Cited by 29Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and related disordersGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Is there an association between daytime napping, cognitive function, and brain volume? A Mendelian randomization study in the UK Biobank

Open access
Paz, Valentina, Dashti, Hassan S., Garfield, Victoria·2023·Sleep Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Daytime napping has been associated with cognitive function and brain health in observational studies. However, it remains elusive whether these associations are causal. Using Mendelian randomization, we studied the relationship between habitual daytime napping and cognition and brain structure. METHODS: Data were from UK Biobank (maximum n = 378,932 and mean age = 57 years). Our exposure (daytime napping) was instrumented using 92 previously identified genome-wide, independent genetic variants (single-nucleotide polymorphisms, SNPs). Our outcomes were total brain volume, hippocampal volume, reaction time, and visual memory. Inverse-variance weighted was implemented, with sensitivity analyses (Mendelian randomization-Egger and Weighted Median Estimator) for horizontal pleiotropy. We tested different daytime napping instruments to ensure the robustness of our results. RESULTS: and 95% CI = -0.13;0.06), reaction time (expß = 1.01 and 95% CI = 1.00;1.03), or visual memory (expß = 0.99 and 95% CI = 0.94;1.05). Additional analyses with 47 SNPs (adjusted for excessive daytime sleepiness), 86 SNPs (excluding sleep apnea), and 17 SNPs (no sample overlap with UK Biobank) were largely consistent with our main findings. No evidence of horizontal pleiotropy was found. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest a modest causal association between habitual daytime napping and larger total brain volume. Future studies could focus on the associations between napping and other cognitive or brain outcomes and replication of these findings using other datasets and methods.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sleh.2023.05.002

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A UKB MR study found a small association between habitual napping and higher brain volume (unstandardized ß 15.80 cm3, 0.25-31.34) but no difference in hippocampal volume or cognitive tests.

    “A UKB MR study found a small association between habitual napping and higher brain volume (unstandardized ß 15.80 cm 3 , 0.25- 31.34) but no difference in hippocampal volume or cognitive tests.(307)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. [1]Dhand R, Sohal H. Good sleep, bad sleep! The role of daytime naps in healthy adults. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2006; 12: 379– 382. 17053484
  2. [2]Milner CE, Cote KA. Benefits of napping in healthy adults: impact of nap length, time of day, age, and experience with napping. J Sleep Res 2009; 18: 272– 281. 19645971
  3. [3]Zhang Z, Xiao X, Ma W, Li J. Napping in Older Adults: a Review of Current Literature. Curr Sleep Med Rep 2020; 6: 129– 135. 33777656 PMC7992388
  4. [4]Kocevska D, Lysen TS, Dotinga A, Koopman-Verhoeff ME, Luijk MPCM, Antypa N Sleep characteristics across the lifespan in 1.1 million people from the Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nat Hum Behav 2021; 5: 113– 122. 33199855
  5. [5]Lovato N, Lack L. The effects of napping on cognitive functioning. In: Kerkhof GA, Dongen HPA van (eds). Progress in Brain Research. Elsevier, 2010, pp 155– 166. 21075238
  6. [6]Leong RLF, Lo JC, Chee MWL. Systematic review and meta-analyses on the effects of afternoon napping on cognition. Sleep Med Rev 2022; 65: 101666. 36041284
  7. [7]Cai H, Su N, Li W, Li X, Xiao S, Sun L. Relationship between afternoon napping and cognitive function in the ageing Chinese population. Gen Psychiatry 2021; 34: e100361. PMC7839842 33585792
