Cited by 1Geology and Environmental Impact StudiesEnvironmental Quality and PollutionResearch studies in Vietnam

Evaluation of Mine Land Ecological Resilience: Application of the Vague Sets Model Under the Nature-Based Solutions Framework

Open access
Feng, Lu, Xie, Jing, Ke, Yuxian·2025·Sustainability

Abstract

To achieve a scientific evaluation of land ecological resilience in mining areas and promote the green transformation and sustainable development of the mining industry, this study is based on the core concept of Nature-based Solutions (NbS), coupling the “Driving force–Pressure–State–Impact–Response” (DPSIR) framework, and constructs an evaluation system for mine land ecological resilience (MLER) focusing on sustainability. This system covers multiple aspects, including natural ecology, socio-economics, and policy management, comprising 21 secondary indicators that comprehensively respond to NbS’ fundamental principles of “nature-guided, multi-party collaboration, and long-term adaptation.” In terms of evaluation methodology, this study proposes a combined weighting model that integrates AHP-CRITIC game theory with Vague sets. First, subjective expert experience and objective data variance are balanced through combined weighting. Based on game theory, the optimal combination coefficients were determined (α1 = 0.624, α2 = 0.376) to reconcile subjective and objective preferences. Subsequently, the three-dimensional interval structure of Vague sets is utilized to effectively accommodate fuzzy information and data gaps. By characterizing the restoration process through interval membership, the model enhances the representational capacity of the evaluation results regarding complex ecological information. Empirical research conducted in the mining areas of Gan Xian, Xing Guo, Yu Du, and Xun Wu in Jiangxi Province effectively identified differences in resilience levels: the resilience of the Xing Guo mining area was classified as I, Gan Xian and Yu Du as II, and Xun Wu as IV. These results are fundamentally consistent with the AHP-Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation method, verifying the robustness and reliability of the model. The NbS-guided evaluation system and model constructed in this study provide scientific tools for identifying differences in the sustainability of MLER and key constraints, promoting the transformation of restoration models from “engineering-driven” to “nature-driven, long-term adaptation” in the context of NbS in China.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This study builds a mine land ecological resilience (MLER) evaluation system by coupling Nature-based Solutions (NbS) with the DPSIR framework and applying AHP-CRITIC game-theoretic combined weighting plus Vague sets. In four Jiangxi mining areas, it classifies Xing Guo as level I, Gan Xian and Yu Du as level II, and Xun Wu as level IV, with results broadly consistent with AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation.

Key findings

  • The combined weighting coefficients from game theory were α1 = 0.624 and α2 = 0.376; combined weights ranged from 0.033 to 0.057 with an extreme difference of only 0.024, avoiding the over-prominence of indicators such as D4 (0.068) and I3 (0.061) under multiplicative synthesis and the excessive weakening of R4 (0.024) and D2 (0.036).
  • MLER levels differed across sites: Xing Guo was classified as I with interval membership [0.3327, 0.4285]; Gan Xian as II with [0.3177, 0.3922]; Yu Du as II with [0.2772, 0.4010]; and Xun Wu as IV with [0.3451, 0.4199].
  • For Gan Xian, the Vague sets model gave a final level of II, with I interval [0.2759, 0.3504] and II interval [0.3177, 0.3922] overlapping from 0.3177 to 0.3504; the AHP-fuzzy comprehensive method also gave II, with membership values I = 0.307, II = 0.348, III = 0.245, IV = 0.067, V = 0.033.
  • Dimension weights differed by method: AHP subjective weights for D, P, S, I, R were 0.178, 0.199, 0.236, 0.183, 0.204; CRITIC objective weights were 0.198, 0.193, 0.233, 0.130, 0.246; combined weights were 0.186, 0.197, 0.235, 0.163, 0.220.

Methods

  • The study constructs an MLER evaluation indicator system under the NbS concept and DPSIR framework, comprising 21 secondary indicators across five dimensions: driving forces, pressures, state, impacts, and responses.
  • Data include meteorological bulletins, regional meteorological station monitoring, statistical yearbooks for population density and GDP, and Delphi-based expert scoring for qualitative indicators such as soil health and vegetation community structure.
  • The model uses AHP for subjective weights, CRITIC for objective weights, game theory for combined weighting, and Vague sets to calculate interval membership degrees across evaluation levels; empirical application covers Gan Xian, Xing Guo, Yu Du, and Xun Wu in Jiangxi Province, with comparison against least squares, multiplicative synthesis, and AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation.

