Cited by 343Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsNeural dynamics and brain function

Sleep—A brain-state serving systems memory consolidation

Open access
Brodt, Svenja, Inostroza, Marion, Niethard, Niels, Born, Jan·2023·Neuron

Abstract

Although long-term memory consolidation is supported by sleep, it is unclear how it differs from that during wakefulness. Our review, focusing on recent advances in the field, identifies the repeated replay of neuronal firing patterns as a basic mechanism triggering consolidation during sleep and wakefulness. During sleep, memory replay occurs during slow-wave sleep (SWS) in hippocampal assemblies together with ripples, thalamic spindles, neocortical slow oscillations, and noradrenergic activity. Here, hippocampal replay likely favors the transformation of hippocampus-dependent episodic memory into schema-like neocortical memory. REM sleep following SWS might balance local synaptic rescaling accompanying memory transformation with a sleep-dependent homeostatic process of global synaptic renormalization. Sleep-dependent memory transformation is intensified during early development despite the immaturity of the hippocampus. Overall, beyond its greater efficacy, sleep consolidation differs from wake consolidation mainly in that it is supported, rather than impaired, by spontaneous hippocampal replay activity possibly gating memory formation in neocortex.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2023.03.005

Cites

300 of 305 references verified0 citation errors · 5 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

279 of 438 cited sources checked · 102 supported · 12 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Findingcitation

    Spontaneous memory reactivations can be decoded from EEG during SO-spindle complexes after learning word-image pairs using multivariate classification.

    “Spontaneous memory reactivations can be decoded from the EEG signal during SO-spindle complexes after the participants had learned word-image pairs using multivariate classification 114 (Figure 3).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [114] 114. Khodagholy, D., Gelinas, J.N., and Buzsa ´ki, G. (2017). Learning- enhanced coupling between ripple oscillations in association cortices and hippocampus. Science 358, 369-372. 192. source

      The passages describing the methods and learning task state that this study recorded cortical and hippocampal activity in rats trained on a spatial cheeseboard maze, not EEG from participants learning word–image pairs. The reported result was stronger hippocampal–cortical ripple coupling during postlearning sleep; the source does not report decoding memory reactivations with multivariate classification. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingcitation

    Slow oscillatory activity shows an inverted U-shaped trajectory peaking during early adolescence.

    “Subsequently, slow oscillatory activity shows an inverted U-shaped trajectory peaking during early adolescence”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [253] source

      The Introduction (p. 3) says slow wave activity reaches its maximum during childhood and declines throughout adolescence, contrary to a peak in early adolescence. The Age groups section (p. 5) places the maximum in the 5–8.9-year age group. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingcitation

    Rat pups showed increases in spindle density in parallel with the emergence of hippocampal object-in-place memories during early development.

    “Rat pups showed increases in spindle density in parallel with the emergence of hippocampal object-in-place memories during early development.275”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [275] source

      The Results (Postnatal Hippocampal-Dependent Memory Onset; page unavailable) place the emergence of object-place recognition memory at P32. But the Discussion (page unavailable) explicitly reports no reliable developmental change in spindle density; it relates higher spindle density to better memory performance instead. That contradicts the claimed developmental increase in spindle density. (LLM, conf=0.89)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingcitation

    The memory-related enhancement of hippocampal activation during sleep was still present when tested 1 week after the encoding session.

    “The memory-related enhancement of hippocampal activation during sleep was still present when tested 1 week after the encoding session.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [272] source

      The Results (fMRI results; page unavailable) report an association between temporal memory and hippocampal activation during sleep. The Methods (Procedure; page unavailable) place imaging after the one-week memory test, but also describe renewed exposure to the game and song before imaging. The paper therefore does not establish that an enhancement measured at encoding persisted unchanged for one week. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [273] source

      The Results section states that left hippocampal activation for newly learned words was associated with puppet-name memory only at the same-session test. At the one-week memory test, that association was not statistically significant (rs(30) = .33, p = .07). The paper therefore does not report that a memory-related hippocampal effect remained present at one week. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    A number of studies revealed signs of improved abstraction of rules and regularities at a later test session when participants had slept after encoding, compared with a wake control condition.

    “a number of studies revealed signs of an improved abstraction of rules and regularities at a later test session when participants had slept after encoding of the stimulus materials, in comparison with a wake control condition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [35] 35. Wagner, U., Gais, S., Haider, H., Verleger, R., and Born, J. (2004). Sleep in- spires insight. Nature 427, 352-355. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02223. source
    • cites [36] 36. Lutz, N.D., Wolf, I., H€ ubner, S., and Rauss, K. (2018). Sleep strengthens predictive sequence coding. J. Neurosci. 17, 8989-9000. https://doi.org/ 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1352-18.2018. source
    • cites [37] 37. Sanders, K.E.G., Osburn, S., Paller, K.A., and Beeman, M. (2019). Targeted memory reactivation during sleep improves next-day problem solving. Psychol. Sci. 30, 1616-1624. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619873344. source

      The Abstract (page not provided) reports that numerous studies found better memory after sleep than after comparable time awake, and describes one study in which sleepers were more likely than awake participants to discover a hidden shortcut. It does not establish that a number of studies specifically found improved abstraction of rules and regularities at a later test; this paper’s own comparison is between cued and uncued puzzles among sleepers. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims. 108
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 26
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Extrahippocampal reactivations positively correlate and causally contribute to sleep-dependent memory consolidation.

    “Similar to hippocampal replay, extrahippocampal reactivations have also been shown to positively correlate 65 and causally contribute to sleep-dependent memory consolidation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [65] 65. Ramanathan, D.S., Gulati, T., and Ganguly, K. (2015). Sleep-dependent reactivation of ensembles in motor cortex promotes skill consolidation. PLoS Biol. 13, e1002263. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002263. source

      The Results (Lack of Reactivation during Later Stages of Learning) report a significant correlation between motor-cortex reactivation and offline improvements in movement speed. The Discussion calls reactivation a neural correlate and says the findings suggest a role in stabilizing motor patterns; it does not establish that reactivation causally contributes to consolidation. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [87] 87. Clawson, B.C., Pickup, E.J., Ensing, A., Geneseo, L., Shaver, J., Gonza- lez-Amoretti, J., Zhao, M., York, A.K., Kuhn, F.R., Swift, K., et al. (2021). Causal role for sleep-dependent reactivation of learning-activated sen- sory ensembles for fear memory consolidation. Nat. Commun. 12, 1200. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21471-2. source
    • cites [97] 97. Aly, M.H., Abdou, K., Okubo-Suzuki, R., Nomoto, M., and Inokuchi, K. (2022). Selective engram coreactivation in idling brain inspires implicit learning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119. e2201578119. https://doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.2201578119. source

      The Results section ('Interaction of Prestored Memories with New Related Experiences during Sleep Is Necessary to Induce Offline Assimilation'; page unavailable) says ACC reactivation is necessary for memory networking and implicit learning but dispensable for consolidation of the new memory. The Discussion reports a correlation with future memory integration, not consolidation. Thus the paper makes a contrary point about the claimed causal contribution to sleep-dependent memory consolidation. (LLM, conf=0.89)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Information flow during coordinated reactivation events appears organized in a loop-like manner, with cortical activity predicting hippocampal reactivations during SPW-Rs, and hippocampal reactivations leading extrahippocampal regions.

    “information flow during such coordinated reactivation events appears be organized in a loop-like manner, with activity in cortical regions predicting the content of hippocampal reactivations during SPW-Rs, 89 and hippocampal reactivations, in turn, leading reactivations in extrahippocampal regions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [89] 89. Rothschild, G., Eban, E., and Frank, L.M. (2017). A cortical-hippocampal- cortical loop of information processing during memory consolidation. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 251-259. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4457. source
    • cites [92] 92. O ´lafsdo ´ttir, H.F., Carpenter, F., and Barry, C. (2016). Coordinated grid and place cell replay during rest. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 792-794. https:// doi.org/10.1038/nn.4291. source

      The citation follows the claim that cortical activity predicts hippocampal reactivation during SPW-Rs. The paper instead reports that MEC grid-cell representations lag hippocampal CA1 during replay and suggests that replay sequences propagate from the hippocampus to MEC (p. 3). It does not establish the cited cortex-to-hippocampus direction. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [102] 102. Antony, J.W., Gobel, E.W., O'Hare, J.K., Reber, P.J., and Paller, K.A. (2012). Cued memory reactivation during sleep influences skill learning. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 1114-1116. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3152. 117. Cairney, S.A., Guttesen, A.A ´.V., El Marj, N., and Staresina, B.P. (2018). Memory consolidation is linked to spindle-mediated information pro- cessing during sleep. Curr. Biol. 28, 948-954.e4. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.cub.2018.01.087. 118. Rasch, B., B€ uchel, C., Gais, S., and Born, J. (2007). Odor cues during slow-wave sleep prompt declarative memory consolidation. Science 31 source

      The paper’s Abstract discusses sleep-cued memory reactivation and spindle activity, and its Online Methods describe scalp EEG recordings. Neither passage addresses cortical activity predicting hippocampal reactivation during SPW-Rs or hippocampal reactivation leading extrahippocampal activity. Searches for both directional relationships found no passage supporting the claimed loop-like information flow. (LLM, conf=0.77)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Spindles have been proposed as a mechanism that enables selective and reliable hippocampo-neocortical information exchange during sleep-dependent consolidation while suppressing interference from cortico-cortical and sensory information flow as in wake state.

    “From a wider angle, spindles have been proposed as a mechanism that enables selective and reliable hippocampo-neocortical information exchange during sleep-dependent consolidation, while at the same time suppressing possible interference from relaying cortico-cortical and sensory information flow as it occurs in the wake state.179,202”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [179] source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [202] source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Sleep spindles appear typically before the 3rd week after birth and may at this time also intrude into periods of active sleep.

    “First, sleep spindles appear typically before the 3rd week after birth and may at this time also intrude into periods of active sleep.244,251,252”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [244] source

      In Framework 3, under “Non-REM sleep may promote sensorimotor plasticity in human infants” (page unavailable), the paper says sleep spindles emerge around one month of age, not typically before the third week. It describes sleep spindles as specifically affiliated with non-REM sleep; the earlier activity it discusses during active sleep is spindle bursts, which it distinguishes from sleep spindles. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [251]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [252] source

      The Results section on NREM sleep cycles reports increased fast-spindle activity before transitions to REM sleep, not spindles occurring during active sleep in newborns. Searches for the third week after birth and newborn active sleep found no passage addressing when spindles first appear or whether they occur during active sleep at that age; page numbers were not provided. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Activity of these spindle-active cells remained at a relatively enhanced level at the end of REM sleep and during subsequent wake periods, in line with concurrent global downscaling and select upscaling preserving learning-related differences in scaling induced during prior wakefulness.

    “However, activity of these spindle-active cells remained at a relatively enhanced level at the end of REM sleep as well as during the subsequent wake periods, in line with the idea of concurrent global downscaling and select upscaling thereby preserving learning-related differences in scaling induced during prior wakefulness.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [166] source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingcitation

    Using fMRI and microstructural MRI in humans, with increasing number of repetitions activation of task-relevant neocortical areas increased, whereas activity in the hippocampus but also in medial prefrontal cortex was maximal on the first trial and decreased across trials.

    “Using fMRI and microstructural MRI in humans, these studies investigated changes in representations occurring with repeated retrievals on spatial (object-location and spatial navigation) and verbal (word lists) tasks and found that with increasing number of repetitions activation of task-relevant neocortical areas (such as the medial parietal cortex) increased, whereas activity in the hippocampus”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [290] source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [291] source
    • cites [292] source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [293] source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Sleep downscaling entails a reduction of dendritic synaptic spines, with branches involved in prior learning being spared.

    “(C) Sleep downscaling also entails a reduction of dendritic synaptic spines, with branches involved in prior learning (red) being spared (assessed by two-photon imaging, 164 left).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [164] source

      The paper’s Abstract reports that sleep after motor learning promotes spine formation and maintenance on selected branches, rather than a reduction in spines. In its comparison of trained branches (Fig. 1, D–F), it finds no significant difference in spine elimination between high- and low-formation branches. Its discussion of net synapse loss during sleep describes earlier studies, not the branch-specific result claimed here. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Himmer et al. observed a decrease in hippocampal fMRI activity with repeated retrieval of learned word lists during wakefulness, and this reduction in retrieval-related hippocampal activity remained stable only when the participants slept during the following night.

    “Himmer et al., 293 for example, observed a decrease in hippocampal fMRI activity with repeated retrieval of learned word lists during wakefulness, and this reduction in retrieval-related hippocampal activity remained stable only when the participants slept during the following night.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [293] source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 2 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Recent experiments have failed to reveal superior retrieval for post-encoding sleep compared with wake, and a few suggest enhanced forgetting by sleep.

    “recently, there has been a growing number of experiments failing to reveal superior retrieval of memory for post-encoding sleep compared with wake conditions, and a few studies even suggesting enhanced forgetting of memory by sleep.6,7”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [6] 6. Sawangjit, A., Harkotte, M., Oyanedel, C.N., Niethard, N., Born, J., and Inostroza, M. (2022). Two distinct ways to form long-term object recog- nition memory during sleep and wakefulness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119. e2203165119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2203165119. source

      In Results (‘Remote NOR Memory Is Context Dependent after Postencoding Sleep but Not Wakefulness’; page unavailable), rats tested in a different context retrieved object memory better after wakefulness than after sleep, supporting the claim that sleep does not always yield superior retrieval. But in the original context, Results report slightly better retrieval after sleep, and the Discussion attributes the poorer performance after sleep in the changed context to retrieval interference, not enhanced forgetting. This paper also cannot establish a growing number of such experiments. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [7] 7. Chouhan, N.S., Griffith, L.C., Haynes, P., and Sehgal, A. (2021). Availabil- ity of food determines the need for sleep in memory consolidation. Nature 589, 582-585. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2997-y. source

      The paper’s results report no effect of post-training sleep deprivation on long-term memory in starved flies, supporting a condition-specific lack of sleep benefit. They also report impaired memory after sleep deprivation in fed flies. The cited paper does not report a growing number of such experiments or suggest that sleep enhances forgetting; the only forgetting-related passage found is a reference title. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Sleep is a brain state characterized by large-scale organization of neuronal activity capturing virtually all brain regions.

