Cited by 260Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchLandfill Environmental Impact StudiesPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts

Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Landfill Leachate: Patterns, Time Trends, and Sources

Benskin, Jonathan P., Li, Belinda, Ikonomou, Michael G., Grace, John R., Li, Loretta Y.·2012·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Concentrations and isomer profiles for 24 per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) were monitored over 5 months (February-June, 2010) in municipal landfill leachate. These data were used to assess the role of perfluoroalkyl acid (PFAA) precursor degradation on changes in PFAA concentrations over time. The influence of total organic carbon, total suspended solids, pH, electrical conductivity (EC), leachate flow rates, and meteorological data (precipitation, air temperature) on leachate PFAS concentrations was also investigated. Perfluoropentanoate and perfluorohexanoate were typically the dominant PFASs in leachate, except for March-April, when concentrations of perfluorooctane sulfonate, perfluorooctanoate, and numerous PFAA-precursors (i.e., (N-alkyl) perfluorooctane sulfonamides and fluorotelomer carboxylic acids) increased by a factor of 2-10 (~4 μg/L to ~36 μg/L ΣPFASs). During this time, isomer profiles of PFOA became increasingly dominated by the linear isomer, likely from transformation of linear, telomer-manufactured precursors. While ΣPFAA-precursors accounted for up to 71% of ΣPFASs (molar basis) in leachate from this site, leachate from a second landfill displayed only low concentrations of precursors (<1% of ΣPFASs). Overall, degradation of PFAA-precursors and changes in leachate pH, EC, and 24-h precipitation were important factors controlling PFAS occurrence in leachate. Finally, 8.5-25 kg/yr (mean 16 kg/yr) of ΣPFASs was estimated to leave the landfill via leachate for subsequent treatment at a wastewater treatment plant.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es302471n

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Benskin, J. P., Li, B., Ikonomou, M. G., Grace, J. R., & Li, L. Y.
Affiliations
  • Fisheries and Oceans Canada (CA)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Benskin, Jonathan P.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2012-10-23
Volume
46
Issue
21
Pages
11532-11540
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2324583584
Cited by
258
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5
FWCI
4.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Keywords
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, landfill leachate, PFAS degradation, perfluorooctanoic acid, PFOS, fluorotelomer carboxylic acids, perfluorooctane sulfonamide, precipitation effects, municipal solid waste landfill
MeSH terms
Environmental Monitoring, Fluorocarbons, Refuse Disposal, Time Factors, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Alkanesulfonic Acids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review