Cited by 575Climate variability and modelsClimate Change Policy and EconomicsClimate Change and Environmental Impact

The global costs of extreme weather that are attributable to climate change

Open access
Newman, Rebecca, Noy, Ilan·2023·Nature Communications

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Extreme weather events lead to significant adverse societal costs. Extreme Event Attribution (EEA), a methodology that examines how anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions had changed the occurrence of specific extreme weather events, allows us to quantify the climate change-induced component of these costs. We collect data from all available EEA studies, combine these with data on the socio-economic costs of these events and extrapolate for missing data to arrive at an estimate of the global costs of extreme weather attributable to climate change in the last twenty years. We find that US $$\$$$ $ 143 billion per year of the costs of extreme events is attributable to climatic change. The majority (63%), of this is due to human loss of life. Our results suggest that the frequently cited estimates of the economic costs of climate change arrived at by using Integrated Assessment Models may be substantially underestimated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-023-41888-1

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. [3]Allen M Liability for climate change Nature 2003 421 891 892 10.1038/421891a 12606972 · DOI
  2. [5]Risser MD Paciorek CJ Stone DA Spatially dependent multiple testing under model misspecification, with application to detection of anthropogenic influence on extreme climate events J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 2019 114 61 78 10.1080/01621459.2018.1451335 · DOI
  3. [7]Frame D Wehner M Noy I Rosier S The economic costs of Hurricane Harvey attributable to climate change Clim. Change 2020 160 271 281 10.1007/s10584-020-02692-8 · DOI
  4. [8]Smiley K Social inequalities in climate change-attributed impacts of Hurricane Harvey Nat. Commun. 2022 13 3418 10.1038/s41467-022-31056-2 36008390 PMC9411551 · DOI
  5. [9]Noy I A global comprehensive measure of the impact of natural hazards and disasters Glob. Policy 2016 7 56 65 10.1111/1758-5899.12272 · DOI
  6. [11]Nordhaus W. & Boyer J. Roll the DICE Again: Economic Models of Global Warming (MIT Press, 1999).
  7. [12]Nordhaus W Revisiting the social cost of carbon Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017 114 1518 1523 10.1073/pnas.1609244114 28143934 PMC5321009 · DOI
  8. [19]Clarke B E L Otto F Jones R Inventories of extreme weather events and impacts: Implications for loss and damage from and adaptation to climate extremes Clim. Risk Manag. 2021 32 100285 10.1016/j.crm.2021.100285 · DOI
  9. [20]Frame D Climate change attribution and the economic costs of extreme weather events: a study on damages from extreme rainfall and drought Clim. Change 2020 162 781 797 10.1007/s10584-020-02729-y · DOI
  10. [24]National Academies of Sciences. Attribution of Extreme Weather Events in the Context of Climate Change (The National Academies Press, 2016).
  11. [25]Stone DA Rosier SM Frame DJ The question of life, the universe and event attribution Nat. Clim. Change 2021 11 276 278 10.1038/s41558-021-01012-x · DOI
  12. [26]Dole R Was there a basis for anticipating the 2010 Russian heat wave? Geophys. Res. Lett. 2011 38 L06702 10.1029/2010GL046582 · DOI
  13. [27]Rahmstorf S Coumou D Increase of extreme events in a warming world Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011 108 17905 17909 10.1073/pnas.1101766108 22025683 PMC3207670 · DOI
  14. [28]Hannart A Pearl J Otto F Naveau P Ghil M Causal counterfactual theory for the attribution of weather and climate-related events Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2016 97 99 110 10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00034.1 · DOI
  15. [29]Stone DA The effect of experiment conditioning on estimates of human influence on extreme weather Weather Clim. Extremes 2022 36 100427 10.1016/j.wace.2022.100427 · DOI
  16. [30]Angélil O On the nonlinearity of spatial scales in extreme weather attribution statements Clim. Dyn. 2018 50 2739 2752 10.1007/s00382-017-3768-9 · DOI
  17. [31]Uhe P Comparison of methods: attributing the 2014 record European temperatures to human influences Geophys. Res. Lett. 2016 43 8685 8693 10.1002/2016GL069568 · DOI