Limitations

  • The paper states that the model is built on static data and struggles to accurately depict long-term dynamic processes such as soil fertility accumulation and vegetation succession; future work could introduce time-series Vague sets or couple the model with machine learning.
  • The paper states that validation samples are concentrated in non-ferrous metal mining areas in humid Southern China, so universality for coal mines in northern arid regions and salt lake mines on high-altitude plateaus requires further improvement.
  • Evident from the text: qualitative indicators rely on expert Delphi scoring, and the case validation is limited to four mining areas, so broader cross-regional and cross-mineral robustness remains untested beyond the stated sample.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su18010164

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 8 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingreasoning

    The combined weighting system reconciles the discrepancies between subjective and objective weights in dimensions such as Driver (D) and Response (R).

    “The system not only reconciles the discrepancies between subjective and objective weights in dimensions such as Driver (D) and Response (R) and corrects the evaluation bias in the Impact (I) dimension, but also accurately preserves the subjective-objective consensus regarding the State (S) dimension as the core of the evaluation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    The optimal combination coefficients determined by game theory are α1 = 0.624 and α2 = 0.376.

    “Based on game theory, the optimal combination coefficients were determined (α 1 = 0.624, α 2 = 0.376) to reconcile subjective and objective preferences.”
    • Also stated in: § 4.4. Weight Calculation for the MLER Model · plain
      “Finally, according to Equation ( 15), the combined weighting coefficients are determined as α 1 = 0.624, α 2 = 0.376.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    The AHP-Fuzzy comprehensive represents the degree of support using a single membership degree II (0.348), making it difficult to capture the uncertainty and ambiguity inherent in the evaluation process.

    “The AHP-Fuzzy comprehensive represents the degree of support using a single membership degree II (0.348), making it difficult to capture the uncertainty and ambiguity inherent in the evaluation process.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The evaluation grades of MLER in the four selected study areas exhibit distinct differentiation.

    “The evaluation grades of MLER in the four selected study areas exhibit distinct differentiation, as shown in Figure 10.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The four selected mining areas (Xing Guo, Gan Xian, Yu Du, Xun Wu) are comparable and representative for evaluating differences in MLER.
  • Findingreasoning

    The integrated method significantly enhances the weights of key indicators that are easily weakened by single methods, such as Green investment structure (D2), Stakeholder synergy (R5), and Community succession stage (S5).

    “Crucially, this integrated method significantly enhances the weights of key indicators that are easily weakened by single methods-such as Green investment structure (D2), Stakeholder synergy (R5), and Community succession stage (S5)-thereby more comprehensively capturing the complexity and multi-dimensional correlations within mine ecological restoration systems.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 38
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 14
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Gan Xian's II interval of [0.3177, 0.3922] is dominant and overlaps with the I interval.

    “Specifically, Gan Xian's”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Compared to AHP subjective weights, the CRITIC method assigns a higher weight to the Driver (D) dimension and significantly reduces the weight of the Impact (I) dimension.

    “Compared to the AHP subjective weights, the CRITIC method assigns a higher weight to the Driver (D) dimension while significantly reducing the weight of the Impact (I) dimension.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    This system includes 21 secondary indicators across five dimensions-drivers, pressure, state, impact, and response-breaking through the traditional limitation of focusing on short-term restoration while neglecting long-term sustainability.

    “This system includes 21 secondary indicators across five dimensions-drivers, pressure, state, impact, and response-breaking through the traditional limitation of focusing on short-term restoration while neglecting long-term sustainability.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The study constructs an MLER evaluation system based on NbS and DPSIR, covering natural ecology, socio-economics, and policy management, with 21 secondary indicators.

    “This system covers multiple aspects, including natural ecology, socio-economics, and policy management, comprising 21 secondary indicators that comprehensively respond to NbS' fundamental principles of “nature-guided, multi-party collaboration, and long-term adaptation.””
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [44] Wen, 2023, Application of Spatial Analytical Methods to Nature-based Solutions: Review of Research Progress, South Archit.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    The Xun Wu mining area ranks highest in the IV category with an interval membership of [0.3451, 0.4199].

    “In contrast, the Xun Wu mining area ranks highest in the”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The four selected mining areas (Xing Guo, Gan Xian, Yu Du, Xun Wu) are comparable and representative for evaluating differences in MLER.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The weights derived from the multiplicative synthesis method exhibit significant extreme differences; for instance, D4 reaches 0.068 while R4 is only 0.024.

