Update of the permanent clinical impairment adjudication guide for occupational mental diseases in France
Open accessAbstract
capacity.Rehabilitation measures with a comprehensive solution of issues of treatment, employment, motivation allows to prevent the progression of the OD and contributes to improving the quality of life of patients.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In France, proposed guidelines have suggested recoding burnout to other diagnoses (such as depression, F32) if appropriate, for compensation purposes, as burnout is not considered as a disease.
“In France, proposed guidelines have suggested to consider recoding of burnout to other diagnoses (such as depression, F32) if appropriate, for compensation purposes [5], as burnout is not considered as a disease [36].”
From Mindfulness-based Practices in Workers to Address Mental Health Conditions: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [5]
The proposal’s Abstract (no page given in our copy) describes diagnosis-based rules for assessing permanent clinical impairment and compensation in France. It does not say that the guidelines recommend recoding burnout as depression (F32) or another diagnosis. Searches for burnout recoding and F32 found no passage addressing that recommendation; the separate assertion that burnout is not a disease is attached to citation [36], not this source. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mindfulness-based Practices in Workers to Address Mental Health Conditions: A Systematic Review
Durand-Moreau, Q., Jackson, T., Deibert, D., Els, C., Kung, J. Y., & Straube, S. (2023) · Safety and Health at Work · doi:10.1016/j.shaw.2023.07.006
“In France, proposed guidelines have suggested to consider recoding of burnout to other diagnoses (such as depression, F32) if appropriate, for compensation purposes [5], as burnout is not considered as a disease [36].”
BackgroundSelf-citation
- Authors
- Durand-Moreau, Q., Baro, P., Jay, F., Lebon, A., Vassilief, L., & Lasfargues, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble (FR)
- Mutualité Sociale Agricole (FR)
- l'Assurance Maladie (FR)
- Université Paris-Est Créteil (FR)
- Venue
- Safety and Health at Work
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-01
- Volume
- 13
- Pages
- S294
- ISSN
- 2093-7911 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4210719157
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Safety and Health at Work (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
- Keywords
- occupational mental disorders, disability assessment, work disability, rehabilitation, return to work, quality of life
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