  18. [32]Perkins-Kirkpatrick S On the attribution of the impacts of extreme weather events to anthropogenic climate change Environ. Res. Lett. 2022 17 024009 10.1088/1748-9326/ac44c8 · DOI
  19. [33]Orlov A Global economic responses to heat stress impacts on worker productivity in crop production Econ. Disasters Clim. Change 2021 5 367 390 10.1007/s41885-021-00091-6 · DOI
  20. [35]Pascal M Evolving heat waves characteristics challenge heat warning systems and prevention plans Int. J. Biometeorol. 2021 65 1683 1694 10.1007/s00484-021-02123-y 33811538 PMC8019079 · DOI
  21. [36]Stuart-Smith RF Filling the evidentiary gap in climate litigation Nat. Clim. Change 2021 11 651 655 10.1038/s41558-021-01086-7 · DOI
  22. [37]Lott FC Quantifying the contribution of an individual to making extreme weather events more likely Environ. Res. Lett. 2021 16 104040 10.1088/1748-9326/abe9e9 · DOI
  23. [39]Mitchell D Attributing human mortality during extreme heat waves to anthropogenic climate change Environ. Res. Lett. 2016 11 074006 10.1088/1748-9326/11/7/074006 · DOI · Paper page
  24. [41]Puvvula J Estimating the burden of heat-related illness morbidity attributable to anthropogenic climate change in North Carolina GeoHealth 2022 6 e2022GH000636 10.1029/2022GH000636 36439028 PMC9685474 · DOI
  25. [42]Anthoff D Tol RJ The uncertainty about the social cost of carbon: a decomposition analysis using fund Clim. Change 2013 117 515 530 10.1007/s10584-013-0706-7 · DOI
  26. [43]Diaz D Moore F Quantifying the economic risks of climate change Nat. Clim. Change 2017 7 774 782 10.1038/nclimate3411 · DOI
  27. [44]Goodess C Hanson C Hulme M Osborn T Representing climate and extreme weather events in integrated assessment models: a review of existing methods and options for development Integr. Assess. 2003 4 145 171 10.1076/iaij.4.3.145.23772 · DOI
  28. [45]Bouwer L Have disaster losses increased due to anthropogenic climate change? Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2011 92 39 46 10.1175/2010BAMS3092.1 · DOI
  29. [46]Tol R The marginal damage costs of carbon dioxide emissions: an assessment of the uncertainties Energy Policy 2005 33 2064 2074 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.04.002 · DOI
  30. [47]van den Bergh J Safe climate policy is affordable—12 reasons Clim. Change 2009 101 339 385 10.1007/s10584-009-9719-7 · DOI
  31. [48]Stott, P. et al. Attribution of weather and climate-related events. In Climate Science for Serving Society: Research, Modelling and Prediction Priorities. (eds Asrar, G. R. & Hurrell, J. W.) 307–337 (Springer, 2013).
  32. [49]Jézéquel A Behind the veil of extreme event attribution Clim. Change 2018 149 367 383 10.1007/s10584-018-2252-9 · DOI
  33. [50]Hammitt J Valuing mortality risk: theory and practice Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000 34 1396 1400 10.1021/es990733n · DOI
  34. [51]Kniesner, T. & Viscusi, W. The value of a statistical life. SSRN10.2139/ssrn.3379967 (2019).
  35. [54]Scimago Research Group. Description of Scimago Journal Rank Indicator. Retrieved from https://www.scimagojr.com/SCImagoJournalRank.pdf (2007).
  36. [55]Viscusi W Best estimate selection bias in the value of a statistical life J. Benefit-Cost. Anal. 2018 9 205 246 10.1017/bca.2017.21 · DOI
  37. [56]Zhang W Influences of natural variability and anthropogenic forcing on the extreme 2015 accumulated cyclone energy in the western North Pacific Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2016 97 S131 S135 10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0146.1 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Newman, R., & Noy, I.
Affiliations
  • Reserve Bank of New Zealand (NZ)
  • Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
Corresponding author
Noy, Ilan
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2023-09-29
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
6103-6103
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387167601
Cited by
575
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 201 · 2025: 239 · 2024: 128 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1
FWCI
64.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ministry for Business Innovation and Employment (Endeavour Whakahura)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Environmental Impact
Keywords
extreme weather events, climate change attribution, socioeconomic costs, economic costs of climate change, extreme event attribution, greenhouse gas emissions, human mortality, integrated assessment models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review