    “Sleep is a brain state that is characterized by a large-scale organization of neuronal activity that captures virtually all brain regions”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [8] 8. McCormick, D.A., Nestvogel, D.B., and He, B.J. (2020). Neuromodulation of brain state and behavior. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 43, 391-415. https:// doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-100219-105424. source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) describes brain states in terms of neuronal and regional activity, and Cellular and Network Mechanisms of State-Dependent Activity says slow oscillations are prevalent during sleep. But the latter describes oscillations generated in local cortical regions; our copy does not establish that sleep organizes neuronal activity across virtually all brain regions. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Converging with human findings, rodent studies showed benefits from SWS for both hippocampus-dependent spatial and episodic-like memory as well as for memories considered non-hippocampus dependent.

    “converging with the findings in humans, these studies showed benefits from SWS for both hippocampus-dependent spatial and episodic-like memory as well as for memories considered non-hippocampus dependent”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [63] 63. Shein-Idelson, M., Ondracek, J.M., Liaw, H.P., Reiter, S., and Laurent, G. (2016). Slow waves, sharp waves, ripples, and REM in sleeping dragons. Science 352, 590-595. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf3621. source
    • cites [64] 64. Binder, S., Berg, K., Gasca, F., Lafon, B., Parra, L.C., Born, J., and Marshall, L. (2014). Transcranial slow oscillation stimulation during sleep enhances memory consolidation in rats. Brain Stimul. 7, 508-515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2014.03.001. source
    • cites [65] 65. Ramanathan, D.S., Gulati, T., and Ganguly, K. (2015). Sleep-dependent reactivation of ensembles in motor cortex promotes skill consolidation. PLoS Biol. 13, e1002263. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002263. source

      The Abstract and Discussion (page not provided) report improved motor-skill performance in rats after NREM sleep, with reactivation linked to slow-wave oscillations. The Introduction mentions prior hippocampus-dependent studies, but this paper does not report SWS benefits for spatial or episodic-like memory; it also does not isolate SWS as the cause of the motor benefit. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Memory reactivation occurs in species beyond rodents, such as zebra finch and fruit fly, underlining universality.

    “it occurs also in other species such as zebra finch and fruit fly 75,76 underlining the universality of the phenomenon.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [75] 75. Dag, U., Lei, Z., Le, J.Q., Wong, A., Bushey, D., and Keleman, K. (2019). Neuronal reactivation during post-learning sleep consolidates long-term memory in Drosophila. eLife 8, e42786. https://doi.org/10.7554/eL- ife.42786. source
    • cites [76] 76. Dave, A.S., and Margoliash, D. (2000). Song replay during sleep and computational rules for sensorimotor vocal learning. Science 290, 812-816. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.290.5492.812. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Sleep benefits procedural memories for perceptual and motor skills, which in theory do not require hippocampal function.

    “Benefits of sleep have likewise been observed for procedural memories for perceptual and motor skills [15][16][17] which, in theory, represent memories that do not require hippocampal function.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [15] 15. Mednick, S.C., Nakayama, K., Cantero, J.L., Atienza, M., Levin, A.A., Pa- thak, N., and Stickgold, R. (2002). The restorative effect of naps on perceptual deterioration. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 677-681. https://doi.org/10. 1038/nn864. source
    • cites [16] 16. Nettersheim, A., Hallschmid, M., Born, J., and Diekelmann, S. (2015). The role of sleep in motor sequence consolidation: stabilization rather than enhancement. J. Neurosci. 35, 6696-6702. https://doi.org/10.1523/ JNEUROSCI.1236-14.2015. source

      The Discussion (page unavailable in our copy) reports that sleep stabilizes or restores performance on a procedural finger-tapping task, supporting a benefit for motor skill memory. The study does not examine perceptual skills or establish that these memories do not require hippocampal function. It also distinguishes stabilization from additional performance gains. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [17] 17. Schmid, D., Erlacher, D., Klostermann, A., Kredel, R., and Hossner, E.J. (2020). Sleep-dependent motor memory consolidation in healthy adults: A meta-analysis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 118, 270-281. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.07.028. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Post-encoding sleep produces a greater memory benefit for aversive than neutral features of picture scenes.

    “when asked to remember picture scenes comprising neutral as well as aversive features, post-encoding sleep produced a greater memory benefit for the aversive than neutral features of the scene.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [24] 24. Payne, J.D., Stickgold, R., Swanberg, K., and Kensinger, E.A. (2008). Sleep preferentially enhances memory for emotional components of scenes. Psychol. Sci. 19, 781-788. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9280.2008.02157.x. source

      The supplied copy discusses investment and ownership (Results, p. 17), not sleep or memory. Searches for post-encoding sleep, aversive features, and picture scenes returned no passages for the cited DOI, so the claim cannot be checked against our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [25] 25. Nishida, M., Pearsall, J., Buckner, R.L., and Walker, M.P. (2009). REM sleep, prefrontal theta, and the consolidation of human emotional memory. Cereb. Cortex 19, 1158-1166. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn155. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    SWA can occasionally intrude into ongoing REM sleep.

    “slow-wave activity (SWA) can occasionally intrude into ongoing REM sleep”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [11] 11. Bernardi, G., Betta, M., Ricciardi, E., Pietrini, P., Tononi, G., and Siclari, F. (2019). Regional delta waves in human rapid eye movement sleep. J. Neurosci. 39, 2686-2697. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2298- 18.2019. source
    • cites [12] 12. Siclari, F., Bernardi, G., Riedner, B.A., LaRocque, J.J., Benca, R.M., and Tononi, G. (2014). Two distinct synchronization processes in the transi- tion to sleep: A high-density electroencephalo-graphic study. Sleep 37, 1621-1637. https://doi.org/10.5665/sleep.4070. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Enhancing effects of sleep appeared particularly pronounced for prospective memories of plans in some cases, whereas other studies failed to demonstrate similar effects.

    “enhancing effects of sleep appeared to be particularly pronounced for prospective memories of plans in some cases, 30,31 whereas other studies on salient prospective memory failed to demonstrate similar effects.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [30] 30. Barner, C., Seibold, M., Born, J., and Diekelmann, S. (2016). Consolidation of prospective memory: effects of sleep on completed and reinstated inten- tions. Front. Psychol. 7, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02025. source
    • cites [31] 31. Leong, R.L.F., Cheng, G.H., Chee, M.W.L., and Lo, J.C. (2019). The ef- fects of sleep on prospective memory: A systematic review and meta- analysis. Sleep Med. Rev. 47, 18-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv. 2019.05.006. source
    • cites [27] 27. Davidson, P., Jo ¨nsson, P., Carlsson, I., and Pace-Schott, E. (2021). Does sleep selectively strengthen certain memories over others based on emotion and perceived future relevance? Nat. Sci. Sleep 13, 1257- 1306. https://doi.org/10.2147/NSS.S286701. source

      The ‘Future Relevance’ interim summary reports that some studies found a greater sleep benefit when a memory test was expected, while others found no such effect. That supports the claim of mixed findings, but these passages concern test expectancy and other cues of future relevance, not prospective memories of plans or salient prospective-memory tasks specifically. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    There is also a number of studies that failed to demonstrate sleep-dependent memory abstraction effects, indicating specific boundary conditions.

    “there is also a number of studies that failed to demonstrate such effects, 39,40 indicating the existence of specific boundary conditions for sleep-dependent memory abstraction to occur.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [39] 39. Brodt, S., Po ¨hlchen, D., T€ aumer, E., Gais, S., and Scho ¨nauer, M. (2018a). Incubation, not sleep, aids problem-solving. Sleep 41, zsy155. https:// doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsy155. source
    • cites [40] 40. Talamini, L.M., van Moorselaar, D.V., Bakker, R., Bulath, M., Szegedi, S., Sinichi, M., and De Boer, M. (2022). No evidence for a preferential role of sleep in episodic memory abstraction. Front. Neurosci. 16, 871188. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.871188. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Reactivations in extrahippocampal/cortical areas tend to coincide with oscillatory hallmarks of memory consolidation during sleep, such as SOs and spindles, and with hippocampal SPW-Rs.

    “Reactivations in extrahippocampal/cortical areas tend to coincide with oscillatory hallmarks of memory consolidation during sleep, such as SOs and spindles, 65,88,90,96 but also with hippocampal SPW-Rs, 96,99,101,103”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim5 of 7 sources checked
    • cites [65] 65. Ramanathan, D.S., Gulati, T., and Ganguly, K. (2015). Sleep-dependent reactivation of ensembles in motor cortex promotes skill consolidation. PLoS Biol. 13, e1002263. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002263. source
    • cites [88] 88. Ji, D., and Wilson, M.A. (2007). Coordinated memory replay in the visual cortex and hippocampus during sleep. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 100-107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1825. source
    • cites [90] 90. Gulati, T., Guo, L., Ramanathan, D.S., Bodepudi, A., and Ganguly, K. (2017). Neural reactivations during sleep determine network credit assignment. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 1277-1284. https://doi.org/10.1038/ nn.4601. source

      The Results section (‘Changes in Functional Coupling During Sleep’; page unavailable) says cortical reactivation events are tightly related to slow oscillations. The Discussion (‘Neuroprosthetic Memory Consolidation and Slow Oscillations’; page unavailable) says spindles occur with activity during slow-oscillation UP states and notes a link between cortical slow oscillations and hippocampal ripples. It does not establish that the cortical reactivations themselves coincide with spindles or hippocampal sharp-wave ripples. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [96] 96. Wilber, A.A., Skelin, I., Wu, W., and McNaughton, B.L. (2017). Laminar orga- nization of encoding and memory reactivation in the parietal cortex. Neuron 95, 1406-1419.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.08.033. source

      The Discussion reports enhanced reactivation of behavioral templates in rat parietal cortex simultaneously with cortical delta waves and hippocampal CA1 sharp-wave ripples during sleep. This supports the cortical-reactivation and hippocampal-ripple portions, but our copy does not establish coincidence with sleep spindles or specifically identify the delta waves as slow oscillations (SOs). (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [99] 99. Peyrache, A., Khamassi, M., Benchenane, K., Wiener, S.I., and Battaglia, F.P. (2009). Replay of rule-learning related neural patterns in the prefron- tal cortex during sleep. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 919-926. https://doi.org/10. 1038/nn.2337. 100. Girardeau, G., Inema, I., and Buzsa ´ki, G. (2017). Reactivations of emotional memory in the hippocampus-amygdala system during sleep. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 1634-1642. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4637. 101. Gomperts, S.N., Kloosterman, F., and Wilson, M.A. (2015). VTA neurons coordinate with the hippocampal reactivation of spatial experience. eLife 4, e053 source
    • cites [101] 101. Schreiner, T., Petzka, M., Staudigl, T., and Staresina, B.P. (2021). Endog- enous memory reactivation during sleep in humans is clocked by slow oscillation-spindle complexes. Nat. Commun. 12, 3112. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41467-021-23520-2. 115. Hu, X., Cheng, L.Y., Chiu, M.H., and Paller, K.A. (2020). Promoting mem- ory consolidation during sleep: A meta-analysis of targeted memory re- activation. Psychol. Bull. 146, 218-244. https://doi.org/10.1037/ bul0000223. 116. source

      The Results and Discussion report that memory reactivation was timed to cortical slow-oscillation–spindle complexes. The Discussion explicitly says the study’s scalp EEG data remain agnostic about hippocampal ripples; although it discusses related ripple findings, it does not establish that the cortical reactivations observed here coincided with hippocampal sharp-wave ripples. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [103] 103. Antony, J.W., Ferreira, C.S., Norman, K.A., and Wimber, M. (2017). Retrieval as a fast route to memory consolidation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 21, 573-576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.05.001. 123. Cheng, L.Y., Che, T., Tomic, G., Slutzky, M.W., and Paller, K.A. (2021). Memory reactivation during sleep improves execution of a challenging motor skill. J. Neurosci. 41, 9608-9616. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUR- OSCI.0265-21.2021. 124. source

      In “Retrieval as a rapid consolidation event” (page not provided), the paper describes sleep reactivation in hippocampal-neocortical circuits facilitated by coordinated oscillatory interactions. It does not specify slow oscillations, spindles, or hippocampal sharp-wave ripples, or state that cortical reactivations tend to coincide with those events. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Disrupting postexposure hippocampal activity during SPW-Rs via electrical stimulation or optogenetic silencing diminished reinstatement of ensemble firing patterns and impaired memory recall.

    “Disrupting postexposure hippocampal activity during SPW-Rs via electrical stimulation or optogenetic silencing diminished reinstatement of ensemble firing patterns and, subsequently, impaired memory recall during re-exposure to the learning task.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [84] 84. Girardeau, G., Benchenane, K., Wiener, S.I., Buzsa ´ki, G., and Zugaro, M.B. (2009). Selective suppression of hippocampal ripples impairs spatial mem- ory. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 1222-1223. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2384. source
    • cites [85] 85. van de Ven, G.M., Trouche, S., McNamara, C.G., Allen, K., and Dupret, D. (2016). Hippocampal offline reactivation consolidates recently formed cell assembly patterns during sharp wave-ripples. Neuron 92, 968-974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.10.020. source

      The Results section reports that optogenetic silencing during postexposure sharp wave-ripples impaired assembly-pattern reinstatement during re-exposure to a novel enclosure, but not a familiar one. The Discussion attributes impaired spatial-memory performance after electrical stimulation to previous studies; this paper does not report that its optogenetic intervention impaired behavioral memory recall during re-exposure. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Reactivations were found to occur coupled to hippocampal ripples and to spindles coupled to SOs, but not to solitary SOs or spindles.