  8. [8]Blazer DG, Yaffe K, Karlawish J. Cognitive Aging: A Report From the Institute of Medicine. JAMA 2015; 313: 2121– 2122. 25875498
  9. [9]Hu C, Yu D, Sun X, Zhang M, Wang L, Qin H. The prevalence and progression of mild cognitive impairment among clinic and community populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Psychogeriatr 2017; 29: 1595– 1608. 28884657
  10. [10]Ritchie SJ, Dickie DA, Cox SR, Valdes Hernandez M del C, Corley J, Royle NA Brain volumetric changes and cognitive ageing during the eighth decade of life. Hum Brain Mapp 2015; 36: 4910– 4925. 26769551 PMC4832269
  11. [11]Vibha D, Tiemeier H, Mirza SS, Adams HHH, Niessen WJ, Hofman A Brain Volumes and Longitudinal Cognitive Change: A Population-based Study. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2018; 32: 43– 49. 29278559
  12. [12]Smith GD, Ebrahim S. ‘Mendelian randomization’: can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease? Int J Epidemiol 2003; 32: 1– 22. 12689998
  13. [13]Henry A, Katsoulis M, Masi S, Fatemifar G, Denaxas S, Acosta D The relationship between sleep duration, cognition and dementia: a Mendelian randomization study. Int J Epidemiol 2019; 48: 849– 860. 31062029 PMC6659373
  14. [14]Andrews SJ, Fulton-Howard B, O’Reilly P, Marcora E, Goate AM. Causal Associations Between Modifiable Risk Factors and the Alzheimer’s Phenome. Ann Neurol 2021; 89: 54– 65. 32996171 PMC8088901
  15. [15]Grover S, International Age-related Macular Degeneration Consortium (IAMDGC), Sharma M Sleep, pain, and neurodegeneration: A Mendelian randomization study. Neurology, 2021 doi: 10.1101/2021.03.08.21253133. PMC9108392 35585838 · DOI
  16. [16]Cullell N, Cárcel-Márquez J, Gallego-Fábrega C, Muiño E, Llucià-Carol L, Lledós M Sleep/wake cycle alterations as a cause of neurodegenerative diseases: A Mendelian randomization study. Neurobiol Aging 2021; 106: 320.e1– 320.e12. 34130902
  17. [17]Zhang G, Zhang L, Xia K, Zhuang Z, Huang T, Fan D. Daytime sleepiness might increase the risk of ALS: a 2-sample Mendelian randomization study. J Neurol 2021; 268: 4332– 4339. 33914140
  18. [18]Anderson EL, Richmond RC, Jones SE, Hemani G, Wade KH, Dashti HS Is disrupted sleep a risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease? Evidence from a two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis. Int J Epidemiol 2021; 50: 817– 828. 33150399 PMC8271193
  19. [19]Sudlow C, Gallacher J, Allen N, Beral V, Burton P, Danesh J UK Biobank: An Open Access Resource for Identifying the Causes of a Wide Range of Complex Diseases of Middle and Old Age. PLOS Med 2015; 12: e1001779. 25826379 PMC4380465
  20. [20]Bycroft C, Freeman C, Petkova D, Band G, Elliott LT, Sharp K The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data. Nature 2018; 562: 203– 209. 30305743 PMC6786975
  21. [21]Lyall DM, Cullen B, Allerhand M, Smith DJ, Mackay D, Evans J Cognitive Test Scores in UK Biobank: Data Reduction in 480,416 Participants and Longitudinal Stability in 20,346 Participants. PLOS ONE 2016; 11: e0154222. 27110937 PMC4844168
  22. [22]Littlejohns TJ, Holliday J, Gibson LM, Garratt S, Oesingmann N, Alfaro-Almagro F The UK Biobank imaging enhancement of 100,000 participants: rationale, data collection, management and future directions. Nat Commun 2020; 11: 2624. 32457287 PMC7250878
  23. [23]Dashti HS, Daghlas I, Lane JM, Huang Y, Udler MS, Wang H Genetic determinants of daytime napping and effects on cardiometabolic health. Nat Commun 2021; 12: 900. 33568662 PMC7876146
  24. [24]Burgess S, Thompson SG, CRP CHD Genetics Collaboration. Avoiding bias from weak instruments in Mendelian randomization studies. Int J Epidemiol 2011; 40: 755– 764. 21414999
