Cited by 46Philosophy and History of SciencePhilosophy, Science, and HistoryDiverse Historical and Scientific Studies

Trade-offs in model-building: A more target-oriented approach

Matthewson, John·2011·Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.11.040

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matthewson, J.
Affiliations
Australian National University (AU)
Corresponding author
Matthewson, John
Venue
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-06
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
324-333
ISSN
0039-3681 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054878211
Cited by
46
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
8.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy, Science, and History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies
Keywords
Richard Levins, model development, population biology, scientific models, generalization, philosophy of biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review