    “Reactivations were found to occur coupled to the oscillatory hallmarks of non-REM sleep, specifically to hippocampal ripples 112 and to spindles coupled to SOs, but not to solitary SOs or spindles”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [112] 112. Helfrich, R.F., Lendner, J.D., Mander, B.A., Guillen, H., Paff, M., Mnatsa- kanyan, L., Vadera, S., Walker, M.P., Lin, J.J., and Knight, R.T. (2019). Bidirectional prefrontal-hippocampal dynamics organize information transfer during sleep in humans. Nat. Commun. 10, 3572. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41467-019-11444-x. 187. source
    • cites [114] 114. Khodagholy, D., Gelinas, J.N., and Buzsa ´ki, G. (2017). Learning- enhanced coupling between ripple oscillations in association cortices and hippocampus. Science 358, 369-372. 192. source

      The paper reports that hippocampal ripples co-occur with cortical ripples during NREM sleep and links ripple coupling to the transfer of memory traces (Abstract; passage on Fig. 2). This supports an association between hippocampal ripples and memory-related activity, but it does not report measuring reactivations coupled to those ripples. Citation 112 follows “hippocampal ripples,” so the later comparison with solitary SOs or spindles is not treated as attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.79)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Hippocampal replay occurs temporally coupled to hippocampal SPW-Rs, which appear predominantly during non-REM sleep and during immobility.

    “Hippocampal replay occurs temporally coupled to hippocampal SPW-Rs, a characteristic pattern in the hippocampal LFP consisting of a large amplitude negative deflection originating from CA3, followed by a short fast oscillation in the range of 110-200 Hz, which appears predominantly during non-REM sleep, but also more generally during periods of immobility.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [82] 82. Buzsa ´ki, G. (2015). Hippocampal sharp wave-ripple: A cognitive biomarker for episodic memory and planning. Hippocampus 25, 1073- 1188. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.22488. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Representations of rewarded spatial locations are preferentially reactivated in both wake and sleep states, although there are also findings of a bias in the opposite direction.

    “representations of rewarded spatial locations are preferentially reactivated in both wake and sleep states, 80,81,[142][143][144] although there are also findings of a bias of reactivations in the opposite direction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 7 sources checked
    • cites [80] 80. Diba, K., and Buzsa ´ki, G. (2007). Forward and reverse hippocampal place-cell sequences during ripples. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 1241-1242. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1961. source
    • cites [81] 81. Foster, D.J., and Wilson, M.A. (2006). Reverse replay of behavioural se- quences in hippocampal place cells during the awake state. Nature 440, 680-683. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04587. source
    • cites [142] source

      The Abstract reports that awake reverse replay at reward locations increased with increased reward, while forward replay did not. The Introduction says replay also occurs during slow-wave sleep, but our copy does not establish preferential reactivation of rewarded locations during sleep. The cited paper therefore supports the awake component, not the claim across both states. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [143] source

      The Discussion (p. 8) reports a bias toward replay of the highly rewarded arm during awake learning and the subsequent rest period. The Results (p. 5) describe the delay period as quiescence, not a measured sleep state, so this paper does not establish preferential reactivation specifically during sleep. The opposite-direction finding appears after the citation and is not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [144] source

      The ‘Trajectory events over-represent a known goal location’ section reports that hippocampal events over-represented the rewarded HOME location during awake behavior. The paper mentions replay during sleep, but does not report preferential reactivation of rewarded locations during sleep. The citation appears before the separate clause about a bias in the opposite direction. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [145] source
    • cites [146] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In hippocampal networks, rates of replay and reactivation are highest within the first 10-30 min of post-encoding sleep and rapidly fade later.

    “In hippocampal networks, rates of replay and reactivation are highest within the first 10-30 min of post-encoding sleep and appear to rapidly fade later.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [79] 79. Wilson, M.A., and McNaughton, B.L. (1994). Reactivation of hippocam- pal ensemble memories during sleep. Science 265, 676-679. https:// doi.org/10.1126/science.8036517. source
    • cites [88] 88. Ji, D., and Wilson, M.A. (2007). Coordinated memory replay in the visual cortex and hippocampus during sleep. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 100-107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1825. source
    • cites [100] 100. Maquet, P., Laureys, S., Peigneux, P., Fuchs, S., Petiau, C., Phillips, C., Aerts, J., Del Fiore, G., Degueldre, C., Meulemans, T., et al. (2000). Expe- rience-dependent changes in cerebral activation during human REM sleep. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 831-836. https://doi.org/10.1038/77744. 107. Peigneux, P., Laureys, S., Fuchs, S., Collette, F., Perrin, F., Reggers, J., Phil- lips, C., Degueldre, C., Del Fiore, G., Aerts, J., et al. (2004). Are spatial mem- ories strengthened in the human hippocampus during slow wave sleep? Neuron 44, 535-545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.10.007. 108. Be source
    • cites [131] 131. Friedrich, M., Mo ¨lle, M., Born, J., and Friederici, A.D. (2022). Memory for nonadjacent dependencies in the first year of life and its relation to sleep. Nat. Commun. 13, 7896. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35558-x. 272. Mooney, L.N., Johnson, E.G., Prabhakar, J., and Ghetti, S. (2021). Mem- ory-related hippocampal activation during sleep and temporal memory in toddlers. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 47, 100908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. dcn.2020.100908. 273. Johnson, E.G., Mooney, L., Graf Estes, K., Nordahl, C.W., and Ghetti, S. (2021). Activation for newly learned words in left medial-t source

      The Discussion discusses possible hippocampal involvement in infants’ memory, and Methods > Procedure reports an average nap duration of 39.6 minutes; neither addresses rates of hippocampal replay or reactivation. Searches for replay, reactivation, and a 10–30-minute post-encoding peak found no passage supporting the claimed time course. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    REM reactivation differs from that during SWS: it occurs independently of SPW-Rs, shows no temporal compression, and mainly occurs during pre-task sleep.

    “REM reactivation differs from that during SWS, as it occurs independently of SPW-Rs, shows no temporal compression and mainly occurs during pre-task sleep.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [68] 68. Eckert, M.J., McNaughton, B.L., and Tatsuno, M. (2020). Neural ensemble reactivation in rapid eye movement and slow-wave sleep co- ordinate with muscle activity to promote rapid motor skill learning. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 375, 20190655. https://doi.org/10.1098/ rstb.2019.0655. source

      The Results, §2(b), report stronger REM activation in Rest 1 (pre-task sleep) than in Rest 2. Results §2(a) found no evidence of temporally compressed replay, but also detected no clear sequential reactivation in either REM or SWS. Our copy does not establish that REM reactivation occurs independently of sharp-wave ripples. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [135] 135. Brodt, S., Po ¨hlchen, D., Flanagin, V.L., Glasauer, S., Gais, S., and Scho ¨- nauer, M. (2016). Rapid and independent memory formation in the pari- etal cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 13251-13256. https://doi. org/10.1073/pnas.1605719113. 293. Himmer, L., Scho ¨nauer, M., Heib, D.P.J., Schabus, M., and Gais, S. (2019). Rehearsal initiates systems memory consolidation, sleep makes it last. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav1695. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv. aav1695. 294. source

      The Discussion mentions neuronal reactivation during sleep only in general terms, while the Results examine brain activity across repeated maze-learning encounters. Searches for REM reactivation, SPW-Rs, temporal compression, and pre-task sleep found no passage addressing the claimed differences from SWS. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Timing of cue delivery in relation to SOs, spindles, or spindle refractory periods, or phase-coupling of spindles to SO peak or trough may substantially affect the effect of TMR on memory performance.

    “timing of cue delivery in relation to SOs, 129 spindles, or spindle refractory periods, respectively, 116,117,127 or the phase-coupling of spindles to the SO peak or trough 125 may substantially affect the effect of TMR on memory performance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim4 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [129] 129. Muessig, L., Lasek, M., Varsavsky, I., Cacucci, F., and Wills, T.J. (2019). Coordinated emergence of hippocampal replay and theta sequences during post-natal development. Curr. Biol. 29, 834-840.e4. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.01.005. 256. Farooq, U., and Dragoi, G. (2019). Emergence of preconfigured and plas- tic time-compressed sequences in early postnatal development. Science 363, 168-173. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav0502. 257. Prehn-Kristensen, A., Go ¨der, R., Chirobeja, S., Bressmann, I., Ferstl, R., and Baving, L. (2009). Sleep in children enhances preferentially emo source

      The Results and Discussion passage concerns hippocampal replay and theta sequences during rat development, not cue delivery or targeted memory reactivation. Searches for TMR timing and for spindle coupling to slow-oscillation peaks or troughs found no passage addressing their effects on memory performance. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [116] 116. Staresina, B.P., Bergmann, T.O., Bonnefond, M., van der Meij, R., Jen- sen, O., Deuker, L., Elger, C.E., Axmacher, N., and Fell, J. (2015). Hierar- chical nesting of slow oscillations, spindles and ripples in the human hip- pocampus during sleep. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1679-1686. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/nn.4119. 198. Mo ¨lle, M., and Born, J. (2011). Slow oscillations orchestrating fast oscil- lations and memory consolidation. In Prog. Brain Res., 193, pp. 93-110. 199. Oyanedel, C.N., Dura ´n, E., Niethard, N., Inostroza, M., and Born, J. (2020). Temporal associations between sleep slow osci source

      The Results (Event-locked analysis; page unavailable) show that spindle power varies with SO phase, supporting the phase-coupling part of the citation. The paper does not test TMR cues or whether this coupling affects TMR-related memory performance; the Discussion says whether the observed coupling directly relates to episodic memory remains an open question. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [117] 117. Aston-Jones, G., and Bloom, F.E. (1981). Activity of norepinephrine-con- taining locus coeruleus neurons in behaving rats anticipates fluctuations in the sleep-waking cycle. J. Neurosci. 1, 876-886. https://doi.org/10. 1523/JNEUROSCI.01-08-00876.1981. 207. Berridge, C.W. (2008). Noradrenergic modulation of arousal. Brain Res. Rev. 58, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.10.013. 208. Rodenkirch, C., Liu, Y., Schriver, B.J., and Wang, Q. (2019). Locus coeru- leus activation enhances thalamic feature selectivity via norepinephrine regulation of intrathalamic circuit dynamics. Na source
    • cites [127] 127. Purcell, S.M., Manoach, D.S., Demanuele, C., Cade, B.E., Mariani, S., Cox, R., Panagiotaropoulou, G., Saxena, R., Pan, J.Q., Smoller, J.W., et al. (2017). Characterizing sleep spindles in 11,630 individuals from the National Sleep Research Resource. Nat. Commun. 8, 15930. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15930. 253. source

      The Results section on changes within NREM sleep cycles describes variation in spindle activity, but does not examine cue delivery or TMR memory performance. Searches of our copy for spindle refractory periods, targeted memory reactivation, and SO–spindle phase coupling found no passage linking their timing to TMR outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [125] 125. Seibt, J., Richard, C.J., Sigl-Glo ¨ckner, J., Takahashi, N., Kaplan, D.I., Doron, G., de Limoges, D., Bocklisch, C., and Larkum, M.E. (2017). Cortical dendritic activity correlates with spindle-rich oscillations during sleep in rodents. Nat. Commun. 8, 684. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-017-00735-w. 241. source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) reports coupling between sleep spindles and dendritic calcium activity, but says its relationship to cognitive function remains to be determined. Searches for spindle coupling to SO peaks or troughs and for TMR cue timing found no passage addressing whether either affects memory performance. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Studies directly comparing non-REM and REM sleep found no evidence for hippocampal place cell reactivations or coordinated hippocampal-subcortical reactivations in a spatial task with an aversive emotional component during REM sleep.

    “Studies directly comparing non-REM and REM sleep found no evidence for hippocampal place cell reactivations 131 or coordinated hippocampal-subcortical reactivations in a spatial task with an aversive emotional component 100 during REM sleep.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [131] 131. Friedrich, M., Mo ¨lle, M., Born, J., and Friederici, A.D. (2022). Memory for nonadjacent dependencies in the first year of life and its relation to sleep. Nat. Commun. 13, 7896. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35558-x. 272. Mooney, L.N., Johnson, E.G., Prabhakar, J., and Ghetti, S. (2021). Mem- ory-related hippocampal activation during sleep and temporal memory in toddlers. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 47, 100908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. dcn.2020.100908. 273. Johnson, E.G., Mooney, L., Graf Estes, K., Nordahl, C.W., and Ghetti, S. (2021). Activation for newly learned words in left medial-t source

      The Results passages concern infants’ memory for speech patterns after a nap, including associations with non-REM sleep and spindles; they do not report a direct non-REM-versus-REM comparison. Searches for REM sleep, hippocampal reactivation, and an aversive spatial task found no passage addressing the claim. No page numbers were provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [100] 100. Maquet, P., Laureys, S., Peigneux, P., Fuchs, S., Petiau, C., Phillips, C., Aerts, J., Del Fiore, G., Degueldre, C., Meulemans, T., et al. (2000). Expe- rience-dependent changes in cerebral activation during human REM sleep. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 831-836. https://doi.org/10.1038/77744. 107. Peigneux, P., Laureys, S., Fuchs, S., Collette, F., Perrin, F., Reggers, J., Phil- lips, C., Degueldre, C., Del Fiore, G., Aerts, J., et al. (2004). Are spatial mem- ories strengthened in the human hippocampus during slow wave sleep? Neuron 44, 535-545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.10.007. 108. Be source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Reactivation of ensemble firing patterns occurs during quiet rest and active behavior in rodents and humans, as well as during sleep.

