The effects of sleep on prospective memory: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Enhancing effects of sleep appeared particularly pronounced for prospective memories of plans in some cases, whereas other studies failed to demonstrate similar effects.
“enhancing effects of sleep appeared to be particularly pronounced for prospective memories of plans in some cases, 30,31 whereas other studies on salient prospective memory failed to demonstrate similar effects.”
From Sleep—A brain-state serving systems memory consolidation (2023) · cites this paper as [31]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 3
- Authors
- Leong, R. L. F., Cheng, G. H.-L., Chee, M. W. L., & Lo, J. C.
- Affiliations
- Duke-NUS Medical School (SG)
- Venue
- Sleep Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 64
- Pages
- S222-S223
- ISSN
- 1389-9457 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2996258980
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 0.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Keywords
- sleep, prospective memory, spontaneous retrieval, strategic monitoring, memory consolidation, sleep and memory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
