concentration, relative to the mono-combustion of SAH in the air atmosphere. The co-combustion in the oxy-fuel atmosphere at the 20% oxygen concentration delayed the release peaks of SO 2, C 2 S, and H 2 S, while the Ca-rich SAH captured S in TDS through the formation of CaSO 4. Our findings provide new and practical insights into the oxy-fuel co-combustion toward the enhanced co-circularity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153656

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 61 · Cited by 64

Authors
Wu, X., Liu, J., Wei, Z., Chen, Z., Evrendilek, F., & Huang, W.
Affiliations
  • Guangdong University of Technology (CN)
  • Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University (TR)
Corresponding author
Liu, Jingyong
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-06
Volume
825
Pages
153656
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210948904
Cited by
64
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 11
FWCI
4.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51978175)
  • Scientific and Technological Planning Project of Guangzhou City (202103000004)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
Keywords
Sedum alfredii, textile dyeing sludge, waste-to-energy, heavy metal retention, combustion kinetics, blend ratio, circular economy
MeSH terms
Biodegradation, Environmental, Cadmium, Oxygen, Sewage, Silicon Dioxide, Textiles, Biomass

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review