The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Minimizing the multi-decadal cost of islanded renewable-electricity microgrids for different climate zones
Abstract
Abstract The aim of this study is to minimize the cost of developing a renewable energy islanded microgrid that provides reliable electricity and thermal comfort for a small building over multiple decades. The study is carried out with a model that minimizes the total cost of energy system components. Four different system configurations considering solar photovoltaics, electric heat pumps for heating and cooling, and a subset of battery-electricity storage, hydrogen-fuel-cell-electricity storage, and thermal-energy storage with phase-change materials are modeled. The objective is to minimize total lifecycle costs (capacity and operational costs) while ensuring reliable electricity as well as heat and cold supply. Over five climate zones, four system configurations, and 25 weather years, the annual costs of 100% renewable microgrids for residential-type loads and structures are at least 67% lower than the same microgrid powered with diesel generators for 75% of the cases. On average, using renewable energy instead of diesel reduces the annual cost of islanded microgrids by 72%. Systems with higher technology diversity, such as batteries combined with hydrogen-fuel-cell-electricity storage, result in even lower average-cost solutions (75% lower than diesel); however, they may increase the risk of loss of load events over the project lifetime if the systems are optimized for only one weather year. Despite the higher risk, the incremental cost to reduce one kWh loss of load over multiple weather years is estimated to be 89% lower with both batteries and hydrogen than with batteries alone, highlighting the value of diverse technology portfolios in microgrid planning. • Renewable microgrids cut annualized costs by ≥67% in 75% of tested base cases • Thermal storage cuts costs by 78% in cold climates compared to battery-only systems • In California, PV-battery-hydrogen systems reduce costs by 23% over battery-only • Battery-hydrogen setups lower loss of load more cheaply than battery-only systems • Robust sizing across weather years avoids overfitting and enhances reliability
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
World map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated
Kottek, M., Grieser, J., Beck, C., Rudolf, B., & Rubel, F. (2006) · Meteorologische Zeitschrift · doi:10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130 · Cited by 11,456
Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries
Richardson, K., Steffen, W., Lucht, W., Bendtsen, J., Cornell, S. E., Donges, J. F., Drüke, M., Fetzer, I., Bala, G., von Bloh, W., et al. (2023) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adh2458 · Cited by 3,311 · cited 1×
“The transition to renewable energy will not only address climate change, but will also ensure a secure energy future [5].”
Climate Change 2022 - Mitigation of Climate Change
Creutzig, F., Roy, J., Devine‐Wright, P., Diaz-Jose, J., Geels, F. W., Grubler, A., Mäızi, N., Masanet, E., Mulugetta, Y., Onyige-Ebeniro, C. D., et al. (2023) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009157926 · Cited by 2,648
Quantifying the influence of global warming on unprecedented extreme climate events
Diffenbaugh, N. S., Singh, D., Mankin, J., Horton, D. E., Swain, D. L., Touma, D., Charland, A., Liu, Y., Haugen, M. A., Tsiang, M., et al. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1618082114 · Cited by 816
On the History and Future of 100% Renewable Energy Systems Research
Breyer, C., Khalili, S., Bogdanov, D., Ram, M., Oyewo, A. S., Aghahosseini, A., Gulagi, A., Solomon, A. A., Keiner, D., Lopez, G., et al. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3193402 · Cited by 645
Self-citationThe global costs of extreme weather that are attributable to climate change
Newman, R., & Noy, I. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-41888-1 · Cited by 575
Latent thermal energy storage technologies and applications: A review
Jouhara, H., Żabnieńska-Góra, A., Khordehgah, N., Ahmad, D., & Lipinski, T. (2020) · International Journal of Thermofluids · doi:10.1016/j.ijft.2020.100039 · Cited by 543 · cited 1×
“This mode of heat and cold storage has higher volumetric and gravimetric energy density [28], which can be critical in remote and mobile microgrid applications.”
Global potential of green ammonia based on hybrid PV-wind power plants
Fasihi, M., Weiss, R. F., Savolainen, J., & Breyer, C. (2021) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116170 · Cited by 496
Microgrids: A review, outstanding issues and future trends
Uddin, M., Mo, H., Dong, D., Elsawah, S., Zhu, J., & Guerrero, J. M. (2023) · Energy Strategy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.esr.2023.101127 · Cited by 455
Anoune, K., Bouya, M., Astito, A., & Abdellah, A. B. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.032 · Cited by 382
Metadata
- Authors
- Mühlbauer, A., Fan, Y. F., Sambor, D. J., & Jacobson, M. Z.
- Venue
- Smart Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025-11
- Volume
- 20
- Pages
- 100208
- ISSN
- 2666-9552
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 37
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (vor)
- Funders
- Engineer Research and Development Center (W9132T2220006)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Minimizing the multi-decadal cost of islanded renewable-electricity microgrids for different climate zones. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.segy.2025.100208
- The paper
- Mühlbauer, A., Fan, Y. F., Sambor, D. J., & Jacobson, M. Z. (2025). Minimizing the multi-decadal cost of islanded renewable-electricity microgrids for different climate zones. Smart Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.segy.2025.100208
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.