Evaluating urban ecosystem resilience using the DPSIR framework and the ENA model: A case study of 35 cities in China
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
DPSIR model, proposed by OECD in 1993, is a system analysis tool based on causal relationships.
“DPSIR model, proposed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in 1993, is a system analysis tool based on causal relationships [38].”
From Evaluation of Mine Land Ecological Resilience: Application of the Vague Sets Model Under the Nature-Based Solutions Framework (2025) · cites this paper as [38]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Feng, L., Xie, J., & Ke, Y. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su18010164 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhao, R., Fang, C., Liu, H., & Liu, X.
- Affiliations
- Xinjiang University (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Capital University of Economics and Business (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhao, Ruidong
- Fang, Chuanglin
- Venue
- Sustainable Cities and Society
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-09
- Volume
- 72
- Pages
- 102997
- ISSN
- 2210-6707 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3160477593
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 43 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 16.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Sustainable Cities and Society (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (41590840, 41590842)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental Quality and Pollution
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Research studies in Vietnam
- Keywords
- DPSIR framework, ecological network analysis, urban ecological network, ecological security, environmental vulnerability, ecological risk, urbanization, Chinese cities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
