Cited by 154Sleep and related disordersPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesObstructive Sleep Apnea Research

Long-term use of sedative hypnotics in older patients with insomnia

Ancoli-Israel, Sonia, Richardson, Gary S., Mangano, Richard M., Jenkins, Lisa, Hall, Phil, Jones, Walter S.·2005·Sleep Medicine

Abstract

Background and purpose Insomnia is a common problem that increases with age and can last months to years. While substantial data establish the efficacy and safety of short-acting hypnotic therapy for the management of short-term insomnia using benzodiazepines receptor agonists (BzRAs), there are few studies on the continued efficacy and safety of these drugs when used for sustained periods. This paper reports the results of a 1-year open-label extension phases of two randomized, double-blind trials of zaleplon. Patients and methods In the open-label phase, older patients self-administered zaleplon nightly from 6 to 12 months and were then followed through a 7-day single-blind placebo-controlled run-out period. Results The safety profile in this population of older adults was similar to that observed in a short-term trial of an equivalent population. The data also suggested that long-term therapy produced and maintained statistically significant improvement in time to persistent sleep onset, duration of sleep and number of nocturnal awakenings (P Conclusion The open-label trial of long-term hypnotic therapy with zaleplon 5 and 10 mg suggests that they are safe and effective for the treatment of insomnia in older patients. Placebo-controlled, double-blind trials are needed in zaleplon and other BzRAs to confirm these results.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sleep.2004.10.015

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In clinical practice, hypnotic medications are often used over durations of one to twelve months without dosage escalation.

    “In clinical practice, hypnotic medications are often used over durations of one to twelve months without dosage escalation, 52-55”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ancoli-Israel, S., Richardson, G. S., Mangano, R. M., Jenkins, L., Hall, P., & Jones, W. S.
Affiliations
  • Henry Ford Hospital (US)
  • Wyeth (US)
Venue
Sleep Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-03
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
107-113
ISSN
1389-9457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062400672
Cited by
154
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 13
FWCI
13.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Keywords
insomnia, older adults, zaleplon, benzodiazepine receptor agonists, sleep latency, sleep duration, nocturnal awakenings, rebound insomnia, drug safety, open-label extension
MeSH terms
Zolpidem, Acetamides, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Pyridines, Pyrimidines, Receptors, GABA-A, Time, Wakefulness, Single-Blind Method

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review