    “Reactivation of ensemble firing patterns was first identified during sleep, 79,136 but the phenomenon occurs likewise during quiet rest as well as during active behavior, in rodents 80,81,137,138 as well as in humans.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim5 of 9 sources checked
    • cites [79] 79. Wilson, M.A., and McNaughton, B.L. (1994). Reactivation of hippocam- pal ensemble memories during sleep. Science 265, 676-679. https:// doi.org/10.1126/science.8036517. source
    • cites [136] 136. Aru, J., Dr€ uke, M., Pikam€ ae, J., and Larkum, M.E. (2023). Mental naviga- tion and the neural mechanisms of insight. Trends Neurosci. 46, 100-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2022.11.002. source
    • cites [80] 80. Diba, K., and Buzsa ´ki, G. (2007). Forward and reverse hippocampal place-cell sequences during ripples. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 1241-1242. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1961. source
    • cites [81] 81. Foster, D.J., and Wilson, M.A. (2006). Reverse replay of behavioural se- quences in hippocampal place cells during the awake state. Nature 440, 680-683. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04587. source
    • cites [137] source
    • cites [138] source
    • cites [104] 104. Cousins, J.N., El-Deredy, W., Parkes, L.M., Hennies, N., and Lewis, P.A. (2014). Cued memory reactivation during slow-wave sleep promotes explicit knowledge of a motor sequence. J. Neurosci. 34, 15870- 15876. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1011-14.2014. 125. Nicolas, J., King, B.R., Levesque, D., Lazzouni, L., Coffey, E., Swinnen, S., Doyon, J., Carrier, J., and Albouy, G. (2022). Sigma oscillations pro- tect or reinstate motor memory depending on their temporal coordination with slow waves. eLife 11, e73930. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73930. 126. van Dongen, E.V., Takashima, A., Ba source

      The Introduction reports that rodent neuronal firing sequences recur during sleep and that human studies show reactivation of learning-related brain regions during sleep. It does not say reactivation was first identified during sleep. The citations attached to quiet rest and active behavior are separate, and this paper does not address those settings. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [105] 105. Batterink, L.J., Creery, J.D., and Paller, K.A. (2016). Phase of sponta- neous slow oscillations during sleep influences memory-related process- ing of auditory cues. J. Neurosci. 36, 1401-1409. https://doi.org/10. 1523/JNEUROSCI.3175-15.2016. 130. Bendor, D., and Wilson, M.A. (2012). Biasing the content of hippocampal replay during sleep. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 1439-1444. https://doi.org/10. 1038/nn.3203. 131. Kudrimoti, H.S., Barnes, C.A., and McNaughton, B.L. (1999). Reactiva- tion of hippocampal cell assemblies: effects of behavioral state, experi- ence, and EEG dynamics. J. Neurosci. 19, source

      The Discussion reports reactivation in rat hippocampal ensembles during slow-wave sleep and quiet wakefulness; the ‘Sleep per se is unnecessary for trace reactivation’ section also documents it in an alert but relatively motionless rat. The paper does not establish reactivation during active behavior or in humans: active running supplied the preceding experience whose patterns were later reactivated. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [112] 112. Helfrich, R.F., Lendner, J.D., Mander, B.A., Guillen, H., Paff, M., Mnatsa- kanyan, L., Vadera, S., Walker, M.P., Lin, J.J., and Knight, R.T. (2019). Bidirectional prefrontal-hippocampal dynamics organize information transfer during sleep in humans. Nat. Commun. 10, 3572. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41467-019-11444-x. 187. source

      The Introduction says hippocampal ripples during NREM sleep facilitate reactivation of recently learned information. It does not establish that reactivation of ensemble firing patterns was first identified during sleep. The quiet-rest and active-behavior portions of the citing sentence have separate citations and are not attributed to this paper. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Human studies suggest a shift in reactivation probabilities in favor of cued stimuli, showing a negative effect of TMR for consolidation of uncued memories.

    “Such a shift in reactivation probabilities in favor of the cued stimuli is likewise suggested by studies in humans, which show a negative effect of TMR for the consolidation of uncued memories.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [122] 122. Salehinejad, M.A., Ghanavati, E., Reinders, J., Hengstler, J.G., Kuo, M.F., and Nitsche, M.A. (2022). Sleep-dependent upscaled excitability, satu- rated neuroplasticity, and modulated cognition in the human brain. eLife 11, e69308. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69308. 231. Li, W., Ma, L., Yang, G., and Gan, W.B. (2017). REM sleep selectively prunes and maintains new synapses in development and learning. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 427-437. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4479. 232. Grosmark, A.D., Mizuseki, K., Pastalkova, E., Diba, K., and Buzsa ´ki, G. (2012). REM sleep reorganizes hippocampal excita source

      The Results section on learning, memory, and cognitive performance and the Discussion compare sufficient sleep with sleep deprivation; they do not report targeted memory reactivation (TMR). Searches for TMR, reactivation probabilities, and uncued memories found no passage addressing whether cueing impairs consolidation of uncued memories. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [124] 124. Aime, M., Calcini, N., Borsa, M., Campelo, T., Rusterholz, T., Sattin, A., Fellin, T., and Adamantidis, A. (2022). Paradoxical somatodendritic de- coupling supports cortical plasticity during REM sleep. Science 376, 724-730. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abk2734. 236. Dong, Y., Li, J., Zhou, M., Du, Y., and Liu, D. (2022). Cortical regulation of two-stage rapid eye movement sleep. Nat. Neurosci. 25, 1675-1682. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-022-01195-2. 237. Wang, Z., Fei, X., Liu, X., Wang, Y., Hu, Y., Peng, W., Wang, Y.W., Zhang, S., and Xu, M. (2022). REM sleep is associated with dis source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Cue delivery during TMR is associated with increased SO power, amplitude and density, increased spindle power and density, and improved SO-spindle coupling, often associated with TMR-induced memory advantage.

    “It is associated with increased SO power, amplitude and density, 120,125,128 increased spindle power and density, 116,117,120,128 as well as improved SO-spindle coupling, 120 and these characteristics are often associated with the TMRinduced memory advantage.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [120] 120. Boyce, R., Glasgow, S.D., Williams, S., and Adamantidis, A. (2016). Causal evidence for the role of REM sleep theta rhythm in contextual memory consolidation. Science 352, 812-816. https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.aad5252. 222. source
    • cites [125] 125. Seibt, J., Richard, C.J., Sigl-Glo ¨ckner, J., Takahashi, N., Kaplan, D.I., Doron, G., de Limoges, D., Bocklisch, C., and Larkum, M.E. (2017). Cortical dendritic activity correlates with spindle-rich oscillations during sleep in rodents. Nat. Commun. 8, 684. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-017-00735-w. 241. source

      The Results section reports that greater sigma–beta power reflects greater spindle density in rats, but does not link either measure to cue delivery. The Discussion says the relationship between spindle-related activity and cognitive function remains to be determined. Searches for TMR cues, slow-oscillation changes, SO–spindle coupling, and a TMR-induced memory advantage found no passage addressing those claims. (LLM, conf=0.75)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [128] 128. Schoch, S.F., Riedner, B.A., Deoni, S.C., Huber, R., LeBourgeois, M.K., and Kurth, S. (2018). Across-night dynamics in traveling sleep slow waves throughout childhood. Sleep 41, zsy165. https://doi.org/10. 1093/sleep/zsy165. 254. Timofeev, I., Schoch, S.F., LeBourgeois, M.K., Huber, R., Riedner, B.A., and Kurth, S. (2020). Spatio-temporal properties of sleep slow waves and implications for development. Curr. Opin. Physiol. 15, 172-182. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.cophys.2020.01.007. 255. source

      The “Function of propagating SO” section links slow waves to sleep-dependent memory consolidation and reports stronger fast-spindle coupling for global slow waves. It does not address TMR cue delivery or report the claimed increases in SO or spindle measures, improved coupling after cues, or a TMR-induced memory advantage. Searches for TMR and cue delivery found no relevant passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [116] 116. Staresina, B.P., Bergmann, T.O., Bonnefond, M., van der Meij, R., Jen- sen, O., Deuker, L., Elger, C.E., Axmacher, N., and Fell, J. (2015). Hierar- chical nesting of slow oscillations, spindles and ripples in the human hip- pocampus during sleep. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1679-1686. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/nn.4119. 198. Mo ¨lle, M., and Born, J. (2011). Slow oscillations orchestrating fast oscil- lations and memory consolidation. In Prog. Brain Res., 193, pp. 93-110. 199. Oyanedel, C.N., Dura ´n, E., Niethard, N., Inostroza, M., and Born, J. (2020). Temporal associations between sleep slow osci source

      The Results (Event-locked analysis; page unavailable) show increased spindle power during SO up-states and SO–spindle coupling during sleep. The paper does not report TMR cue delivery or show that cues increase SO or spindle measures, improve coupling, or produce a TMR-induced memory advantage. The Discussion explicitly says whether the observed coupling directly relates to episodic memory remains an open question. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [117] 117. Aston-Jones, G., and Bloom, F.E. (1981). Activity of norepinephrine-con- taining locus coeruleus neurons in behaving rats anticipates fluctuations in the sleep-waking cycle. J. Neurosci. 1, 876-886. https://doi.org/10. 1523/JNEUROSCI.01-08-00876.1981. 207. Berridge, C.W. (2008). Noradrenergic modulation of arousal. Brain Res. Rev. 58, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.10.013. 208. Rodenkirch, C., Liu, Y., Schriver, B.J., and Wang, Q. (2019). Locus coeru- leus activation enhances thalamic feature selectivity via norepinephrine regulation of intrathalamic circuit dynamics. Na source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    TMR biases the content of memory reactivations toward targeted memory information but does not appear to increase the overall number of reactivation events.

    “these studies revealed that, while biasing the content of memory reactivations toward the targeted memory information, TMR does not appear to increase the overall number of reactivation events.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [89] 89. Rothschild, G., Eban, E., and Frank, L.M. (2017). A cortical-hippocampal- cortical loop of information processing during memory consolidation. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 251-259. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4457. source
    • cites [130] 130. Friedrich, M., Mo ¨lle, M., Friederici, A.D., and Born, J. (2020). Sleep- dependent memory consolidation in infants protects new episodic mem- ories from existing semantic memories. Nat. Commun. 11, 1298. https:// doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14850-8. 271. source

      The Results section on frontal sleep spindles links spindle activity during infants’ naps to later episodic-memory responses, but does not assess targeted memory reactivation. Searches for TMR, sleep cues, and reactivation-event frequency found no passage comparing the content or overall number of reactivation events. (LLM, conf=0.77)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Both sleep and wake replay can represent knowledge about an environment and share anticipatory features, including offline pre-activations of trajectories entailing visible but yet unexplored paths and locations.

    “both sleep and wake replay can represent knowledge about an environment and also share anticipatory features, such that they can e.g., include offline ''pre-activations'' of trajectories entailing visible but yet unexplored paths and locations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [144] source

      The Abstract reports trajectory sequences that predict future behavior, including novel combinations of start and goal locations, and mentions replay during both sleep and wakefulness. The section ‘Trajectory events actively and flexibly reflect task demands’ specifies that the novel paths were over familiar terrain. The paper does not establish that sleep and wake replay both pre-activate visible but unexplored paths or locations. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [148] source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) says awake replay can express stored trajectories remote from the rat and resembles sequence reactivation during slow-wave sleep. It also suggests replay may represent possible future paths. But the paper describes these as stored sequences on a track the rats had explored; it does not establish pre-activation of paths or locations they had not yet explored, in either sleep or wake replay. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [149] source

      The Results (page unavailable) report offline preplay of the visible, unvisited, food-cued arm during rest, and the Discussion interprets it as preparation for future experience. The paper does not establish that both sleep and wake replay share this anticipatory feature; its reported finding concerns preplay during the specified rest period. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Neural activity during REM sleep can be modulated by prior wake experience and there have been occasional reports of reactivation-like phenomena in REM sleep.

    “neural activity during REM sleep can be modulated by prior wake experience 106,134 and there have been occasional reports of reactivation-like phenomena in REM sleep.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 6 sources checked
    • cites [106] 106. Poe, G.R., Nitz, D.A., McNaughton, B.L., and Barnes, C.A. (2000). Expe- rience-dependent phase-reversal of hippocampal neuron firing during REM sleep. Brain Res. 855, 176-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006- 8993(99)02310-0. 135. Louie, K., and Wilson, M.A. (2001). Temporally structured replay of awake hippocampal ensemble activity during rapid eye movement sleep. Neuron 29, 145-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00186-6. 136. Pavlides, C., and Winson, J. (1989). Influences of hippocampal place cell firing in the awake state on the activity of these cells during subsequent sleep ep source
    • cites [134] 134. Brodt, S., Gais, S., Beck, J., Erb, M., Scheffler, K., and Scho ¨nauer, M. (2018). Fast track to the neocortex: A memory engram in the posterior pa- rietal cortex. Science 362, 1045-1048. https://doi.org/10.1126/science. aau2528. 292. source
    • cites [68] 68. Eckert, M.J., McNaughton, B.L., and Tatsuno, M. (2020). Neural ensemble reactivation in rapid eye movement and slow-wave sleep co- ordinate with muscle activity to promote rapid motor skill learning. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 375, 20190655. https://doi.org/10.1098/ rstb.2019.0655. source
    • cites [113] 113. Niethard, N., Burgalossi, A., and Born, J. (2017). Plasticity during sleep is linked to specific regulation of cortical circuit activity. Front. Neural Cir- cuits 11, 65. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2017.00065. 188. Schreiner, T., Kaufmann, E., Noachtar, S., Mehrkens, J.H., and Staudigl, T. (2022). The human thalamus orchestrates neocortical oscillations dur- ing NREM sleep. Nat. Commun. 13, 5231. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-022-32840-w. 189. Alizadeh, Z., Azimi, A., and Ghorbani, M. (2022). Enhancement of hippo- campal-thalamocortical temporal coordination during slow-frequency lon source
    • cites [135] 135. Brodt, S., Po ¨hlchen, D., Flanagin, V.L., Glasauer, S., Gais, S., and Scho ¨- nauer, M. (2016). Rapid and independent memory formation in the pari- etal cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 13251-13256. https://doi. org/10.1073/pnas.1605719113. 293. Himmer, L., Scho ¨nauer, M., Heib, D.P.J., Schabus, M., and Gais, S. (2019). Rehearsal initiates systems memory consolidation, sleep makes it last. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav1695. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv. aav1695. 294. source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) describes neuronal reactivation during sleep in the context of prior learning. It does not identify REM sleep or report that prior waking experience modulates neural activity specifically during REM sleep. The citation is attached to that first clause, not to the subsequent statement about occasional reactivation-like phenomena. (LLM, conf=0.79)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [136] 136. Aru, J., Dr€ uke, M., Pikam€ ae, J., and Larkum, M.E. (2023). Mental naviga- tion and the neural mechanisms of insight. Trends Neurosci. 46, 100-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2022.11.002. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    SO downstates and subsequent spindles recorded in ANT preceded respective downstates and spindles in frontal cortex by 50 and 100 ms, respectively, suggesting a leading role of ANT in initiation of SO-spindles and optimizing their phase-amplitude coupling.

    “SO downstates and subsequent spindles recorded in ANT preceded respective downstates and spindles in frontal cortex recordings by 50 and 100 ms, respectively, suggesting a leading role of the ANT in the initiation of SO-spindles and in optimizing their phase-amplitude coupling.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Ripples occur with an oscillatory frequency of 80 Hz (in humans) in hippocampal networks in conjunction with a sharp wave arising from cornu ammonis 3 (CA3).