    “The weights derived from the multiplicative synthesis method exhibit significant extreme differences; for instance, D4 (Natural adaptability of restoration technology) reaches 0.068 while R4 (GDP) is only 0.024.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Although the Least Squares Method shows smaller fluctuations, it fails to sufficiently distinguish core indicators from secondary ones, as evidenced by the nearly identical weights assigned to S3 and D3.

    “Although the Least Squares Method shows smaller fluctuations, it fails to sufficiently distinguish core indicators from secondary ones, as evidenced by the nearly identical weights assigned to S3 (Soil fertility level) and D3 (In-depth community participation in decision-making).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The weights generated by the game theory-based combination are concentrated within the range of 0.033-0.057, with an extreme difference of only 0.024.

    “In contrast, the weights generated by the game theory-based combination are concentrated within the range of 0.033-0.057,with an extreme difference of only 0.024.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Yu Du's II interval has the widest coverage, but its stability is slightly compromised by constraints from local indicators.

    “While Yu Du's”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The Xing Guo mining area is classified as I, with the highest interval membership degree of [0.3327, 0.4285].

    “The Xing Guo mining area is classified as I, with the highest interval membership degree of [0.3327, 0.4285].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The four selected mining areas (Xing Guo, Gan Xian, Yu Du, Xun Wu) are comparable and representative for evaluating differences in MLER.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Both Gan Xian and Yu Du mining areas are classified as II.

    “Both Gan Xian and Yu Du mining areas are classified as II.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The four selected mining areas (Xing Guo, Gan Xian, Yu Du, Xun Wu) are comparable and representative for evaluating differences in MLER.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Indicators R1 (Intensity of restoration investment), P2 (Annual average temperature grade), and D4 (Natural adaptability of restoration technology) exhibit higher weights.

    “Specifically, indicators such as R1 (Intensity of restoration investment), P2 (Annual average temperature grade), and D4 (Natural adaptability of restoration technology) exhibit higher weights.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingreasoning

    This research proposes a coupled evaluation model utilizing AHP-CRITIC game theory-based combined weighting and Vague sets, with the sustainable philosophy of NbS at its core.

    “This research proposes a coupled evaluation model utilizing AHP-CRITIC game theory-based combined weighting and Vague sets, with the sustainable philosophy of NbS at its core.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The results show that Xing Guo mining areas have a I level of MLER, the Gan Xian and Yu Du mining areas have a II level of MLER, while the Xun Wu mining area is rated as IV, providing a scientific basis for the localization of the NbS concept and the formulation of differentiated restoration strategies.

    “The results show that Xing Guo mining areas have a”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The four selected mining areas (Xing Guo, Gan Xian, Yu Du, Xun Wu) are comparable and representative for evaluating differences in MLER.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The empirical research in four mining areas of Jiangxi Province validates the effectiveness of the NbS-guided evaluation model and reveals significant differences in ecological restoration capacity across the areas.

    “The empirical research in four mining areas of Jiangxi Province validates the effectiveness of the NbS-guided evaluation model and reveals significant differences in ecological restoration capacity across the areas.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The four selected mining areas (Xing Guo, Gan Xian, Yu Du, Xun Wu) are comparable and representative for evaluating differences in MLER.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    This study verifies the applicability of the Vague sets in evaluating MLER, yet certain limitations remain.

    “This study verifies the applicability of the Vague sets in evaluating MLER, yet certain limitations remain.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The system achieves a restoration-social adaptation-economic feasibility sustainable goal, providing a targeted evaluation tool for ecological restoration in mining areas.

    “It achieves a”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    In MLER evaluation, the DPSIR framework forms a systematic assessment path through its complete causal chain, covering the entire process from developmental disturbances and ecological restoration to sustainable maintenance, avoiding shortcomings of traditional evaluation indicators in logical coherence.

    “In the evaluation of MLER, the DPSIR framework forms a systematic assessment path through its complete causal chain.It comprehensively covers the entire process from developmental disturbances and ecological restoration to the sustainable maintenance of the system, effectively avoiding the shortcomings of traditional evaluation indicators in terms of logical coherence.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The model has not yet systematically covered mining areas with different climatic backgrounds and deposit types, such as coal mines in arid regions or salt lake mines on high-altitude plateaus; thus, its universality and robustness require broader validation.

