Cited by 123Building Energy and Comfort OptimizationAdvanced Multi-Objective Optimization AlgorithmsSimulation Techniques and Applications

Comparative study of metamodelling techniques in building energy simulation: Guidelines for practitioners

Open access
Van Gelder, Liesje, Das, Payel, Janssen, Hans, Roels, Staf·2014·Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.simpat.2014.10.004

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ML has the potential to greatly speed up building energy demand computations by ignoring physical knowledge, incorporating it, or learning surrogate models.

    “ML has the potential to speed up these computations greatly, either by ignoring physical knowledge of the building entirely [452,617], by incorporating it into the computation [195], or by learning to approximate the physical model to reduce the need for expensive simulation (surrogate models) [274].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [274]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. J. P. Kleijnen, R. G. Sargent, A methodology for fitting and validating metamodels in simulation, European Journal Of Operational Research 120 (2000) 14-29.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Gelder, L., Das, P., Janssen, H., & Roels, S.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Venue
Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-12
Volume
49
Pages
245-257
ISSN
1569-190X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002322798
Cited by
123
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7
FWCI
7.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Simulation Techniques and Applications
Keywords
metamodeling, surrogate models, building energy simulation, kriging, multivariate adaptive regression splines, polynomial regression, radial basis function neural network, artificial neural networks, computational complexity reduction, model selection, design optimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review