    “Ripples occur with an oscillatory frequency of 80 Hz (in humans) in hippocampal networks in conjunction with a sharp wave arising from cornu ammonis 3 (CA3).82”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [82] 82. Buzsa ´ki, G. (2015). Hippocampal sharp wave-ripple: A cognitive biomarker for episodic memory and planning. Hippocampus 25, 1073- 1188. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.22488. source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) describes hippocampal ripples coupled to sharp waves, and “Various Inputs Can Induce CA1 Ripples” says sharp-wave bursts most often emerge from CA2–CA3a networks. The claimed 80 Hz human ripple frequency is not supported: the Introduction gives 110–200 Hz for ripples, while “Coordination of Fast Oscillations in CA3 and CA1 Regions” describes 80–90 Hz as a putative boundary between gamma and epsilon oscillations, not a ripple frequency. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Spindle activity is increased over cortical regions involved in prior learning, positively correlates with post-sleep retrieval performance, and appears to accompany memory reactivations during sleep.

    “Spindle activity is increased over cortical regions involved in prior learning and, moreover, positively correlates with post sleep retrieval performance 180,181 and appears to accompany memory reactivations during sleep.108,114”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [180] source

      The Results report increased spindle density after learning, greatest at the frontal Fz electrode, and a positive correlation with recall performance after sleep. Neither the Results nor Discussion establishes that the increase occurred over cortical regions involved in the prior learning task. The separate citations 108 and 114 attach to the memory-reactivation clause, so that clause is not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [181] source

      The Results (Sleep spindle analysis; page unavailable) report that the learning-minus-non-learning hemisphere difference in spindle density and power positively correlated with motor-memory improvement after the nap. They found no significant increase in spindle density or power in the learning hemisphere compared with the non-learning hemisphere, and neither electrode alone showed a significant correlation. The memory-reactivation clause has separate citations and is not attributed to this paper. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [108] 108. Davidson, T.J., Kloosterman, F., and Wilson, M.A. (2009). Hippocampal replay of extended experience. Neuron 63, 497-507. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.neuron.2009.07.027. 149. O ´lafsdo ´ttir, H.F., Barry, C., Saleem, A.B., Hassabis, D., and Spiers, H.J. (2015). Hippocampal place cells construct reward related sequences through unexplored space. eLife 4, e06063. https://doi.org/10.7554/eL- ife.06063. 150. Stella, F., Baracskay, P., O'Neill, J., and Csicsvari, J. (2019). Hippocam- pal reactivation of random trajectories resembling brownian diffusion. Neuron 102, 450-461.e7. e457. https://doi. source

      The Discussion reports coordinated memory reactivation in the hippocampus and visual cortex during slow-wave-sleep up-states, alongside hippocampal ripples. It does not say that spindle activity accompanies those reactivations; spindles appear only in cited reference titles. The earlier claims about learning-related cortical increases and retrieval performance are attached to different citations. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Ripples also occur during quiet wakefulness and outside the hippocampus, including entorhinal cortex and neocortex.

    “They also occur during quiet wakefulness, and outside the hippocampus, including entorhinal cortex and neocortex.[190][191][192]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [190] source
    • cites [191] source

      The passage on posterior parietal cortex (section labeled Abstract; page unavailable) reports ripples during quiet wakefulness, and other passages report ripples in neocortical association areas. The paper mentions the entorhinal cortex as a possible route of excitation, but does not report ripples occurring there. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [192] source

      The Results section, “Ripple Detection during NREM and Waking” (page unavailable), reports hippocampal ripples during waking and cortical ripples in all lobes during waking, supporting occurrence outside the hippocampus, including neocortex. It does not specify quiet wakefulness, and the Discussion mentions entorhinal cortex without reporting ripples there. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Decoding classification accuracy strongly depended on the precision of SO-spindle coupling, which in turn strongly correlated with memory performance after sleep.

    “However decoding classification accuracy strongly depended on the precision of SO-spindle coupling, which in turn strongly correlated with memory performance after sleep.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [114] 114. Khodagholy, D., Gelinas, J.N., and Buzsa ´ki, G. (2017). Learning- enhanced coupling between ripple oscillations in association cortices and hippocampus. Science 358, 369-372. 192. source

      The passages on sleep oscillations (section labeled Abstract; page unavailable) describe ripple–spindle timing and ripples occurring near slow-oscillation transitions. The postlearning passage reports stronger hippocampal–cortical ripple coupling. Searches for decoding classification accuracy and slow-oscillation–spindle coupling found no passage linking coupling precision to decoding accuracy or post-sleep memory performance. (LLM, conf=0.77)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Fine-grained temporal analyses revealed a second type of slow (7-12 Hz) spindle that accompanies the up-to-downstate transition of the SO, shows a more frontal cortical distribution, and is probably of different origin.

    “Fine-grained temporal analyses of event patterns revealed a second type of slow (7-12 Hz) spindle that accompanies the up-to-downstate transition of the SO, shows a more frontal cortical distribution, and is probably of different origin.184,185”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [184] source

      The temporal-analysis results (p. 5) place slow spindles at the transition into the SO down-state and show their strongest modulation in frontal channels. The Discussion (p. 8) describes a frontal cortical maximum and points toward separate generating mechanisms. However, the paper identifies these slow spindles as 9–12 Hz (Spindles, p. 2), not 7–12 Hz. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [185] source

      The Introduction describes slow spindles as strongest over frontal cortex and suggests distinct generating mechanisms; the Discussion reports their temporal association with the downward negative phase of the slow oscillation. However, this paper specifies slow spindles as 9–12 Hz in the Introduction or 8–12 Hz in the Methods, not 7–12 Hz, and does not pinpoint their occurrence to the up-to-downstate transition. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Slow waves reflect alternations between synchronized membrane hyperpolarization (downstate) and depolarization (upstate) in neocortical networks, often travel from anterior to posterior cortical regions, and reach the hippocampus and brainstem, including the locus coeruleus.

    “Slow waves reflect alternations between synchronized membrane hyperpolarization (downstate) and depolarization (upstate) in neocortical networks, often travel from anterior to posterior cortical regions, and also reach the hippocampus and brainstem, including the locus coeruleus (LC).[168][169][170]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [168] source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [169] source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [170] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In that study, encoding was indicated by a decrease in 6-20 Hz alpha/beta EEG activity, and topographical overlap between this decrease and spindle power during post-learning sleep predicted later retrieval performance.

    “Encoding of the task, in this study, was indicated by a decrease in 6-20 Hz alpha/beta EEG activity, and the topographical overlap between this decrease and spindle power during post-learning sleep predicted later retrieval performance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [182] source

      The Results (‘EEG results: Spindle amplitude tracks encoding patterns’; page unavailable) report a 6–20 Hz alpha/beta power decrease during encoding and find that its topographical overlap with post-learning sleep spindles relates to sequence retention at post-sleep retrieval. The measured spindle feature was amplitude, not spindle power, and the behavioral measure was change from pre- to post-sleep retrieval rather than later retrieval performance alone. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Gamma band (>40 Hz) activity is an indicator of memory processing in local networks and occurs phase-locked to the spindle oscillation.

    “Gamma band (>40 Hz) activity is an indicator of memory processing in local networks and occurs phase-locked to the spindle oscillation.183”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In human intracranial EEG, gamma band activity revealed robust evidence for wake and sleep memory reactivations of previously learned pictures of houses and landscapes, but only reactivations triggered by hippocampal ripples in non-REM sleep were predictive of memory performance.

    “Likewise, similarity analyses on human intracranial EEG gamma band activity revealed robust evidence for wake and sleep memory reactivations of previously learned pictures of houses and landscapes, 112 but only reactivations triggered by hippocampal ripples in non-REM sleep were predictive of memory performance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [112] 112. Helfrich, R.F., Lendner, J.D., Mander, B.A., Guillen, H., Paff, M., Mnatsa- kanyan, L., Vadera, S., Walker, M.P., Lin, J.J., and Knight, R.T. (2019). Bidirectional prefrontal-hippocampal dynamics organize information transfer during sleep in humans. Nat. Commun. 10, 3572. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41467-019-11444-x. 187. source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Spindles co-occur with SOs, with the depolarizing SO upstate driving thalamic generation of spindles.

    “Spindles co-occur with SOs, with the depolarizing SO upstate driving the thalamic generation of spindles.4,114,176”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [4] 4. Klinzing, J.G., Niethard, N., and Born, J. (2019). Mechanisms of systems memory consolidation during sleep. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 1598-1610. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-019-0467-3. source
    • cites [114] 114. Khodagholy, D., Gelinas, J.N., and Buzsa ´ki, G. (2017). Learning- enhanced coupling between ripple oscillations in association cortices and hippocampus. Science 358, 369-372. 192. source

      The passage labeled Abstract (no page supplied) links cortical ripples to slow-oscillation down-to-up transitions and separately links ripples to spindles. It does not say that spindles co-occur with slow oscillations or that an SO upstate drives thalamic spindle generation. Searches for those relationships found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.70)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [176] source

      The introduction states that thalamic neurons generate spindles, and the paper describes depolarizing components of the slow cortical oscillation. But the section “Slow oscillations made by repetitive IPSPs” reports a slow oscillation for which spindles were not apparent; it does not show that the depolarizing upstate drives thalamic spindle generation. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Work by Kim and colleagues points to opposing roles of SOs and delta waves, with only SOs enhancing consolidation.

    “Work by Kim and colleagues 178 points to opposing roles with only the SOs enhancing consolidation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Sleep replay may be more effective in systems consolidation processes (reorganization of representations across hippocampal-neocortical networks) than wake replay, while replay in both states may support stabilization of memories.

    “While replay in both states may support stabilization of memories, sleep replay may be more effective in systems consolidation processes, i.e., when it comes to a reorganization of representations across hippocampal-neocortical networks.158”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [158] source

      The Abstract describes replay as a possible means of transmitting information from the hippocampus to the neocortex. The Discussion reports similar phase coding across waking and rest, but does not assess memory stabilization or whether sleep replay is more effective than wake replay for systems consolidation. Searches for those comparisons found no supporting passage in our copy (no page numbers provided). (LLM, conf=0.77)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In naturally sleeping mice, spindles nesting into a SO upstate are characterized by a unique constellation of cortical microcircuit activity: inhibition by somatostatin-positive cells is released from dendrites of pyramidal cells that display strongly increased calcium activity, whereas effective somatic inhibition of pyramidal cells prevails when spindles occur without a SO.

    “In vivo calcium imaging in naturally sleeping mice revealed that spindles, which nest into a SO upstate are characterized by a unique constellation of activity in cortical microcircuits, where inhibition (by somatostatin positive cells) is released from the dendrites of pyramidal cells that themselves display strongly increased calcium activity, whereas an effective somatic inhibition of the pyram”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [161] source
    • cites [173] source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [187] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The synaptic homeostasis hypothesis (SHY) by Tononi and Cirelli comprehensively elaborates the view that sleep primarily serves downregulation of synaptic connectivity.

    “This view has been comprehensively elaborated in the ''synaptic homeostasis hypothesis'' (SHY) by Tononi and Cirelli [223][224][225] (Figure 2B).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [223] source
    • cites [224] source
    • cites [225] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Hippocampal ripples often precede SO downstates by 200-130 ms, and electrical stimulation of cortical networks time-locked upon occurrence of hippocampal ripples induced SO in prefrontal cortex with spindles nesting in their upstates.

    “Hippocampal ripples often precede SO downstates by 200-130 ms, 199 and electrical stimulation of cortical networks time-locked upon the occurrence of hippocampal ripples induced SO in prefrontal cortex with spindles nesting in their upstates.200”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [199] source

      Citation 200 attaches to the electrical-stimulation clause, not the preceding timing claim. The Figure 8 discussion reports that hippocampal ripples were followed by more SO downstates, especially in prefrontal cortex, but the paper describes recordings under natural conditions, not ripple-triggered electrical stimulation inducing SOs with spindles nested in their upstates. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [200] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Once motor performance stabilized, rats exhibited a sharp increase in SO coupling between prefrontal and primary motor cortical areas, accompanied by a drop in coupling of hippocampal ripples to SOs in primary motor cortex.

    “Interestingly, once motor performance stabilized, the rats consistently exhibited a sharp increase in SO coupling between prefrontal and primary motor cortical areas which was accompanied by a drop in the coupling of hippocampal ripples to SOs in primary motor cortex.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Intracranial recordings in human patients and rodents confirmed a triple coupling of oscillations with hippocampal ripples nesting in troughs of spindle oscillation, and spindles nesting in upstates of SOs.

    “Indeed, intracranial recordings in human patients and rodents confirmed a triple coupling of oscillations with hippocampal ripples nesting in the troughs of the spindle oscillation, and spindles nesting in the upstates of SOs.58,196,197”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [58] 58. Latchoumane, C.V., Ngo, H.V., Born, J., and Shin, H.S. (2017). Thalamic spindles promote memory formation during sleep through triple phase- locking of cortical, thalamic, and hippocampal rhythms. Neuron 95, 424-435.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.025. source
    • cites [196] source
    • cites [197] source

      The Results (Event contingencies) and Discussion report hierarchical SO–spindle–ripple coupling in the human hippocampus: spindles are modulated by SOs, and ripples nest in spindle troughs. The study used intracranial recordings from human epilepsy patients, not rodents; its Discussion says prior rodent studies did not establish this three-way hippocampal coupling. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The occurrence of spindles during non-REM sleep fluctuates with an infra slow rhythm of 0.02 Hz, and recent research indicates this rhythm possibly reflects modulation via LC-NA activity.

    “Interestingly, the occurrence of spindles during non-REM sleep fluctuates with an infra slow rhythm of 0.02 Hz 203 and recent research indicates that this rhythm possibly reflects a modulation via LC-NA activity.204,205”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Phasic REMs go along with selective suppression of informative external inputs and with coordinate activation of thalamic head direction cells matching the direction of the phasic REMs.

    “Phasic REMs go along with a selective suppression of informative external inputs 218 and with a coordinate activation of thalamic head direction cells matching the direction of the phasic REMs.219”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Spine-surface expression of GluA1 and average spine size, but not spine density, increased after training, and this increase was globally reduced during subsequent sleep, but not when animals remained awake in the post-training interval.

