Cited by 315Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and Treatment

Structural and functional brain abnormalities in chronic low back pain: a systematic review

Kregel, Jeroen, Meeus, Mira, Malfliet, Anneleen, Dolphens, Mieke, Danneels, Lieven, Nijs, Jo, Cagnie, Barbara·2015·Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism

Abstract

Objectives The purpose of this systematic review is to analyze the available literature on structural and functional brain abnormalities in chronic low back pain (CLBP) using several brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques.Methods PubMed and Web of Science were systematically screened for relevant literature using different combinations of keywords regarding structural and functional brain imaging techniques in patients with CLBP. Reference lists of included articles were hand-searched for additional literature. Eligible articles were assessed on risk of bias and reviewed by two independent researchers.Results The search query returned 27 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. Methodological quality varied from poor to good. A total of 10 studies evaluated structural gray matter changes. There is conflicting evidence in global gray matter changes, with both increases and decreases shown in different studies. Gray matter changes were demonstrated in specific brain regions. Structural white matter changes were reported in five studies. There is conflicting evidence in total white matter volume due to both increases and unchanged white matter. Several regional differences were identified in which white matter changes were shown. Functional organization during rest was evaluated in 10 studies. CLBP patients showed increased activation in specific regions, together with a disrupted default mode network. A total of six studies evaluated brain activity in response to a nociceptive stimulus. Findings suggest that patients demonstrated increased activity in pain-related regions, and decreased activity in analgesic regions.Conclusions Overall, there is moderate evidence for regional changes in gray and white matter, together with an altered functional connectivity during rest and increased activity in pain-related areas following painful stimulation, evidencing an upregulated pain matrix. More longitudinal research is needed to clarify the temporal relationship regarding pain and neuroplastic changes, and integration of different brain imaging techniques is warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2015.05.002

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Catastrophizing mediates sex differences in pain-related outcomes, clinical pain, and experimental pain.

    “catastrophizing has been shown to mediate the sex differences in pain-related outcomes, clinical pain, and experimental pain 162, 205, 206.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 58 · Cited by 315

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [34]34. Giesecke T, Gracely RH, Clauw DJ, Nachemson A, Duck MH, Sabatowski R, et al. [Central pain processing in chronic low back pain. Evidence for reduced pain inhibition]. Schmerz 2006;20(5):411-4, 416-7.

Authors
Kregel, J., Meeus, M., Malfliet, A., Dolphens, M., Danneels, L., Nijs, J., & Cagnie, B.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
  • Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
Cagnie, Barbara
Venue
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
45
Issue
2
Pages
229-237
ISSN
0049-0172 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1531443818
Cited by
315
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
chronic low back pain, brain abnormalities, gray matter changes, white matter changes, default mode network, functional connectivity, pain matrix, nociceptive stimulation, neuroplasticity, neuroimaging
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Low Back Pain, Chronic Pain, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review