Replacing animal-derived components in in vitro test guidelines OECD 455 and 487
Abstract
The evaluation of single substances or environmental samples for their genotoxic or estrogenic potential is highly relevant for human- and environment-related risk assessment. To examine the effects on a mechanism-specific level, standardized cell-based in vitro methods are widely applied. However, these methods include animal-derived components like fetal bovine serum (FBS) or rat-derived liver homogenate fractions (S9-mixes), which are a source of variability, reduced assay reproducibility and ethical concerns. In our study, we evaluated the adaptation of the cell-based in vitro OECD test guidelines TG 487 (assessment of genotoxicity) and TG 455 (detection of estrogenic activity) to an animal-component-free methodology. Firstly, the human cell lines A549 (for OECD TG 487), ERα-CALUX® and GeneBLAzer™ ERα-UAS-bla GripTite™ (for OECD TG 455) were investigated for growth in a chemically defined medium without the addition of FBS. Secondly, the biotechnological S9-mix ewoS9R was implemented in comparison to the induced rat liver S9 to simulate in vivo metabolism capacities in both OECD test guidelines. As a model compound, Benzo[a]pyrene was used due to its increased genotoxicity and endocrine activity after metabolization. The metabolization of Benzo[a]Pyrene by S9-mixes was examined via chemical analysis. All cell lines (A549, ERα-CALUX® and GeneBLAzer™ Erα-UAS-bla GripTite™) were successfully cultivated in chemically defined media without FBS. The micronucleus assay could not…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Replacing major components, such as serum, ECM preparations or metabolic activation systems, may alter assay biology.
“Moreover, replacing major components, such as serum, ECM preparations or metabolic activation systems may alter assay biology. Changes in baseline phenotype, sensitivity, or readouts, have been reported even when technical adaptation is successful (Perez-Diaz et al., 2023; Reichstein et al., 2023; Fraser et al., 2025).”
From Challenges and solutions in transitioning to animal-free standards: a comprehensive analysis of components in human cell-based developmental neurotoxicity assays (2026) · cites this paper as Reichstein et al., 2023
Changes in baseline phenotype, sensitivity, or readouts have been reported even when technical adaptation is successful.
“Moreover, replacing major components, such as serum, ECM preparations or metabolic activation systems may alter assay biology. Changes in baseline phenotype, sensitivity, or readouts, have been reported even when technical adaptation is successful (Perez-Diaz et al., 2023; Reichstein et al., 2023; Fraser et al., 2025).”
From Challenges and solutions in transitioning to animal-free standards: a comprehensive analysis of components in human cell-based developmental neurotoxicity assays (2026) · cites this paper as Reichstein et al., 2023
Cites
In Vitro research Reproducibility: Keeping up High Standards
Hirsch, C., & Schildknecht, S. (2019) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2019.01484 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Reproducibility: Respect Your Cells!
Baker, M. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/537433a · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Weber, T., Bajramovic, J., & Oredsson, S. (2024) · MethodsX · doi:10.1016/j.mex.2024.102592 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Spänle, J. V., Haiber, L. M., & Seeger, B. (2026) · Frontiers in Toxicology · doi:10.3389/ftox.2026.1800157 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Reichstein, I. S., König, M., Wojtysiak, N., Escher, B. I., Henneberger, L., Behnisch, P., Besselink, H., Thalmann, B., Colas, J., Hörchner, S., Hollert, H., & Schiwy, A.
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-04
- Volume
- 868
- Pages
- 161454
- ISSN
- 0048-9697
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
- Licence
- Funders
- National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC/C020104/1)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review