Association between sleep duration, weight gain, and obesity for long period
Abstract
Background Although previous studies showed the long-term effects of sleep duration on risk of weight gain, Western tends to gain weight irrespective of sleep duration over a long period. Conversely, it is showed that body mass index (BMI) decreases during a long period in Japanese and thus, the long-term effect of sleep duration on weight gain and obesity is still unclear in Asia.Methods We followed up 13,629 participants aged 40-79years and prospectively collected data from 1995 to 2006. We divided the participants into five groups according to their self-reported sleep duration: ⩽5h (short sleep), 6h, 7h (reference), 8h, and ⩾9h (long sleep). The main outcome was ⩾5kg weight gain or BMI⩾25kg/m(2) (obesity). We used logistic regression analyses to derive odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusted for several confounding factors.Results We observed no association between sleep duration and risk of ⩾5kg weight gain and obesity. After stratification by BMI, long sleepers had a significantly increased risk of ⩾5kg weight gain (OR: 1.36, 95%CI: 1.09-1.70) in obese participants.Conclusions Among community-dwelling Japanese, only obese long sleepers have a significantly increased long-term risk of ⩾5kg weight gain.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Short sleep duration is associated with obesity-related outcomes, including incident weight gain, incident obesity, current body mass index, and current adiposity.
“short sleep duration has been associated with obesity-related outcomes, diabetes-related outcomes, and cardiovascular-related outcomes. Regarding obesity-related outcomes, short sleep duration has been associated with incident weight gain (Kobayashi et al., 2012; Nagai et al., 2013), incident obesity (Watanabe et al., 2010), current body mass index (Patel, 2009), and current adiposity(Chaput et al”
From Addressing sleep disturbances: an opportunity to prevent cardiometabolic disease? (2014) · cites this paper as Nagai et al., 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 67
- Authors
- Nagai, M., Tomata, Y., Watanabe, T., Kakizaki, M., & Tsuji, I.
- Affiliations
- Tohoku University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Nagai, Masato
- Venue
- Sleep Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-02
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 206-210
- ISSN
- 1389-9457 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1993548744
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8
- FWCI
- 7.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
- Keywords
- sleep duration, weight gain, obesity, long sleep, short sleep duration, body mass index, Japanese adults, long-term weight change
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Female, Humans, Disorders of Excessive Somnolence, Japan, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Sleep Deprivation, Weight Gain, Confidence Intervals, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review