Cited by 110Speech and Audio ProcessingDirection-of-Arrival Estimation TechniquesMusic and Audio Processing

Time difference of arrival estimation of speech source in a noisy and reverberant environment

Dvorkind, Tsvi G., Gannot, Sharon·2005·Signal Processing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sigpro.2004.09.014

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dvorkind, T. G., & Gannot, S.
Affiliations
  • Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
  • Bar-Ilan University (IL)
Corresponding author
Dvorkind, Tsvi G.
Venue
Signal Processing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-01
Volume
85
Issue
1
Pages
177-204
ISSN
0165-1684 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016637789
Cited by
110
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Direction-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
Keywords
time difference of arrival estimation, speech localization, microphone array, reverberation, noise, frequency domain analysis, speaker tracking, videoconferencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review