Cited by 4Sleep and related disordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesObstructive Sleep Apnea Research

Improving mental health and daytime function in adult insomnia patients predict cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia effectiveness: A case-control study

Open access
Shin, Jung-Won, Kim, Seonyeop, Park, Bomi, Shin, Yoon Jung, Park, Sunyoung·2023·Sleep Medicine: X

Abstract

This study investigated demographic, sleep related symptoms and mental health status as predictors of clinically significant treatment responses to cognitive behavioral therapy in adults who have good adherence for the cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) program in primary insomnia. A total of 42 adults with primary insomnia disorder were treated with CBT-I at a university hospital from June 2020 to January 2021. Demographic variables were surveyed and sleep-related symptoms were measured using self-reported questionnaires before and after the intervention, comprising a 6-week interval. The treatment responder group was defined as patients with an Insomnia Severity Index change score >7 compared to baseline. Logistic regression and paired t-test examined whether these factors predicted treatment outcomes for CBT-I. Demographic variables did not predict treatment outcomes. Higher levels of anxiety were associated with a higher likelihood of treatment response (odds ratio [OR] = 1.234; confidence interval [CI]: 1.008–1.511). More severe insomnia at baseline was associated with a greater likelihood of treatment response (OR = 1.450; CI: 1.121–1.875). The lesser the dysfunctional beliefs and attitudes about sleep, the more effective the treatment response (OR = 0.943; CI: 0.904–0.984). Unlike the group of treatment responders, daytime function, depressive mood, and anxiety status did not improve in the group of treatment non-responders after CBT-I intervention. Patients with severe insomnia and anxiety at baseline should be treated more aggressively with CBT-I. During treatment, patients’ mental health problems and daytime activities should be continuously monitored, in order to help improve these problems which might strengthen the effectiveness of CBT-I.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sleepx.2023.100071

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shin, J.-W., Kim, S., Park, B., Shin, Y. J., & Park, S.
Affiliations
  • CHA University Bundang Medical Center (KR)
  • CHA University (KR)
Corresponding author
Shin, Jung-Won
Venue
Sleep Medicine: X
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-12
Volume
5
Pages
100071
ISSN
2590-1427 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4362510573
Cited by
4
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sleep Medicine X (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, primary insomnia, treatment response prediction, anxiety, insomnia severity, dysfunctional beliefs about sleep, daytime functioning, depressive mood, mental health, medication adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review