Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 7

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Minimizing the multi-decadal cost of islanded renewable-electricity microgrids for different climate zones

Mühlbauer, Andreas, Fan, Yuanbei F., Sambor, Daniel J., Jacobson, Mark Z.·2025·Smart Energy

Abstract

Abstract The aim of this study is to minimize the cost of developing a renewable energy islanded microgrid that provides reliable electricity and thermal comfort for a small building over multiple decades. The study is carried out with a model that minimizes the total cost of energy system components. Four different system configurations considering solar photovoltaics, electric heat pumps for heating and cooling, and a subset of battery-electricity storage, hydrogen-fuel-cell-electricity storage, and thermal-energy storage with phase-change materials are modeled. The objective is to minimize total lifecycle costs (capacity and operational costs) while ensuring reliable electricity as well as heat and cold supply. Over five climate zones, four system configurations, and 25 weather years, the annual costs of 100% renewable microgrids for residential-type loads and structures are at least 67% lower than the same microgrid powered with diesel generators for 75% of the cases. On average, using renewable energy instead of diesel reduces the annual cost of islanded microgrids by 72%. Systems with higher technology diversity, such as batteries combined with hydrogen-fuel-cell-electricity storage, result in even lower average-cost solutions (75% lower than diesel); however, they may increase the risk of loss of load events over the project lifetime if the systems are optimized for only one weather year. Despite the higher risk, the incremental cost to reduce one kWh loss of load over multiple weather years is estimated to be 89% lower with both batteries and hydrogen than with batteries alone, highlighting the value of diverse technology portfolios in microgrid planning. • Renewable microgrids cut annualized costs by ≥67% in 75% of tested base cases • Thermal storage cuts costs by 78% in cold climates compared to battery-only systems • In California, PV-battery-hydrogen systems reduce costs by 23% over battery-only • Battery-hydrogen setups lower loss of load more cheaply than battery-only systems • Robust sizing across weather years avoids overfitting and enhances reliability

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.segy.2025.100208

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Metadata

Authors
Mühlbauer, A., Fan, Y. F., Sambor, D. J., & Jacobson, M. Z.
Venue
Smart Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-11
Volume
20
Pages
100208
ISSN
2666-9552
Cited by
7
References
37
Language
en
Licence
Funders
Engineer Research and Development Center (W9132T2220006)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Minimizing the multi-decadal cost of islanded renewable-electricity microgrids for different climate zones. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.segy.2025.100208
The paper
Mühlbauer, A., Fan, Y. F., Sambor, D. J., & Jacobson, M. Z. (2025). Minimizing the multi-decadal cost of islanded renewable-electricity microgrids for different climate zones. Smart Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.segy.2025.100208

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.