A wafer-scale etching technique for high aspect ratio implantable MEMS structures
Open accessAbstract
Microsystem technology is well suited to batch fabricate microelectrode arrays, such as the Utah electrode array (UEA), intended for recording and stimulating neural tissue. Fabrication of the UEA is primarily based on the use of dicing and wet etching to achieve high aspect ratio (15:1) penetrating electrodes. An important step in the array fabrication is the etching of electrodes to produce needle-shape electrodes with sharp tips. Traditional etching processes are performed on a single array, and the etching conditions are not optimized. As a result, the process leads to variable geometries of electrodes within an array. Furthermore, the process is not only time consuming but also labor-intensive. This report presents a wafer-scale etching method for the UEA. The method offers several advantages, such as substantial reduction in the processing time, higher throughput and lower cost. More importantly, the method increases the geometrical uniformity from electrode to electrode within an array (1.5 ± 0.5 % non-uniformity), and from array to array within a wafer (2 ± 0.3 % non-uniformity). Also, the etching rate of silicon columns, produced by dicing, are studied as a function of temperature, etching time and stirring rate in a nitric acid rich HF-HNO(3) solution. These parameters were found to be related to the etching rates over the ranges studied and more-importantly affect the uniformity of the etched silicon columns. An optimum etching condition was established to achieve uniform shape electrode arrays on wafer-scale.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The plasma etching deinsulation process can be carried out on individual electrode arrays or, for microelectrode arrays with uniform electrode lengths, on the wafer scale.
“This process can be carried out on individual electrode arrays [13] or-for microelectrode arrays that have uniform electrode lengths-on the wafer scale [24].”
From A new high-density (25 electrodes/mm<sup>2</sup>) penetrating microelectrode array for recording and stimulating sub-millimeter neuroanatomical structures (2013) · cites this paper as [24]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 71
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [10]Bhandari R Negi S Reith L Solzbacher F Wafer-scale Processed, Low Impedance Neural Arrays with Variable Length Microelectrodes to appear in Proceedings of Transducers ’09 Denver, USA June 21-25, 2009
- Authors
- Bhandari, R., Negi, S., Rieth, L., & Solzbacher, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Utah (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bhandari, R.
- Venue
- Sensors and Actuators A: Physical
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 162
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 130-136
- ISSN
- 0924-4247 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2917827
- OpenAlex
- W1974894886
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 3.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- Sensors and Actuators A Physical (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (HHSN265200423621C)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
- Keywords
- Utah electrode array, high aspect ratio electrodes, neural recording electrodes, neural stimulation electrodes, etch rate, batch fabrication, MEMS
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review