    “Spine-surface expression of GluA1 as well as average spine size, but not spine density, increased after training, and this increase was globally reduced during subsequent sleep, but not when the animals remained awake in the post-training interval.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [165] source

      The Results report that mean spine-surface GluA1 decreased after post-training sleep but not after sleep deprivation; the Discussion says GluA1 increased after learning while spine density did not change. The Discussion also says GluA1 changes correlated with changes in spine size, but our copy does not establish that average spine size followed the same increase-and-sleep-only-decrease pattern. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    REM sleep active hypothalamic MCH neurons produced forgetting of hippocampal memory possibly by increasing inhibition of hippocampal pyramidal cell firing, whereas another study identified a subgroup of REM sleep active MCH neurons specifically projecting to hippocampal CA2 region, which enhanced consolidation of social memories.

    “REM sleep active hypothalamic MCH neurons produced forgetting of hippocampal memory possibly by increasing inhibition of hippocampal pyramidal cell firing, 222 whereas another study identified a subgroup of REM sleep active MCH neurons specifically projecting to the hippocampal CA2 region, which enhanced consolidation of social memories.72”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [222] source
    • cites [72] 72. Qin, H., Fu, L., Jian, T., Jin, W., Liang, M., Li, J., Chen, Q., Yang, X., Du, H., Liao, X., et al. (2022). REM sleep-active hypothalamic neurons may contribute to hippocampal social-memory consolidation. Neuron 110, 4000-4014.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2022.09.004. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Memory performance was impaired after blocking hippocampal ripples and enhanced when spontaneously occurring ripples were prolonged by closed-loop optogenetic stimulation.

    “Memory performance was impaired after blocking hippocampal ripples 84,132 and enhanced when spontaneously occurring ripples were prolonged by closed-loop optogenetic stimulation.193”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [84] 84. Girardeau, G., Benchenane, K., Wiener, S.I., Buzsa ´ki, G., and Zugaro, M.B. (2009). Selective suppression of hippocampal ripples impairs spatial mem- ory. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 1222-1223. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2384. source
    • cites [132] 132. Contreras, M.P., Fechner, J., Born, J., and Inostroza, M. (2023). Acceler- ating maturation of spatial memory systems by experience -evidence from sleep oscillation signatures of memory processing. J. Neurosci. JN-RM-1967-22. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1967-22.2023. 279. Kelemen, E., Bahrendt, M., Born, J., and Inostroza, M. (2014). Hippocam- pal corticosterone impairs memory consolidation during sleep but im- proves consolidation in the wake state. Hippocampus 24, 510-515. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.22266. 280. Wilhelm, I., Wagner, U., and Born, J. (2011b). Opposite effects of c source
    • cites [193] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    There is evidence that one major function of sleep during brain development is to promote experience-driven neural plasticity, and it is likely that experience-driven memory formation contributes to gradually shaping sleep during development.

    “Indeed, there is evidence that one major function of sleep during brain development is to promote experience-driven neural plasticity (e.g., Wilhelm et al. 243 and Blumberg et al. 244 ), and it is likely that, conversely, such experience-driven memory formation contributes to gradually shaping the brain state of sleep during development.245,246”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [243] source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [244] source
    • cites [245] source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Offline place cell activity associated with SPW-Rs in rat pups before weaning reflected predominantly stationary locations in recently visited environments, whereas coordinate sequential replay of place cell ensemble firing patterns emerged only gradually after weaning.

    “Offline place cell activity associated with SPW-Rs observed in rat pups before weaning (at postnatal day [PD] 21) reflected predominantly stationary locations in recently visited environments, whereas coordinate sequential replay of place cell ensemble firing patterns that encoded extended trajectories through space during exploration, emerged only gradually after weaning.255”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    SO activity during the first 1.5 years of life dominates over occipital cortical regions, whereas in adults it dominates over frontal cortical regions.

    “For example, SO activity during the first 1.5 years of life dominates over occipital cortical regions, whereas in adults it dominates over frontal cortical regions.254”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [254] source

      The Conclusions (page unavailable) say that sleep slow waves originate mostly in frontal cortex in adults, supporting the adult comparison. For young children, however, they identify centro-parietal—not occipital—origins, and do not establish the claim for the first 1.5 years of life. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    The inverted U-shaped trajectory of slow oscillatory activity presumably reflects parallel changes in cortical synaptic connectivity and white matter microstructure.

    “which presumably reflects parallel changes in cortical synaptic connectivity and white matter microstructure.253”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [253] source

      The Introduction (p. 3) says slow-wave activity peaks in childhood and declines through adolescence, and links slow waves to synaptic connectivity. It also links slow-wave propagation parameters to white matter microstructure, but does not say that the inverted U-shaped trajectory of slow-wave activity reflects parallel changes in white matter microstructure. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Wide field imaging confirmed this pattern across dorsal cortex, although specific subgroups of excitatory cells (e.g., Thy-1 positive cells) increased activity during REM sleep particularly in retrosplenial and visual cortex.

    “Wide field imaging experiments using CaMKII as a marker for excitatory pyramidal cells confirmed this pattern across the dorsal cortex 167 although specific subgroups of excitatory cells (e.g., Thy-1 positive cells), contrary to the global decrease, have been found to increase activity during REM sleep particularly in retrosplenial and visual cortex.236,237”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [167] source
    • cites [236] source
    • cites [237] source
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The findings overall point to a compartmentalized response in regulation of synaptic scaling during sleep, with both synaptic strengthening and weakening occurring within the same cell during SWS and REM sleep, possibly depending on synapse size, AMPA receptor densities, and immediate early gene levels.

    “Interestingly, beyond evidencing the co-occurrence of differential synaptic scaling during sleep at global and local levels, the findings overall point to a compartmentalized response in this regulation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [163] source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [165] source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [228] source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    A sleep-induced shift toward preferential strengthening of more distal synapses in layer 1 could explain formation of more generalized memories and their integration into pre-existing schemas during sleep.

    “A sleep-induced shift toward preferential strengthening of more distal synapses in layer 1 could thus explain the formation of more generalized memories and their integration into pre-existing schemas during sleep.242”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [242] source

      The News & Views discussion (page unavailable) describes selective spine strengthening during REM sleep and sleep-related performance gains. It does not describe preferential strengthening of distal synapses in layer 1 or connect that mechanism to generalized memories and their integration into pre-existing schemas. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Sleep spindles go along with reduced inhibition of dendrites of cortical pyramidal cells, enabling increased dendritic calcium influx, while soma of these cells is subjected to increased inhibition by parvalbumin-positive interneurons.

    “Sleep spindles go along with reduced inhibition of the dendrites of cortical pyramidal cells thus enabling increased dendritic calcium influx while at the same time the soma of these cells is subjected to an increased inhibition by parvalbumin-positive interneurons.161,240”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [161] source
    • cites [240] source

      The Discussion reports increased, synchronised dendritic calcium activity during spindle-rich sleep and proposes perisomatic inhibition as an explanation for the difference between dendritic and somatic activity. It explicitly says the study did not investigate inhibition, however; our copy does not establish reduced dendritic inhibition or identify parvalbumin-positive interneurons as the source of somatic inhibition. Page numbers were not supplied. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The delayed occurrence of sequence replay during sleep in the presence of SPW-Rs, as well as prior encoding during wake theta activity, parallels the protracted trajectory for hippocampus-dependent episodic memory and could partly reflect late postnatal maturation in excitatory synaptic plasticity in hippocampal networks.

    “The rather delayed occurrence of both sequence replay during sleep in the presence of SPW-Rs, as well as the prior encoding of these sequences during ongoing wake theta activity, parallels the protracted trajectory for the formation of hippocampus-dependent episodic memory, and could partly reflect the late postnatal maturation in excitatory synaptic plasticity in hippocampal networks.255”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [255] source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In the rodent hippocampus, at the end of the first postnatal week, sharp wave bursts can be detected, while SPW-Rs in conjunction with neuronal reactivations only emerge at the end of the second postnatal week.

    “In the rodent hippocampus, at the end of the first postnatal week, ''sharp wave bursts,'' as a first organized network event can be detected, while SPW-Rs in conjunction with neuronal reactivations only emerge at the end of the second postnatal week.255,256”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [255] source

      The Results and Discussion (page not specified) report sharp-wave ripples accompanied by reactivation in rats from P17, the earliest age tested. The paper does not establish when those events first emerge or document sharp-wave bursts at the end of the first postnatal week, so it does not support the claimed developmental timeline. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [256] source

      The paper’s account of awake rest and sleep reports location-depicting neuronal activity at P15–P16, and says spatial experience–depicting frames co-occurred with ripple oscillations (Fig. 3–4 passages; page unavailable). Its recordings began at P15, however, so it does not establish when sharp-wave bursts first appear in postnatal week one or that SPW-Rs with neuronal reactivation first emerge at the end of week two. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Overall pyramidal cell activity decreased across both REM sleep and SWS epochs, accompanied by a global increase in parvalbumin-positive interneurons during SWS epochs.

    “Consistent with a global increase in inhibition, overall pyramidal cell activity decreased across both REM sleep and SWS epochs, accompanied by a global increase in parvalbumin-positive interneurons during SWS epochs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Preliminary findings suggest that ripple activity as well as ripples co-occurring with spindles decrease during early development.

    “Preliminary findings suggest that ripple activity as well as ripples co-occurring with spindles decrease during early development.275”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The hippocampal-neocortical dialog underlying sleep-dependent systems consolidation is mediated through a triple coupling between hippocampal ripples, spindles, and neocortical SO.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Trajectories of spindle density peaking during adolescence and spindle amplitude peaking during infancy likely reflect the maturation of thalamocortical brain regions.

    “Trajectories of spindle density peaking during adolescence and spindle amplitude peaking during infancy likely reflect the maturation of thalamocortical brain regions.252,276”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [252] source

      The Results section, “Life-course trajectories of spindle traits” (page unavailable), reports that spindle density peaks around adolescence and says age-related spindle changes are believed to reflect thalamocortical maturation. It does not support an amplitude peak during infancy; it reports amplitude as broadly stable across childhood and adolescence, then declining in adulthood. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [276] source

      Section 5.1 links developmental changes in spindles to maturation of frontal gray and white matter and describes changes in spindle occurrence and amplitude. Section 10 likewise says spindle properties change from infancy through adolescence. Neither passage establishes that density peaks during adolescence or amplitude peaks during infancy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Rule memory in 6- to 8-month-old infants was also enhanced after a wake control period, although linked to a different pattern of ERP responses suggesting rule memories formed during sleep and wake differ in quality.

    “However, such rule memory was also found to be enhanced after a wake control period, although linked to a different pattern of ERP responses suggesting that rule memories formed during sleep and wake at this age differ in quality.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [271] source

      The Results (no page supplied) report rule-memory ERP effects after both the wake and nap periods, with different mid-latency responses. The Discussion interprets these as differences in the nature of the memories. However, it describes the wake group as retaining representations formed during encoding, not as having enhanced memory after wakefulness. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Memory processing and consolidation in the developing brain might be organized in a more parallel manner at the hippocampal and neocortical level, which, with generally increased plasticity especially during REM sleep, might produce stronger transformations at the neocortical level.

    “Instead, memory processing and consolidation in the developing brain might be organized in a more parallel manner at the hippocampal and neocortical level which, in conjunction with a generally increased plasticity especially during REM sleep 231,249 might produce stronger transformations at the neocortical level.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [231] source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [249] source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Using fMRI during sleep in 2-year-old toddlers, signs of reactivations in the hippocampus to previously learned songs were observed and were associated with improved memory for the context in which the song had been encoded.

    “Using fMRI during sleep in 2-year-old toddlers, Ghetti and coworkers 272 observed signs of reactivations in the hippocampus to previously learned songs which were associated with an improved memory for the context in which the song had been encoded.272,273”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [272] source

      The Study overview describes sleep fMRI in 2-year-olds using previously learned songs, and the Discussion reports an association between song-related hippocampal activation and temporal-order memory. It explicitly says spatial memory was not significantly correlated with that activation. The Introduction reports a prior study linking hippocampal activation to memory for the room where a song was heard, but that contextual finding was not this paper’s result (page numbers unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [273] source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) reports that an earlier fMRI study found hippocampal activation during sleep for learned songs in 28-month-olds, associated with memory for events linked to those songs. But this paper’s own study, described in the Discussion (page unavailable), tested newly learned words and memory for puppet names—not songs or their encoding context. The citing sentence incorrectly presents the reported earlier finding as this paper’s observation. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    After sleep-dependent consolidation, newly stored word-object events are not processed semantically, although appropriate semantic memories were present and accessible by similar events not experienced right before the nap.

    “Interestingly, the ERP pattern at test indicated that after sleep-dependent consolidation, the newly stored word-object events are not processed semantically, although appropriate semantic memories were present and accessible by similar events that were not experienced right before the nap.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In humans, the coupling strength of spindles to the SO upstate increased across childhood and adolescence, along with an increased capability to retain memory for word pairs across sleep.

    “In humans, the coupling strength of spindles to the SO upstate (i.e., how precisely an individual's spindles across events nest into a specific phase of the SO upstate), increased across childhood and adolescence, along with an increased capability to retain memory for word pairs across sleep, 60”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [60] 60. Hahn, M.A., Heib, D., Schabus, M., Hoedlmoser, K., and Helfrich, R.F. (2020). Slow oscillation-spindle coupling predicts enhanced memory for- mation from childhood to adolescence. eLife 9, e53730. https://doi.org/ 10.7554/eLife.53730. source
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The hippocampal-neocortical dialog underlying sleep-dependent systems consolidation is mediated through a triple coupling between hippocampal ripples, spindles, and neocortical SO.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Consolidation during wakefulness for tasks like novel object recognition is not impaired but can be even enhanced when hippocampal activity is disrupted during the post-encoding wake interval.

    “By contrast, consolidation during wakefulness for such tasks is not impaired but can be even enhanced when hippocampal activity is disrupted during the post-encoding wake interval.6”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] 6. Sawangjit, A., Harkotte, M., Oyanedel, C.N., Niethard, N., Born, J., and Inostroza, M. (2022). Two distinct ways to form long-term object recog- nition memory during sleep and wakefulness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119. e2203165119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2203165119. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Glucocorticoids exert opposing effects on consolidation depending on the brain state in humans and rats, increasing consolidation in wakefulness but impairing sleep consolidation.

