Cited by 104Heavy metals in environmentEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry StudiesMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactants

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 326 of the 326 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

RETRACTED: Mobilization of contaminants: Potential for soil remediation and unintended consequences

Open access

Abstract

Land treatment has become an essential waste management practice. Therefore, soil becomes a major source of contaminants including organic chemicals and potentially toxic elements (PTEs) which enter the food chain, primarily through leaching to potable water sources, plant uptake, and animal transfer. A range of soil amendments are used to manage the mobility of contaminants and subsequently their bioavailability. Various soil amendments, like desorbing agents, surfactants, and chelating agents, have been applied to increase contaminant mobility and bioavailability. These mobilizing agents are applied to increase the contaminant removal though phytoremediation, bioremediation, and soil washing. However, possible leaching of the mobilized pollutants during soil washing is a major limitation, particularly when there is no active plant uptake. This leads to groundwater contamination and toxicity to plants and soil biota. In this context, the present review provides an overview on various soil amendments used to enhance the bioavailability and mobility of organic and inorganic contaminants, thereby facilitating increased risk when soil is remediated in polluted areas. The unintended consequences of the mobilization methods, when used to remediate polluted sites, are discussed in relation to the leaching of mobilized contaminants when active plant growth is absent. The toxicity of targeted and non-targeted contaminants to microbial communities and higher plants is also discussed. Finally, this review work summarizes the existing research gaps in various contaminant mobilization approaches, and prospects for future research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156373This paper is marked retracted.

Cites

326 of 326 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

3 retracted

Items 201–326 of 326

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Du, 2022, Microbial metabolic limitation of rhizosphere under heavy metal stress: evidence from soil ecoenzymatic stoichiometry, Environ. Pollut., 300
  2. Guarino, 2019, Investigation and assessment for an effective approach to the reclamation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAHs) contaminated site: SIN bagnoli, Italy Sci. Rep., 9, 1
  3. Purwanti, 2017, Bioremediation of trivalent chromium in soil using bacteria, Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res., 12, 9346

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 104

Metadata

Authors
Kumar, M., Bolan, N., Jasemizad, T., Padhye, L. P., Sridharan, S., Singh, L., Bolan, S., O'Connor, J., Zhao, H., Shaheen, S. M., Song, H., Siddique, K. H. M., Wang, H., Kirkham, M. B., & Rinklebe, J.
Affiliations
  • National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (IN)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • University of Wuppertal (DE)
  • Sejong University (KR)
  • Zhejiang A & F University (CN)
  • Kansas State University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Bolan, Nanthi
  • Rinklebe, Jörg
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-09
Volume
839
Pages
156373
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4281734923
Cited by
104
References
326
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 12
FWCI
5.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IR@NEERI (CSIR-URDIP) (submittedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants
Keywords
contaminant mobilization, soil remediation, soil amendment, potentially toxic elements, organic pollutants, bioavailability, contaminant leaching, groundwater contamination, phytoremediation, bioremediation, soil washing, surfactants, chelating agents, unintended consequences, phytotoxicity, microbial toxicity, food chain contamination
MeSH terms
Animals, Biodegradation, Environmental, Organic Chemicals, Plants, Soil, Soil Pollutants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review