Cited by 44Indoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesOptical Wireless Communication TechnologiesHuman Mobility and Location-Based Analysis

A Fingerprint Technique for Indoor Localization Using Autoencoder Based Semi-Supervised Deep Extreme Learning Machine

Open access
Ezzati Khatab, Zahra, Hajihoseini Gazestani, Amirhosein, Ghorashi, Seyed Ali, Ghavami, Mohammad·2021·Signal Processing

Abstract

In recent years, because of the growing demand for location based services in indoor environment and development of Wi-Fi, fingerprint-based indoor localization has attracted many researchers’ interest. In Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs), fingerprint based localization methods estimate the target location by using a pattern matching model for the measurements of the Received Signal Strength (RSS) from the available transmitter sensors, which are collected by a smartphone with internal sensors. Due to the dynamic nature of the environment, the fingerprint database needs to be updated, periodically. Hence, it is better to add new fingerprint data to the primary database in order to update them. However, collecting the labeled data is time consuming and labor intensive. In this paper, we propose a novel algorithm, which uses high level extracted features by an autoencoder to improve the localization performance in the classification process. Furthermore, to update the fingerprint data base, we also add crowd-sourced labeled and unlabeled data in order to improve the localization performance, gradually. Simulation results indicate that the proposed method provides a significant improvement in localization performance, using high level extracted features by the autoencoder, and by increasing the number of unlabeled training data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sigpro.2020.107915

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Context-aware and semi-supervised calibration methods have been developed to adapt BLE ranging models to changing playground environments and to improve accuracy even when labeled training data are limited.

    “Furthermore, context-aware and semi-supervised calibration methods have been developed to adapt BLE ranging models to changing playground environments and to improve accuracy even when labeled training data are limited [22,23].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ezzati Khatab, Z., Hajihoseini Gazestani, A., Ghorashi, S. A., & Ghavami, M.
Affiliations
  • University of East London (GB)
  • London South Bank University (GB)
Corresponding author
Ghorashi, Seyed Ali
Venue
Signal Processing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
181
Pages
107915
ISSN
0165-1684 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3106644101
Cited by
44
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 5
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
  • Research Open (London South Bank University) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optical Wireless Communication Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
Keywords
indoor positioning, location fingerprinting, autoencoder, semi-supervised learning, extreme learning machine, crowdsourced data, feature extraction, location-based services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review