    “It has not yet systematically covered mining areas with different climatic backgrounds and deposit types, such as coal mines in arid regions or salt lake mines on high-altitude plateaus; thus, its universality and robustness require broader validation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This weight structure reflects a prioritization of current ecosystem status and its associated effects, aligning with common tendency in practical assessments to emphasize existing ecological conditions.

    “This weight structure reflects a prioritization of the current ecosystem status and its associated effects, which aligns with the common tendency in practical assessments to emphasize existing ecological conditions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The AHP consistency test ensures judgment results align better with the actual situation.

    “To ensure that the judgment results align better with the actual situation, the consistency ratio can be determined using Formula (8).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning

    The Vague sets three-dimensional interval structure enhances representational capacity of evaluation results regarding complex ecological information.

    “By characterizing the restoration process through interval membership, the model enhances the representational capacity of the evaluation results regarding complex ecological information.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The CRITIC weights provide a quantitative basis grounded in data variance for the subsequent subjective-objective combined weighting, ultimately enhancing the scientific rigor and balance of the evaluation system.

    “It provides a quantitative basis grounded in data variance for the subsequent subjective-objective combined weighting, ultimately enhancing the scientific rigor and balance of the evaluation system.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The Xing Guo mining area's ecosystem structure and functions are close to their original states, characterized by deep implementation of NbS concepts and well-established driver-response mechanisms.

    “Its ecosystem structure and functions are close to their original states, characterized by deep implementation of NbS concepts and well-established driver-response mechanisms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The NbS-guided evaluation system and model provide scientific tools for identifying differences in sustainability of MLER and key constraints, promoting transformation of restoration models from engineering-driven to nature-driven, long-term adaptation in China.

    “The NbS-guided evaluation system and model constructed in this study provide scientific tools for identifying differences in the sustainability of MLER and key constraints, promoting the transformation of restoration models from “engineering-driven” to “nature-driven, long-term adaptation” in the context of NbS in China.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    CRITIC method does not rely on expert subjective judgment, but analyzes data patterns to objectively determine weights, retaining original information.

    “The core advantage of this method is that it does not rely on expert subjective judgment, but instead analyzes the data patterns of the indicators themselves, namely the contrast strength and conflict degree, to objectively determine the weights of each indicator, thus retaining the original information of the data to the greatest extent.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These shortcomings lead to a lack of numerical support for high-grade intervals and a relatively high proportion of membership in lower-grade intervals in Xun Wu.

    “This leads to a lack of numerical support for high-grade intervals and a relatively high proportion of membership in lower-grade intervals.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The NbS framework is oriented towards addressing social challenges, prompting a shift in restoration objectives from traditional reclamation to overall enhancement of land system resilience.

    “The NbS framework is oriented towards addressing social challenges, prompting a shift in restoration objectives from traditional reclamation to the overall enhancement of land system resilience [33].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [33] Hong, L., Feng, S., Li, P., and Wang, A. (2025). Ecological Restoration and Regeneration Strategies for the Gumi Mountain Mining Area in Wuhan Guided by Nature-Based Solution (NbS) Concepts. Sustainability, 17. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The relatively lower weight of the Driver dimension may lead to insufficient attention to critical drivers such as policy guidance and resource investment.

    “In the current weighting system, the relatively lower weight of the Driver dimension may lead to insufficient attention to critical drivers such as policy guidance and resource investment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Vague sets comprehensively incorporate ambiguous and missing information, mitigating subjective bias and ensuring robustness under data incompleteness.

    “This framework comprehensively incorporates ambiguous and missing information during the evaluation process, effectively mitigating subjective bias and ensuring the robustness of results even under conditions of data incompleteness [21].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21] Yang, D., and Tsai, W.-T. (2024). Linear Consensus Protocol Based on Vague Sets and Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Methods. Electronics, 13. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    The DPSIR framework possesses good dynamic adaptability, allowing flexible adjustments according to different stages of mining restoration, overcoming insufficient adaptability of static indicators during long-term evolution.

    “This framework also possesses good dynamic adaptability, allowing for flexible adjustments to the evaluation content according to the different stages of mining restoration, thus overcoming the issue of insufficient adaptability of static indicators during long-term evolution.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    The game-theoretic combination weighting method introduces a competitive mechanism to seek an equilibrium state between attributes, achieving a more rational weight distribution.

    “In terms of weight determination, the game-theoretic combination weighting method introduces a competitive mechanism to seek an equilibrium state between the attributes, thereby achieving a more rational weight distribution.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    MLER is not a single fixed value.