    “Noteworthy, mediated via hippocampal receptors, glucocorticoids have also been found to exert opposing effects on consolidation depending on the brain state in humans and rats, increasing consolidation in wakefulness but impairing sleep consolidation.279,280”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [279] source

      The paper’s Abstract reports that intrahippocampal corticosterone impaired consolidation during sleep but improved it during wakefulness in rats. Its discussion also reports the same pattern in a human study. However, it describes mediation through hippocampal glucocorticoid receptors as likely, rather than established, so the citing sentence states that mechanism more firmly than this source does. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [280] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    In humans, enhancing effects of post-encoding stress on memory consolidation were only found when the stressor was administered in the same context as during encoding, and in rats detrimental effects of post-encoding stressors on memory prevailed, arguing against the view that stress as an internal state and independent of its external origin modulates wake consolidation.

    “In humans, enhancing effects of post-encoding stress on memory consolidation were only found when the stressor was administered in the same context as during encoding, and in rats detrimental effects of post-encoding stressors on memory prevailed, 282 arguing against the view that stress as an internal state and independent of its external origin modulates wake consolidation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [282] source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Inhibiting the hippocampus during post-encoding wakefulness significantly improved object recognition memory at test, suggesting that hippocampal activity in the wake state interferes with ongoing consolidation.

    “By contrast, inhibiting the hippocampus during post-encoding wakefulness significantly improved object recognition memory at test, suggesting that hippocampal activity in the wake state interferes with ongoing consolidation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] 6. Sawangjit, A., Harkotte, M., Oyanedel, C.N., Niethard, N., Born, J., and Inostroza, M. (2022). Two distinct ways to form long-term object recog- nition memory during sleep and wakefulness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119. e2203165119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2203165119. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    With intervening nocturnal sleep, the activity increase in neocortical areas remained stable for 24 h, was strongly related to memory retention, and was paralleled by microstructural changes indicating neocortical memory storage.

    “With intervening nocturnal sleep, the activity increase in neocortical areas remained stable for 24 h, was strongly related to memory retention, and was paralleled by microstructural changes indicating neocortical memory storage.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [290] source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) describes sleep-related memory reactivation and suggests that memories become stabilized in neocortical networks. The Results section reports improved retention after cues presented during a nap, but our copy does not report a neocortical activity increase stable for 24 hours, its correlation with retention, or parallel microstructural changes. (LLM, conf=0.77)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [291] source
    • cites [292] source

      The Abstract reports that posterior parietal activity remained elevated after 24 hours and that stronger activity related to higher memory-based performance. The Results confirm persistence across two consecutive experimental days. The paper does not report microstructural changes, and the Materials and Methods establish an overnight interval but do not establish what role sleep played. (LLM, conf=0.89)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [293] source

      The Results (‘Stability of the parietal long-term memory representation’; page unavailable) report elevated parietal activity 12 hours after learning and a correlation between precuneus activity and memory performance in the sleep group. They do not establish stability for 24 hours or report microstructural changes indicating neocortical storage. The same section found no significant sleep–wake difference in the parietal activity increase. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Suppressing hippocampal activity in rats during a post-encoding period of wakefulness improved rather than impaired memory consolidation, indicating that spontaneous hippocampal offline inputs during the wake state interfere with, rather than support the formation of stable cortical representations.

    “In fact, suppressing hippocampal activity in rats during a post-encoding period of wakefulness improved rather than impaired memory consolidation, 6 indicating that spontaneous hippocampal offline inputs during the wake state interfere with, rather than support the formation of stable cortical representations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] 6. Sawangjit, A., Harkotte, M., Oyanedel, C.N., Niethard, N., Born, J., and Inostroza, M. (2022). Two distinct ways to form long-term object recog- nition memory during sleep and wakefulness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119. e2203165119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2203165119. source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Representations with some stability can be formed during wakefulness in the neocortex within one session, suggesting a rapid type of systems consolidation.

    “Thus, representations with some stability can be formed during wakefulness in the neocortex within one session, suggesting a rapid type of systems consolidation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [290] source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) discusses stabilization in neocortical networks over time in the context of sleep-related memory consolidation. The Methods describe learning before a nap, but do not establish stable neocortical representations formed during wakefulness within one session. Searches for rapid systems consolidation and wake-formed neocortical representations found no passage addressing that claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [291] source
    • cites [292] source
    • cites [293] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Sleep was required for forming a long-term food-odor conditioning memory only in fed animals, and these animals displayed increased sleep after conditioning.

    “Sleep was required for forming a long-term food-odor conditioning memory only in the fed animals, and these animals indeed also displayed increased sleep after conditioning.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] 7. Chouhan, N.S., Griffith, L.C., Haynes, P., and Sehgal, A. (2021). Availabil- ity of food determines the need for sleep in memory consolidation. Nature 589, 582-585. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2997-y. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Both hunger-dependent and sleep-dependent long-term memories involved distinct neuronal circuits in the mushroom bodies, i.e., the anterior-posterior a0/b0 neurons in fed conditions, and the medial a0/b0 neurons in starved conditions.

    “Both hunger-dependent and sleep-dependent long-term memories involved distinct neuronal circuits in the mushroom bodies, i.e., the anterior-posterior a 0 /b 0 neurons in fed conditions, and the medial a 0 /b 0 neurons in starved conditions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] 7. Chouhan, N.S., Griffith, L.C., Haynes, P., and Sehgal, A. (2021). Availabil- ity of food determines the need for sleep in memory consolidation. Nature 589, 582-585. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2997-y. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In hippocampal slice preparations, low glucocorticoid concentrations increased rates of SPW-Rs typically accompanying memory replay whereas high glucocorticoid concentration suppressed SPW-Rs.

    “In hippocampal slice preparations, low glucocorticoid concentrations increased rates of SPW-Rs typically accompanying memory replay whereas high glucocorticoid concentration suppressed SPW-Rs, 281”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [281] source

      The Results report that low-dose corticosterone increased sharp-wave occurrence in mouse hippocampal slices, while high-dose corticosterone reduced it. The claim generalizes this pattern to glucocorticoids, but the same Results section says high-dose cortisol had no effect on sharp-wave frequency. The measured change was in the occurrence of sharp waves, not the frequency of oscillations within ripples. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Disturbing wake replay activity impairs memory formation, indicating that neuronal reactivations of newly formed representations represent a common core process for consolidation during sleep and wakefulness.

    “Disturbing such wake replay activity has also been found to impair memory formation, 284,285 indicating that neuronal reactivations of newly formed representations represent a common core process for consolidation during sleep and wakefulness.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [284] source

      The Introduction reports that disrupting awake sharp-wave ripples can impair behavioral performance and that interfering with them during sleep can worsen memory performance. This study found that silencing neurons during awake ripples destabilized place-cell spatial representations, but its Results report no difference in measured memory performance between ripple-locked and delayed stimulation. It therefore supports a role for awake ripple activity in maintaining newly learned representations, not the stronger conclusion that this experiment demonstrated impaired memory formation or established one common consolidation process across sleep and wakefulness. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [285] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Optogenetically induced spindles synchronized hippocampal ripples to spindle troughs independently of whether spindles were induced during a SO upstate or downstate, indicating a direct effect of thalamic spindles on timing of hippocampal ripples and associated memory replay.

    “Optogenetically induced spindles synchronized hippocampal ripples to the spindle troughs independently of whether spindles were induced during a SO upstate or downstate 58 indicating a direct effect of thalamic spindles on the timing of hippocampal ripples and associated memory replay.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [58] 58. Latchoumane, C.V., Ngo, H.V., Born, J., and Shin, H.S. (2017). Thalamic spindles promote memory formation during sleep through triple phase- locking of cortical, thalamic, and hippocampal rhythms. Neuron 95, 424-435.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.025. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    In humans, triple coupling is most consistent at central and parietal electrodes but appears to spare SO-spindle complexes identified over frontal cortical regions.

    “In humans, this triple coupling is most consistent at central and parietal electrodes but appears to spare SO-spindle complexes identified over frontal cortical regions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Ripple-triggered stimulation enhanced the rate of joint occurrence of SOs, spindles and ripples and also the consolidation of object-location memories encoded prior to sleep.

    “Indeed, ripple-triggered stimulation in this study not only enhanced the rate of joint occurrence of SOs, spindles and ripples but also the consolidation of object-location memories encoded prior to sleep.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [200] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Human infants during the first 3 months of life do not exhibit clearly separable periods of SWS and REM sleep; the precursor states are quiet and active sleep.

    “Human infants, during the first 3 months of life do not exhibit clearly separable periods of SWS and REM sleep, with the precursor states termed quiet and active sleep, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [247] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Inhibition globally increased within 4 h of sleep while synaptic excitation decreased.

    “Indeed, inhibition globally increased within 4 h of sleep while synaptic excitation decreased.167”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [167] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    A similar somato-dendritic decoupling of pyramidal cell regulation was revealed during REM sleep, where optogenetic inhibition of dendritic activity impaired formation of associative memory, whereas inhibition of soma improved memory.

    “A similar somato-dendritic decoupling of pyramidal cell regulation was revealed during REM sleep, where the optogenetic inhibition of dendritic activity (by stimulating vasoactive intestinal peptide positive interneurons) impaired formation of associative memory, whereas inhibition of the soma (by stimulating parvalbumin-positive interneurons) improved memory.235”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [235] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Disrupting hippocampal activity during post-encoding sleep in rats impairs long-term memory not only on hippocampus-dependent spatial tasks but also on tasks like novel object recognition which can be encoded and retrieved in the absence of hippocampal function.

    “Disrupting hippocampal activity during post-encoding sleep in rats impairs long-term memory not only on hippocampus-dependent spatial tasks but also on tasks like novel object recognition which can be encoded and retrieved in the absence of hippocampal function.66”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [66] 66. Sawangjit, A., Oyanedel, C.N., Niethard, N., Salazar, C., Born, J., and In- ostroza, M. (2018). The hippocampus is crucial for forming non-hippo- campal long-term memory during sleep. Nature 564, 109-113. https:// doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0716-8. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In parallel, the pups displayed an increased percentage of hippocampal ripples coupled to parietal SO-spindle complexes, and a stronger ripple-spindle phase-locking during the post-encoding period of retention sleep.

    “In parallel, the pups displayed an increased percentage of hippocampal ripples coupled to parietal SO-spindle complexes, and a stronger ripple-spindle phase-locking during the post-encoding period of retention sleep.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [278] source
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The hippocampal-neocortical dialog underlying sleep-dependent systems consolidation is mediated through a triple coupling between hippocampal ripples, spindles, and neocortical SO.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    MEG recordings indicated involvement of hippocampal and parahippocampal regions at learning, whereas sleep-dependent consolidation of object-function associations in children was associated with marked changes in prefrontal cortex activity at recall testing.

    “Magnetoencephalographic recordings indicated an involvement of hippocampal and parahippocampal regions at learning, whereas the sleep-dependent consolidation of the object-function associations in the children was associated with marked changes in prefrontal cortex activity at recall testing.265”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [265] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Emotional stimuli are already more strongly encoded than neutral stimuli, and encoding strength confounds consolidating effects of sleep.

    “emotional stimuli are already more strongly encoded than neutral stimuli, with encoding strength well known to confound consolidating effects of sleep”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Denis et al. 28

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Neuronal replay typically occurs in a temporally compressed fashion and can recapitulate the original event sequence in forward or reverse order.

    “Neuronal replay typically occurs in a temporally compressed fashion and can recapitulate the original event sequence in forward or reverse order.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [80] 80. Diba, K., and Buzsa ´ki, G. (2007). Forward and reverse hippocampal place-cell sequences during ripples. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 1241-1242. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1961. source
    • cites [81] 81. Foster, D.J., and Wilson, M.A. (2006). Reverse replay of behavioural se- quences in hippocampal place cells during the awake state. Nature 440, 680-683. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04587. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Research overall confirmed an enhancing effect of post-encoding sleep and sleep-like states on memory for all species examined, including rodents, drosophilae, honey bees, snails, and may hold for worms.

    “such research overall confirmed an enhancing effect of post-encoding sleep and sleep-like states on memory for all species examined in this regard, including not only rodents and drosophilae, but also honey bees, snails, and may even hold for worms like C. elegans.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [62] 62. Vorster, A.P., and Born, J. (2015). Sleep and memory in mammals, birds and invertebrates. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 50, 103-119. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.020. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Evidence for category-specific reactivations was strongest when cue delivery was accompanied by increased spindle activity and predicted the TMR-induced gain in memory.

    “Evidence for category-specific reactivations was strongest when cue delivery was accompanied by increased spindle activity and, moreover, predicted the TMR-induced gain in memory.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [117] 117. Aston-Jones, G., and Bloom, F.E. (1981). Activity of norepinephrine-con- taining locus coeruleus neurons in behaving rats anticipates fluctuations in the sleep-waking cycle. J. Neurosci. 1, 876-886. https://doi.org/10. 1523/JNEUROSCI.01-08-00876.1981. 207. Berridge, C.W. (2008). Noradrenergic modulation of arousal. Brain Res. Rev. 58, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.10.013. 208. Rodenkirch, C., Liu, Y., Schriver, B.J., and Wang, Q. (2019). Locus coeru- leus activation enhances thalamic feature selectivity via norepinephrine regulation of intrathalamic circuit dynamics. Na source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The predominance of replay in the beginning of post-encoding sleep might reflect the importance of this period for initializing systems consolidation processes during sleep.

    “The predominance of replay in the beginning of post-encoding sleep might rather reflect the importance of this period for initializing systems consolidation processes during sleep”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    SWS is dominated by slow EEG activity in the 0.1-4 Hz range, comprising SOs (<1 Hz) and delta frequencies (1-4 Hz).

    “SWS is dominated by slow EEG activity in the 0.1-4 Hz range, with this SWA comprising the SOs (<1 Hz) and delta frequencies (1-4 Hz, frequency bands refer to human EEG).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    During REM sleep, information flow appears to be mainly determined by theta oscillations, aside from PGO waves.

    “During REM sleep, information flow appears to be mainly determined by theta oscillations, aside from PGO waves.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Slower frequency oscillations typically synchronize neuronal excitability at a more global level than fast frequency oscillations, with nesting of fast into slow oscillations reflecting global-to-local network interaction and fine-tuning.