  25. [25]Burgess S, Bowden J. Integrating summarized data from multiple genetic variants in Mendelian randomization: bias and coverage properties of inverse-variance weighted methods. ArXiv151204486 Stat 2015. http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.04486 (accessed 31 Aug2021). · arXiv
  26. [26]Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Burgess S. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression. Int J Epidemiol 2015; 44: 512– 525. 26050253 PMC4469799
  27. [27]Bowden J, Smith GD, Haycock PC, Burgess S. Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator. Genet Epidemiol 2016; 40: 304– 314. 27061298 PMC4849733
  28. [28]Leng Y, Redline S, Stone KL, Ancoli-Israel S, Yaffe K. Objective napping, cognitive decline, and risk of cognitive impairment in older men. Alzheimers Dement 2019; 15: 1039– 1047. 31227429 PMC6699896
  29. [29]Owen JE, Veasey SC Impact of sleep disturbances on neurodegeneration_ Insight from studies in animal models | Elsevier Enhanced Reader. Neurobiol Dis; 139: 104820. PMC7593848 32087293
  30. [31]Altena E, Vrenken H, Van Der Werf YD, van den Heuvel OA, Van Someren EJW. Reduced Orbitofrontal and Parietal Gray Matter in Chronic Insomnia: A Voxel-Based Morphometric Study. Biol Psychiatry 2010; 67: 182– 185. 19782344
  31. [32]Li M, Yan J, Li S, Wang T, Wen H, Yin Y Altered gray matter volume in primary insomnia patients: a DARTEL-VBM study. Brain Imaging Behav 2018; 12: 1759– 1767. 29411240
  32. [33]Alperin N, Wiltshire J, Lee SH, Ramos AR, Hernandez-Cardenache R, Rundek T Effect of sleep quality on amnestic mild cognitive impairment vulnerable brain regions in cognitively normal elderly individuals. Sleep 2019; 42. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsy254. PMC6424074 30541112 · DOI
  33. [34]Musiek ES, Holtzman DM. Mechanisms Linking Circadian Clocks, Sleep, and Neurodegeneration. Science 2016; 354: 1004– 1008. 27885006 PMC5219881
  34. [35]Hedman AM, van Haren NEM, Schnack HG, Kahn RS, Hulshoff Pol HE. Human brain changes across the life span: A review of 56 longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging studies. Hum Brain Mapp 2012; 33: 1987– 2002. 21915942 PMC6870052
  35. [36]He J, Farias S, Martinez O, Reed B, Mungas D, DeCarli C. Differences in Brain Volume, Hippocampal Volume, Cerebrovascular Risk Factors, and Apolipoprotein E4 Among Mild Cognitive Impairment Subtypes | Dementia and Cognitive Impairment | JAMA Neurology | JAMA Network. 2009; 66. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaneurology/article-abstract/798403 (accessed 28 Feb2023). PMC2909769 19901172
  36. [37]Ryu D-W, Hong YJ, Cho JH, Kwak K, Lee J-M, Shim YS Automated brain volumetric program measuring regional brain atrophy in diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease dementia. Brain Imaging Behav 2022; 16: 2086– 2096. 35697957
  37. [38]Eichenbaum H, Otto T, Cohen NJ. The hippocampus—what does it do? Behav Neural Biol 1992; 57: 2– 36. 1567331
  38. [39]Campabadal A, Segura B, Junque C, Serradell M, Abos A, Uribe C Cortical Gray Matter and Hippocampal Atrophy in Idiopathic Rapid Eye Movement Sleep Behavior Disorder. Front Neurol 2019; 10. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fneur.2019.00312 (accessed 22 Jan2022). PMC6459930 31024418 · DOI
  39. [40]Sforza E, Celle S, Saint-Martin M, Barthélémy JC, Roche F. Hippocampus volume and subjective sleepiness in older people with sleep-disordered breathing: a preliminary report. J Sleep Res 2016; 25: 190– 193. 26662175
  40. [41]Joo EY, Kim H, Suh S, Hong SB. Hippocampal Substructural Vulnerability to Sleep Disturbance and Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Chronic Primary Insomnia: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Morphometry. Sleep 2014; 37: 1189– 1198. 25061247 PMC4098804