    “Given that MLER is not a single fixed value, Vague sets utilize interval-based membership degrees to characterize the transitional states between different restoration levels.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In contrast, the AHP-Fuzzy comprehensive expressed the membership degree of each grade with discrete values, ignored the continuity of grade boundaries, and was prone to causing misjudgment of boundary samples.

    “In contrast, the AHP-Fuzzy comprehensive expressed the membership degree of each grade with discrete values, ignored the continuity of grade boundaries, and was prone to causing misjudgment of boundary samples.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    DPSIR model, proposed by OECD in 1993, is a system analysis tool based on causal relationships.

    “DPSIR model, proposed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in 1993, is a system analysis tool based on causal relationships [38].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [38] Zhao, R., Fang, C., Liu, H., and Liu, X. (2021). Evaluating Urban Ecosystem Resilience Using the DPSIR Framework and the ENA Model: A Case Study of 35 Cities in China. Sustain. Cities Soc., 72. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    MLER is classified into 5 levels based on references [45].

    “Based on the references [45], MLER is classified into 5 levels, with the specific grading standards as follows:”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [45] Hu, 2025, Evaluating the Performance of Nature-Based Solutions in Urban regeneration: A Case Study of the Shibalidian Area, Chaoyang District, Beijing, City Plan. Rev.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Xun Wu exhibits shortcomings in the scientific rigor and sustainability of its restoration efforts, with inadequate focus on critical links such as soil remediation depth and stable vegetation community reconstruction.

    “Conversely, Xun Wu exhibits shortcomings in the scientific rigor and sustainability of its restoration efforts, with inadequate focus on critical links such as soil remediation depth and stable vegetation community reconstruction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisereasoning

    Jiangxi Province is highly representative in national mining ecological restoration.

    “Its mine land ecological restoration practices face common industry-wide challenges while also accumulating differentiated governance experience, making it highly representative in the field of national mining ecological restoration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The results are fundamentally consistent with the AHP-Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation method, verifying the robustness and reliability of the model.

    “These results are fundamentally consistent with the AHP-Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation method, verifying the robustness and reliability of the model.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The AHP-Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation method is a valid benchmark for verifying the robustness and reliability of the Vague sets model.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The game theory-based combined weighting method demonstrates superior scientific validity and applicability, providing a more reliable weight allocation methodology for the evaluation of mine land ecological resilience.

    “It demonstrates superior scientific validity and applicability, providing a more reliable weight allocation methodology for the evaluation of mine land ecological resilience.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The final weight distribution is more balanced and robust, avoiding the partiality of subjective experience while overcoming the dependency on fluctuations in objective data.

    “The final weight distribution is more balanced and robust, avoiding the partiality of subjective experience while overcoming the dependency on fluctuations in objective data.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Since the model is built on static data, it can complete fundamental evaluations but struggles to accurately depict temporal ecological processes and non-linear response mechanisms.

    “In terms of characterizing dynamic processes and non-linear relationships, since the model is built on static data, it can complete fundamental evaluations but struggles to accurately depict temporal ecological processes and non-linear response mechanisms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Xun Wu's low I and II intervals indicate impaired core ecological functions and insufficient integration of NbS principles.

    “In contrast, the Xun Wu mining area ranks highest in the”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In Gan Xian, Xing Guo, and Yu Du, mine ecological restoration has received sufficient investment in fundamental ecological elements like soil and vegetation and has prioritized long-term maintenance post-restoration.

    “In Gan Xian, Xing Guo, and Yu Du, mine ecological restoration has not only received sufficient investment in fundamental ecological elements like soil and vegetation but has also prioritized long-term maintenance post-restoration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    When handling indicators that include both quantitative monitoring and qualitative judgment, the Vague sets method can balance the objectivity of the data with the fuzziness of the judgments, overcoming the subjective bias introduced by linear weighting and manually set membership functions in the AHP-Fuzzy comprehensive.

    “When handling indicators that include both quantitative monitoring and qualitative judgment, it can balance the objectivity of the data with the fuzziness of the judgments, overcoming the subjective bias introduced by linear weighting and manually set membership functions in the AHP-Fuzzy comprehensive.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The combined weighting provides a more reliable quantitative foundation for scientific assessment and decision-making.

