Cited by 52Carbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalIndustrial Gas Emission Control

Low temperature and facile synthesis of nitrogen-doped hierarchical porous carbon derived from waste polyethylene terephthalate for efficient CO2 capture

Zhou, Shaojie, Xu, Haiyang, Wang, Shurong, Feng, Hongyu, Hu, Yanjun, Zhang, Shicheng·2024·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

Waste polyethylene terephthalate (PET) with high carbon content (>60 wt%) has shown great potential in the field of synthesizing carbon materials for CO 2 capture, attracting increasing attention. Herein, an innovative strategy was proposed to synthesize nitrogen-doped hierarchical porous carbon (PC) for CO 2 capture using PET as precursor and sodium amide (NaNH 2) as both nitrogen dopant and low-temperature activator. As-synthesized N-doped PC exhibited a significantly high micropore volume of 0.755 cm 3/g and a rich content of N- and O-containing functional groups, offering ample active sites for CO 2 molecules. Further, the adsorbents demonstrated excellent CO 2 capture capacity, achieving 5.7 mmol/g (0 °C) and 3.3 mmol/g (25 °C) at 1 bar, respectively. This was primarily attributed to the synergistic effect of narrow micropores filling and electrostatic interactions. Moreover, as-synthesized PC exhibited rapid CO 2 adsorption capability, and its dynamic adsorption process was effectively described using a pseudo-second-order kinetic model. After five consecutive cycles, PET-derived PC still maintained ~100 % of adsorption capacity. They also possessed good CO 2/N 2 selectivity and reasonable isosteric heat of adsorption. Therefore, as-synthesized nitrogen-doped PC is a promising CO 2 adsorbent through low-temperature activation of carbonized PET with NaNH 2. Such findings have substantial implications for waste plastic recycling and mitigating the greenhouse effect.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169856

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Under 1 bar adsorption conditions, the material exhibited outstanding CO2 capture performance, attributed to the synergistic effect of narrow micropore confinement and surface polar sites.

    “Under 1 bar adsorption conditions, the material exhibited outstanding CO 2 capture performance, attributed to the synergistic effect of narrow micropore confinement and surface polar sites.”
  • The resulting porous carbon possessed an ultrahigh specific surface area (>2,200 m2/g), significant micropore volume (0.755 cm3/g), and was rich in nitrogen (1.39 wt%) and oxygen (19.19 wt%) functional groups.

    “Characterization revealed that the resulting porous carbon possessed an ultrahigh specific surface area (> 2,200 m 2 /g), significant micropore volume (0.755 cm 3 /g), and was rich in nitrogen (1.39 wt%) and oxygen (19.19 wt%) functional groups.”
  • Sodium amide used simultaneously as a nitrogen dopant and low-temperature activating agent optimized the pore structure and significantly boosted the CO2 adsorption capacity of PET-derived porous carbon.

    “The introduction of NaNH 2 effectively optimized the pore structure, significantly boosting the material's CO 2 adsorption capacity (Fig. 9a).”
  • The adsorption kinetics followed a pseudo-second-order model, and the material combined excellent cycling stability (no capacity decay after five cycles), high CO2/N2 selectivity, and moderate isosteric heat of adsorption.

    “The adsorption kinetics followed a pseudo-second-order model, and the material combined excellent cycling stability (no capacity decay after five cycles), high CO 2 /N 2 selectivity, and moderate isosteric heat of adsorption.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 67 · Cited by 52

Authors
Zhou, S., Xu, H., Wang, S., Feng, H., Hu, Y., & Zhang, S.
Affiliations
  • State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization (CN)
  • Jiaxing Nanhu University (CN)
  • Zhejiang University of Technology (CN)
  • Fudan University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Shurong
  • Hu, Yanjun
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-03
Volume
914
Pages
169856
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4390636611
Cited by
52
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 13
FWCI
6.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province (2022C03092)
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2023M733060)
  • National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (51725603)
  • State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization (ZJUCEU2022011)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Industrial Gas Emission Control
Keywords
polyethylene terephthalate, CO2 capture, low-temperature carbonization, waste plastic recycling, microporous carbon, CO2 adsorption kinetics, CO2/N2 selectivity, adsorbent reusability, electrostatic interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review