    “Oscillations of slower frequency typically synchronize neuronal excitability at a more global level than fast frequency oscillations that regulate excitability at a more local level, with the nesting of fast frequency into slow frequency oscillations reflecting the global-to-local network interaction and fine-tuning in this regulation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Sleep replay serves a special function in memory consolidation, although sleep and wake replay both display largely similar features.

    “Collectively, these findings support the view that sleep replay serves a special function in memory consolidation, although sleep and wake replay both display largely similar features.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    PGOs preceding phasic REMs might initiate memory reactivations accompanying these phasic REMs.

    “Thus, PGOs preceding phasic REMs might initiate memory reactivations accompanying these phasic REMs.162”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [162] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    PGO waves typically precede the onset of phasic REMs by 25 ms (but sometimes also occur during non-REM sleep especially during transition into REM sleep).

    “PGO waves typically precede the onset of phasic REMs by 25 ms 220 (but sometimes also occur during non-REM sleep especially during the transition into REM sleep).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [220] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Spindles reaching hippocampal networks synchronize ripples and associated memory replay activity to the excitable troughs of the spindle, facilitating direct transmission of reactivated hippocampal memory information back to the neocortex.

    “Thereby, spindles reaching hippocampal networks synchronize ripples and associated memory replay activity to the excitable troughs of the spindle, as a mechanism that, in turn, facilitates the direct transmission of the reactivated hippocampal memory information back to the neocortex.195,198”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [195] source
    • cites [198] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Overall, the findings support a scenario where cortical SOs provide a globally acting top-down signal that sets the temporal frame for parallel facilitation of thalamic spindles and, depending on task and training phase, also hippocampal ripples during the subsequent depolarizing SO upstate.

    “Overall, the findings support a scenario where cortical SOs provide a globally acting top-down signal that sets the temporal frame for the parallel facilitation of thalamic spindles and, depending on task and training phase, also of hippocampal ripples during the subsequent depolarizing SO upstate.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    The concept of sleep generally downscaling and re-normalizing synaptic connectivity and network excitability conflicts with the idea that sleep enhances consolidation of specific memories, which should manifest as relatively enhanced synaptic connectivity and excitability of memory-representing neuron ensembles.

    “Importantly, the concept of sleep generally downscaling and re-normalizing synaptic connectivity and network excitability conflicts with the idea that sleep enhances the consolidation of specific memories which, in theory, should manifest as a relatively enhanced synaptic connectivity and excitability of the memory representing neuron ensembles.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    At the same time, there is a much greater need to form long-term memory and accumulate knowledge over time.

    “At the same time, there is a much greater need to form long-term memory and to accumulate knowledge over time.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Assuming a dendritic-branch-specific representation of memory, local synaptic scaling processes during sleep may contribute to reorganization of memories by changing topographical distribution of synapses along dendritic tree.

    “Assuming a dendritic-branch-specific representation of memory, local synaptic scaling processes during sleep may well contribute to the reorganization of these memories by changing the topographical distribution of synapses along the dendritic tree.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Memory is represented in a dendritic-branch-specific manner.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Subsequent periods of REM sleep may primarily support global downregulation of synaptic connectivity sparing those synapses strengthened during prior SWS.

    “Subsequent periods of REM sleep may primarily support the global downregulation of synaptic connectivity sparing those synapses that were strengthened during prior SWS.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Assuming that formation of long-term memory and underlying active systems consolidation represents a major function of sleep, one would expect early development of sleep to proceed tightly interlinked with that of relevant memory systems.

    “Assuming that the formation of longterm memory, and the putatively underlying machinery of an active systems consolidation process, represents a major function of sleep, one would expect that the early development of the brain state of sleep proceeds tightly interlinked with that of the relevant memory systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The formation of long-term memory, and the putatively underlying machinery of an active systems consolidation process, represents a major function of sleep.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    During infancy and childhood, humans and rodents spend much more time asleep than in adulthood.

    “During infancy and childhood, humans, as well as rodents, spend much more time asleep than in adulthood.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    A tentative scenario: during SWS, hippocampal ripples drive replay of ensemble firing patterns producing synaptic downscaling in hippocampal networks.

    “A tentative scenario could be as follows: during SWS, hippocampal ripples drive the replay of ensemble firing patterns producing synaptic downscaling in hippocampal networks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    At the same time, spindles coupling with hippocampal ripples time cortical reactivations thereby fostering memory-specific synaptic plasticity in cortical networks.

    “At the same time, spindles coupling with hippocampal ripples time cortical reactivations thereby fostering memoryspecific synaptic plasticity in cortical networks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    While sleep is well known to support long-term memory formation in adults, the memory function of sleep during early development is by far less well investigated.

    “While sleep is well known to support long-term memory formation in adults, the memory function of sleep during early development is by far less well investigated.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Other studies suggest that synaptic scaling during sleep varies between SWS and REM sleep.

    “Whereas Miyamoto et al. 165 did not discriminate sleep stages, other studies suggest that synaptic scaling during sleep varies between SWS and REM sleep.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Ripples drive replay of newly encoded representations in hippocampal circuits and its spreading to multiple extrahippocampal areas.

    “One candidate here are ripples, which drive the replay of newly encoded representations in hippocampal circuits and its spreading to multiple extrahippocampal areas.238”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [238] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Findings are consistent with the idea that experience during development drives the maturation of the episodic memory system in general, by enhancing cortico-hippocampal information exchange, in parallel with the formation of individual integrated knowledge representations during sleep.

    “The findings are consistent with the idea that experience during development drives the maturation of the episodic memory system in general, by enhancing cortico-hippocampal information exchange, in parallel with the formation of individual integrated knowledge representations during sleep.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [278] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    There are findings indicating only weak or even absent benefit from sleep for episodic or spatial aspects in memory, suggesting additional factors modulate sleep-dependent memory benefits.

    “However, there are also findings indicating an only weak or even absent benefit from sleep for episodic or spatial aspects in memory, 261 suggesting that there are additional factors modulating sleepdependent memory benefits.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [261] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Overall, studies indicate that sleep in infants supports consolidation of episodic memory as well as formation of more abstracted generalized semantic-like memory, and both kinds of consolidation processes are established in parallel during sleep.

    “Overall, these studies indicate that sleep in infants supports the consolidation of episodic memory as well as the formation of more abstracted generalized semantic-like memory and that both kinds of consolidation processes are established in parallel during sleep.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The underlying hippocampal and neocortical networks, particularly the medial prefrontal cortex as a hub, are rather immature during early development, as is the coupling of SO, spindles and ripples assumed to mediate the dialog between hippocampus and neocortex during systems consolidation.

    “In stark contrast, the underlying hippocampal and neocortical networks, particularly in the medial prefrontal cortex as a hub in this system, are rather immature, as is also the coupling of SO, spindles and ripples assumed to mediate the dialog between hippocampus and neocortex during systems consolidation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The hippocampal-neocortical dialog underlying sleep-dependent systems consolidation is mediated through a triple coupling between hippocampal ripples, spindles, and neocortical SO.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Although the body of experimental evidence indicates a benefit of sleep in comparison with a post-encoding period of wakefulness, an increasing number of studies failed to reveal such benefit, suggesting that consolidation of long-term memory is not a unique function of sleep but also occurs in the wake state.

    “Although the body of experimental evidence indicates a benefit of sleep in comparison with a post-encoding period of wakeful-ness, there is an increasing number of studies that failed to reveal such benefit, suggesting that the consolidation of long-term memory is not a unique function of sleep but also occurs in the wake state.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Sleep spindles in early development may not only serve the consolidation of specific memories but also advance the development of the memory system in general.

    “Accordingly, sleep spindles in early development may not only serve the consolidation of specific memories but also to advance the development of the memory system in general.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Rather than enhancing storage of the contextual information per se, this feedback might primarily serve to frame and gate processing within cortical long-term stores, for example, when it comes to merging experiences obtained across similar contexts and establishing generalized representations.

    “Importantly, rather than enhancing storage of the contextual information per se, this feedback might primarily serve to frame and gate processing within cortical long-term stores, for example, when it comes to merging experiences obtained across similar contexts and establishing generalized representations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Given the similarity of replay during wake and sleep, sleep replay may basically be considered a further recapitulation of experience encoded and rehearsed during wakefulness, thus further stabilizing respective representations.

    “Given the similarity of replay during wake and sleep, sleep replay may basically be considered a further recapitulation of experience encoded and rehearsed during wakefulness, thus further stabilizing respective representations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    It is the milieu in which replay occurs that makes consolidation in sleep and wake states distinct, comprising brain oscillatory activity and neurotransmitters and neuromodulators such as acetylcholine, noradrenaline, and glucocorticoids, which are subject to brain-state-specific regulation and implicated in consolidation and plasticity at the synaptic level.

    “It is, thus, the milieu in which the replay occurs that makes consolidation in the two brain states distinct, comprising not only brain oscillatory activity and events but also neurotransmitters and neuromodulators, such as acetylcholine, noradrenaline, and glucocorticoids, which are subject to a brain-state-specific regulation and, moreover, are implicated in consolidation and plasticity at the s”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    Promoted through the depolarizing effects originating from cortical SO upstates, ripples emerging phase-locked to spindle oscillations may provide a mechanism to immediately feedback the reinstated contextual information into thalamocortical networks for an integrative processing of newly encoded and pre-existing memory.

    “Promoted through the depolarizing effects originating from cortical SO upstates, ripples emerging phase-locked to spindle oscillations may then provide a mechanism to immediately feedback the reinstated contextual information into thalamocortical networks for an integrative processing of newly encoded and pre-existing memory.294”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [294] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The stabilizing effect of replay during sleep might be particularly strong as it occurs in the absence of interfering stimulation and is further increased as it occurs time-locked to SO-spindle events and bursts of activity in the LC-NA system, as well as by unknown factors that spare underlying synaptic consolidation processes from being down-scaled during SWS and REM sleep.

    “The stabilizing effect of replay during sleep might be particularly strong as it occurs in the absence of interfering stimulation and is further increased as it occurs time-locked to SO-spindle events and bursts of activity in the LC-NA system, as well as by unknown factors that spare underlying synaptic consolidation processes from being down-scaled during SWS and REM sleep.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    SOs and spindles do not contribute to consolidation during wakefulness, as these oscillatory events hallmark the state of sleep.

    “Obviously, SOs and spindles do not contribute to consolidation during wakefulness, as these oscillatory events hallmark the state of sleep.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
129 of 129
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Freshly encoded memory engrams rapidly decay unless they are consolidated.

    “It is generally assumed that freshly encoded memory engrams rapidly decay unless they are consolidated.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Sleep-dependent consolidation is established in the hippocampus-dependent episodic memory system.

    “The concept assumes that sleep-dependent consolidation is established in the hippocampus-dependent episodic memory system.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Consolidation during sleep leads to a reorganization of the memory representation.

    “The proposal is based on the assumption that consolidation during sleep leads to a reorganization of the memory representation”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The underlying neuron ensembles are synaptically connected.

    “Assuming that the underlying neuron ensembles are synaptically connected”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    During the wake phase, information is encoded into synaptic networks, which leads to widespread potentiation of excitatory glutamatergic synapses.

    “The SHY assumes that during the wake phase, information is encoded into synaptic networks, which leads to the widespread potentiation of excitatory glutamatergic synapses.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    An ongoing uptake of information with extended periods of wakefulness would eventually produce saturation in synaptic networks impairing further encoding of information.

    “An ongoing uptake of information with extended periods of wakefulness would, thus, eventually produce saturation in the synaptic networks impairing further encoding of information.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Potentiation of synapses during wake encoding of information is expected to foster structural growth of synaptic spines and functional changes, i.e., increases in AMPA-type glutamate receptors, and therefore to increase synaptic energy demands.

    “Moreover, the potentiation of synapses during wake encoding of information is expected to foster structural growth of synaptic spines and functional changes, i.e., increases in a-amino-3-hydroxy-5methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA)-type glutamate receptors, and therefore to increase synaptic energy demands.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    In order to enable continuing effective encoding of information and to keep space and energy demands of the brain balanced, synaptic networks potentiated during the wake phase need to be re-normalized, and according to SHY, this is established during sleep.

    “Thus, in order to enable continuing effective encoding of information and to keep space and energy demands of the brain balanced, synaptic networks potentiated during the wake phase need to be re-normalized, and according to SHY, this is established during sleep.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Memory is represented in a dendritic-branch-specific manner.

    “Assuming a dendritic-branch-specific representation of memory, local synaptic scaling processes during sleep may well contribute to the reorganization of these memories by changing the topographical distribution of synapses along the dendritic tree.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The formation of long-term memory, and the putatively underlying machinery of an active systems consolidation process, represents a major function of sleep.

    “Assuming that the formation of longterm memory, and the putatively underlying machinery of an active systems consolidation process, represents a major function of sleep, one would expect that the early development of the brain state of sleep proceeds tightly interlinked with that of the relevant memory systems.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The hippocampal-neocortical dialog underlying sleep-dependent systems consolidation is mediated through a triple coupling between hippocampal ripples, spindles, and neocortical SO.

    “Assuming that the hippocampal-neocortical dialog underlying sleep-dependent systems consolidation is mediated through a triple coupling between hippocampal ripples, spindles, and neocortical SO, more recent studies have focused on the phase-locking between these oscillatory events.”
11 of 11

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Two different frequency limits are given for slow oscillations

    Minor

    The main text defines slow oscillations as below 1 Hz, while Figure 2 defines them as below 0.1 Hz. These give different upper limits for the same named rhythm.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brodt, S., Inostroza, M., Niethard, N., & Born, J.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics (DE)
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-04
Volume
111
Issue
7
Pages
1050-1075
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4362638468
Cited by
343
References
299
Citations by year
2026: 98 · 2025: 116 · 2024: 100 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 2
FWCI
12.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG in 279/1-1)
  • European Research Council
  • ERC
  • Hertie Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
sleep-dependent memory consolidation, memory replay, hippocampal replay, slow-wave sleep, REM sleep, ripples, noradrenergic activity, synaptic homeostasis, synaptic scaling, episodic memory, schema formation, memory transformation, hippocampal development
MeSH terms
Memory Consolidation, Sleep, Slow-Wave, Hippocampus, Sleep, Memory, Long-Term

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review