Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 287

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Validation of a new REM sleep behavior disorder questionnaire (RBDQ-HK)

Open access
Li, S.X., Wing, Y.K., Lam, S.P., Zhang, J., Yu, M.W.M., Ho, C.K.W., Tsoh, J., Mok, V.·2010·Sleep Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVES There are limited screening instruments for diagnosis of REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) and none for quantifying the severity of disease. We aimed to validate a 13-item self-reported RBD questionnaire (RBDQ-HK) for diagnostic and monitoring purposes. METHODS Based on ICSD-II and our previous clinical and empirical work, the RBDQ-HK questionnaire was designed and administered in patients attending university-affiliated sleep clinic and psychiatric out-patient clinic, and subjects from the general population. ROC curve and exploratory factor analysis were employed to evaluate the scale, which had a score ranging from 0 to 100. RESULTS One hundred and seven RBD patients [mean age 62.6 (15.5) years; male 70.1%] and 107 control subjects [mean age 55.3 (9.0) years, male 57.9%] completed the questionnaire. The diagnoses of all the study subjects were independently ascertained by clinical interview and PSG. RBD patients had a significantly higher total RBDQ-HK score [mean (s.d.): 32.1 (16.1), range 3-71] than the control group [9.5 (10.2), range 0-55] (p<0.005). The RBDQ-HK demonstrated robust psychometric properties with moderate sensitivity (82.2%), specificity (86.9%), positive predictive value (PPV; 86.3%), and negative predictive value (NPV; 83.0%), high internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Exploratory factor analysis revealed two components (dream-related and behavioral factors) that corresponded to the essential clinical features of RBD. The best cut-off for total score (range 0-100) was at 18/19 and the best cut-off for factor 2 (behavioral factors including sleep talking, shouting, limb movements and sleep-related injuries, range 0-70) was at 7/8. CONCLUSIONS The RBDQ-HK has satisfactory validity and reliability as a measure of clinical RBD symptoms and severity. It may serve as an effective tool for diagnosis and evaluation of the disease course to facilitate future clinical and research studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sleep.2009.06.008

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 287

Metadata

Authors
Li, S. X., Wing, Y. K., Lam, S. P., Zhang, J., Yu, M. W. M., Ho, C. K. W., Tsoh, J., & Mok, V.
Venue
Sleep Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
43-48
ISSN
1389-9457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1997122959
Cited by
287
References
2
FWCI
8.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validation of a new REM sleep behavior disorder questionnaire (RBDQ-HK). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.sleep.2009.06.008
The paper
Li, S. X., Wing, Y. K., Lam, S. P., Zhang, J., Yu, M. W. M., Ho, C. K. W., Tsoh, J., & Mok, V. (2010). Validation of a new REM sleep behavior disorder questionnaire (RBDQ-HK). Sleep Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2009.06.008

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.