    “This provides a more reliable quantitative foundation for scientific assessment and decision-making.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    This distribution avoids the over-prominence of indicators like D4 (0.068) and I3 (0.061) seen in the multiplicative method, while also preventing the excessive weakening of indicators like R4 (0.024) and D2 (0.036).

    “This distribution avoids the”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The four selected mining areas are typical and suitable for empirical case study.

    “the research team, considering the spatial layout of green mine construction in Jiangxi Province, the distribution characteristics of mineral types, and key ecological restoration areas, purposefully selected typical mining areas in Gan Xian, Xing Guo, Yu Du, and Xun Wu as empirical case study sites”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The combined weighting approach achieves a balance between subjective and objective weights through game theory, while the Vague sets effectively accommodate fuzzy information and data gaps within the evaluation process.

    “The combined weighting approach achieves a balance between subjective and objective weights through game theory, while the Vague sets effectively accommodate fuzzy information and data gaps within the evaluation process.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The validation samples are concentrated in non-ferrous metal mining areas in the humid regions of Southern China, meaning the model's universality for coal mines in northern arid regions and salt lake mines on high-altitude plateaus requires further improvement.

    “Second, the validation samples are concentrated in non-ferrous metal mining areas in the humid regions of Southern China, meaning the model's universality for coal mines in northern arid regions and salt lake mines on high-altitude plateaus requires further improvement.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
50 of 50
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The AHP-Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation method is a valid benchmark for verifying the robustness and reliability of the Vague sets model.

    “These results are fundamentally consistent with the AHP-Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation method, verifying the robustness and reliability of the model.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The four selected mining areas (Xing Guo, Gan Xian, Yu Du, Xun Wu) are comparable and representative for evaluating differences in MLER.

    “The evaluation grades of MLER in the four selected study areas exhibit distinct differentiation, as shown in Figure 10.”
2 of 2

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Impact is not one of the two highest-weighted dimensions

    Minor

    The reported AHP weights put Impact (0.183) below both Response (0.204) and Pressure (0.199), not notably above the other three dimensions.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Junxia, 2025, Ecological benefit evaluation of limestone gravel mine ecologic virescence project based on concept of Nature-based Solutions, Agric. Eng., 15, 123
  2. Hu, 2024, An Effective Distance Measurement Formula Based on FuzzySet Theory, J. Hefei Univ. (Compr. Ed.), 41, 22
  3. Zhang, 2017, Comprehensive evaluation of high-speed railway station operation safetybased on IEM-Vague sets theory, China Saf. Sci. J., 27, 164
  4. Shan, 2016, Research on Emergency Rescue Capability of Coal Mine Based on Vague Set Theory, Coal Technol., 35, 320
  5. Yi, 2013, Method Improvement of Construction Project Risk EvaluationBased on ANP and Vague Sets Theory, J. East China Jiaotong Univ., 30, 9
  6. Yongjun, 2019, Resilience mechanism of land ecosystem in mining area based on nonlinear dynamic model, Mtxb, 44, 3174
  7. Jia, 2024, Ecological restoration of mines based on Nature-based Solution: A review, Coal Sci. Technol., 52, 209
  8. Wang, 2012, Mining method optimization of transition from open pitto underground mining based on AHP-TOPSIS, J. Guangxi Univ. Nat. Sci. Ed., 37, 1273
  9. Ke, 2020, Mine Safety Production Status Evaluation Based on Combination Weight and Matter Element Analysis, Gold Sci. Technol., 28, 910
  10. Wen, 2023, Application of Spatial Analytical Methods to Nature-based Solutions: Review of Research Progress, South Archit., 6, 86
  11. Hu, 2025, Evaluating the Performance of Nature-Based Solutions in Urban regeneration: A Case Study of the Shibalidian Area, Chaoyang District, Beijing, City Plan. Rev., 49, 97
  12. Ganzhou Government (2024). Ganzhou Statistical Yearbook 2024, China Statistics Press.
  13. Ma, 2024, Traps and improvements of PSR model: An eco-environmental perspective, Acta Ecol. Sin., 44, 4923

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feng, L., Xie, J., & Ke, Y.
Affiliations
  • Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Safe and Efficient Mining of Rare Metal Resources, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China
  • Jiangxi University of Science and Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Ke, Yuxian
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-12-23
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
164
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7116944117
Cited by
1
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Geology and Environmental Impact Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental Quality and Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Research studies in Vietnam
Keywords
nature-based solutions, vague sets, DPSIR framework, combination weighting, mine land restoration, sustainable mining

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-26.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-26.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review