  41. [42]Koo DL, Shin J-H, Lim J-S, Seong J-K, Joo EY. Changes in subcortical shape and cognitive function in patients with chronic insomnia. Sleep Med 2017; 35: 23– 26. 28619178
  42. [43]Noh HJ, Joo EY, Kim ST, Yoon SM, Koo DL, Kim D The Relationship between Hippocampal Volume and Cognition in Patients with Chronic Primary Insomnia. J Clin Neurol 2012; 8: 130. 22787497 PMC3391618
  43. [44]Winkelman JW, Benson KL, Buxton OM, Lyoo IK, Yoon S, O’Connor S Lack of hippocampal volume differences in primary insomnia and good sleeper controls: An MRI volumetric study at 3Tesla. Sleep Med 2010; 11: 576– 582. 20466585
  44. [45]Spiegelhalder K, Regen W, Baglioni C, Klöppel S, Abdulkadir A, Hennig J Insomnia Does Not Appear to be Associated With Substantial Structural Brain Changes. Sleep 2013; 36: 731– 737. 23633756 PMC3624828
  45. [46]Fjell AM, Sørensen Ø, Amlien IK, Bartrés-Faz D, Bros DM, Buchmann N Self-reported sleep relates to hippocampal atrophy across the adult lifespan: results from the Lifebrain consortium. Sleep 2020; 43: zsz280. 31738420 PMC7215271
  46. [47]Silva MVF, Loures C de MG, Alves LCV, de Souza LC, Borges KBG, Carvalho M das G. Alzheimer’s disease: risk factors and potentially protective measures. J Biomed Sci 2019; 26: 33. 31072403 PMC6507104
  47. [48]Masa JF, Rubio M, Pérez P, Mota M, de Cos JS, Montserrat JM. Association Between Habitual Naps and Sleep Apnea. Sleep 2006; 29: 6. 17162994
  48. [49]Cross N, Terpening Z, Rogers NL, Duffy SL, Hickie IB, Lewis SJG Napping in older people ‘at risk’ of dementia: relationships with depression, cognition, medical burden and sleep quality. J Sleep Res 2015; 24: 494– 502. 26096839
  49. [50]Liu Y, Peng T, Zhang S, Tang K. The relationship between depression, daytime napping, daytime dysfunction, and snoring in 0.5 million Chinese populations: exploring the effects of socio-economic status and age. BMC Public Health 2018; 18: 759. 29914433 PMC6007059
  50. [51]Rock P, Roiser J, Riedel W, Blackwell A. Rock PL, Roiser JP, Riedel WJ, Blackwell AD. Cognitive impairment in depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Med 2013; 44: 1– 12. 24168753
  51. [52]Slama H, Deliens G, Schmitz R, Peigneux P, Leproult R. Afternoon Nap and Bright Light Exposure Improve Cognitive Flexibility Post Lunch. PLOS ONE 2015; 10: e0125359. 26016658 PMC4446306

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paz, V., Dashti, H. S., & Garfield, V.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de la República de Uruguay (UY)
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing (GB)
Corresponding author
Paz, Valentina
Venue
Sleep Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-10
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
786-793
ISSN
2352-7218 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4381249673
Cited by
29
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5
FWCI
4.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sleep Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Diabetes Research and Wellness Foundation (SCA/01/NCF/22)
  • Universidad de la República Uruguay
  • National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (K99HL153795)
  • Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación (MOV_CA_2020_1_163153)
  • British Heart Foundation (SP/16/6/32726)
  • Programa de Desarrollo de las Ciencias Básicas
  • Comisión Sectorial de Investigación Científica
  • Diabetes UK (15/0005250 - VG)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
daytime napping, cognitive function, total brain volume, hippocampal volume, reaction time, visual memory, causal inference, genetic variants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review