Cited by 18Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterialsAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal

Remediation of PFAS-impacted soils using magnetic activated carbon (MAC) and hydrothermal alkaline treatment (HALT)

Open access
Shih, Chih-Hsuan, Kim, Jinha, Yang, Shih-Hung, Soker, Ori, Strathmann, Timothy J., Chu, Kung-Hui·2024·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a group of synthetic pollutants that are bioaccumulative, toxic, and persistent. One long-term source for PFAS release is PFAS-contaminated soil. Addition of activated carbon (AC) to soil has shown the potential to immobilize PFAS and reduce PFAS bioavailability, but PFAS-loaded spent AC remaining in the treated soil could lead to remobilization. Here we report a novel approach to address this challenge. By applying magnetic activated carbon (MAC) to remediate PFAS-impacted soil, the PFAS-loaded MAC can be retrieved from the treated soil and sorbed PFAS in the spent MAC can be destroyed using hydrothermal alkaline treatment (HALT). Effective MAC recovery was observed when water/soil ratios (w/w) were either <0.07 or > 1. Soil organic content and pH affected PFAS adsorption by the MAC added to soil. After three months of incubation with MAC, high PFAS removals [PFOS (87.6 %), PFOA (83.8 %), and 6:2 FTSA (81.5 %)] were observed for acidic environmental sandy soils with low organic content. In contrast, PFAS removal by MAC was poor for garden soils with high organic matter content. MAC was also used to remediate aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF)-impacted and PFAS-contaminated aged soils with varying PFAS removal performance. HALT technology was able to destroy and defluorinate PFAS adsorbed to the spent MAC. Additionally, the HALT-treated MAC retained its magnetic properties and PFOS sorption capacity, suggesting the potential reusability of HALT-treated MAC. Considering the low energy footprint of HALT compared to conventional PFAS thermal destruction techniques, the combination of MAC and HALT could be a promising treatment train for PFAS-contaminated soils.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168931

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shih, C.-H., Kim, J., Yang, S.-H., Soker, O., Strathmann, T. J., & Chu, K.-H.
Affiliations
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • Colorado School of Mines (US)
Corresponding author
Chu, Kung-Hui
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-02
Volume
912
Pages
168931
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4389208441
Cited by
18
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Texas A and M University
  • Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (ER22-3124, ER18-1501)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
Keywords
magnetic activated carbon, PFAS destruction, PFOS, perfluorooctanoic acid, aqueous film-forming foam, PFAS adsorption, soil organic matter, soil pH, aged soil, soil remediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review