Cited by 51Epilepsy research and treatmentEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesSleep and related disorders

The value of home video with ambulatory EEG: a prospective service review

Open access
Goodwin, Emma, Kandler, Rosalind H., Alix, James J.P.·2014·Seizure

Abstract

Purpose The demand for long term EEG monitoring is increasing with the emphasis on recording patients' attacks. Outpatient ambulatory EEG is relatively inexpensive and widely available. The main disadvantage of the technique is the lack of video which can make interpretation of an ictus difficult. We investigated whether patients, if offered home video equipment, would take it, if this resulted in simultaneous EEG-video capture of an ictus and if interpretation of the recording was facilitated by the video.Method All ambulatory EEG patients, adults and children, were offered a camcorder to take home during a 17-month study period.Results 130 patients/carers were offered a camcorder (93 adults, 37 children), 45 patients (35%) accepted; the main reason for not accepting was that attacks were considered too brief to record. An ictal event occurred in 34 patients (76%) with a camcorder; in 17 (50%) of these an attack was captured successfully on video. The main reasons for failure to capture events were that attacks were too brief, or that the camcorder was not operated successfully. Attacks were captured with greater success in children (14/23, 61%) than adults (3/11, 27%). Of the 17 video recordings, 14 (82%) were helpful in aiding interpretation of the ambulatory EEG.Conclusion In our study, home video facilities aided interpretation of ambulatory EEG recordings in approximately one third of patients. Technological advances and familiarity with portable recording devices will improve this figure and patients and their carers should be encouraged to use such facilities when available.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.seizure.2014.02.008

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In epilepsy, advances are made towards prolonged video and EEG recording in patients' homes.

    “In epilepsy, advances are made towards prolonged video and EEG recording in patients' homes. 206,207”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goodwin, E., Kandler, R. H., & Alix, J. J. P.
Affiliations
Royal Hallamshire Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Goodwin, Emma
  • Kandler, Rosalind H.
  • Alix, James J.P.
Venue
Seizure
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-06
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
480-482
ISSN
1059-1311 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047039601
Cited by
51
References
5
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Seizure (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
ambulatory EEG, home video recording, camcorders, long-term EEG monitoring, pediatric epilepsy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Ambulatory Care, Brain, Child, Child, Preschool, Electroencephalography, Epilepsy, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Self Care, Time Factors, Video Recording, Caregivers, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review