Cited by 19Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactRecycling and Waste Management Techniques

Risk assessment and partitioning behavior of PFASs in environmental matrices from an e-waste recycling area

Hu, Hongfei, Zeng, Xiang, Zheng, Keyang, Zeng, Zhijun, Dai, Chenxu, Huo, Xia·2023·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

Objective Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS) contamination and their human exposure risks are a major concern. However, knowledge of PFAS contamination in environments near e-waste recycling sites and their health risk assessment are scarce. Methods We measured the concentrations of PFASs in soil (n = 12), water (n = 12) and atmospheric samples (n = 26) by LCP-MS/MS, analyzed the source apportionment of PFASs by PCA, and investigated the child health risk assessment from an e-waste recycling area (Guiyu) and a reference area (Haojiang). Results We found high concentrations of PFASs in the atmosphere and low concentrations of PFASs in soil. The average concentration of perfluoro-n-heptanoic acid (PFHpA) (9.43 ng/L) was highest among PFASs in water. The concentrations PFASs in the atmosphere and water were higher in the e-waste recycling area than in the reference area (p Conclusion The concentrations of PFASs in the water and atmosphere are higher in the e-waste recycling site than in the reference area. We found that their intake affected growth and development in children. We need to reduce pollution from PFASs in the e-waste recycling area while maintaining a focus on their impact on child health.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167707

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hu, H., Zeng, X., Zheng, K., Zeng, Z., Dai, C., & Huo, X.
Affiliations
  • Jinan University (CN)
  • Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Huo, Xia
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-12
Volume
905
Pages
167707
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387477281
Cited by
19
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22376079)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province (2020A1515110858)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
Keywords
PFAS, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, e-waste recycling, Guiyu, source apportionment, health risk assessment, child health, perfluorooctanoic acid, perfluorobutanoic acid, PFBS
MeSH terms
Child, China, Environmental Monitoring, Fluorocarbons, Humans, Soil, Water, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Risk Assessment, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Recycling, Electronic Waste

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review