Cited by 2Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsSleep and related disordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Acceptance and commitment therapy for insomnia: a pilot study

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sleep.2019.11.1030

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rafihi-Ferreira, R., Neto, F. L., Morin, C., Toscanini, A., Borges, D. S., Brasil, I. S. P. D. S., Gallinaro, J. G., Conway, S. G., & Hasan, R.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • Université Laval (CA)
Venue
Sleep Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-12
Volume
64
Pages
S369-S370
ISSN
1389-9457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2995558530
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, insomnia, cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review