Phylogenetics and the correlates of mammalian sleep: A reappraisal
Abstract
The correlates of mammalian sleep have been investigated previously in at least eight comparative studies in an effort to illuminate the functions of sleep. However, all of these univariate analyses treated each species, or taxonomic Family, as a statistically independent unit, which is invalid due to the phylogenetic relationships among species. Here, we reassess these influential correlates of mammalian sleep using the formal phylogenetic framework of independent contrasts. After controlling for phylogeny using this procedure, the interpretation of many of the correlates changed. For instance, and contrary to previous studies, we found interspecific support for a neurophysiological role for rapid-eye-movement sleep, such as memory consolidation. Also in contrast to previous studies, we did not find comparative support for an energy conservation function for slow-wave sleep. Thus, the incorporation of a phylogenetic control into comparative analyses of sleep yields meaningful differences that affect our understanding of why we sleep.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Evolutionary increases in encephalization are positively associated with sleep time allocated to REM sleep, even when phylogenetic similarity is controlled.
“Evolutionary increases in encephalization are positively associated with sleep time allocated to REM sleep, even when the effects of phylogenetic similarity between species are controlled (e.g., Ref. 725, but see Refs.1077, 1078).”
From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [725]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 104 · Cited by 99
- Authors
- Lesku, J. A., Roth, T. C., Rattenborg, N. C., Amlaner, C. J., & Lima, S. L.
- Affiliations
- Indiana State University (US)
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Lesku, John A.
- Venue
- Sleep Medicine Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 229-244
- ISSN
- 1087-0792 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2030483739
- Cited by
- 99
- References
- 104
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sleep Medicine Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Keywords
- mammalian sleep, sleep function, phylogenetic comparative analysis, independent contrasts, REM sleep, slow-wave sleep, memory consolidation, energy conservation, sleep evolution
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Basal Metabolism, Brain, Ecology, Energy Metabolism, Biological Evolution, Humans, Mammals, Organ Size, Phylogeny, Predatory Behavior, Sleep, Sleep, REM, Species Specificity, Body Mass Index
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review