Cited by 59

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in patients with NASH-related cirrhosis: A case-matched study

Rebibo, Lionel, Gerin, Olivier, Verhaeghe, Pierre, Dhahri, Abdennaceur, Cosse, Cyril, Regimbeau, Jean-Marc·2014·Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases

Abstract

Background Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is a validated procedure for the surgical treatment of morbid obesity. Cirrhosis is often considered a relative contraindication to elective extrahepatic surgery. The objective of this study was to evaluate the morbidity related to SG performed in cirrhotic patients compared with noncirrhotic patients. Methods Between March 2004 and January 2013, we included all patients with cirrhosis undergoing SG (13 patients). These patients (SG-cirrhosis group) were matched in terms of preoperative data (age, gender, body mass index, and co-morbidities) on a 1:2 basis, with 26 noncirrhotic patients (SG group) selected from a population of 750 patients. Cirrhosis was diagnosed postoperatively on histologic exam. The primary endpoint was the overall postoperative complication rate. Secondary endpoints were operating time, revisional surgery rate, gastric fistula and bleeding rates, postoperative mortality, and weight loss over a 24-month period. Results The SG-cirrhosis group consisted of 13 patients with a median age of 52 years. All patients in the SG-cirrhosis group were Child A. Etiology of cirrhosis was related to NASH in 93.3%. Median operating time in the SG-cirrhosis group and SG group was 75 minutes versus 80 minutes (P = .59). No postoperative mortality was observed in either group. The overall postoperative complication rate was 7.7% versus 7.7% (P = 1). The major complication rate was 0% versus 7.7% (P = .22), and the postoperativ…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.soard.2013.09.015

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a small case-control study, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in 13 patients with cirrhosis matched to 26 non-cirrhotic patients showed no postoperative mortality in either group and complication rates did not differ between cirrhotic versus non-cirrhotic patients.

    “A small case‐control study has even investigated the effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in 13 patients with cirrhosis that were matched to 26 non‐cirrhotic patients: no postoperative mortality was seen in either group and complication rates did not differ between cirrhotic versus non‐cirrhotic patients [70].”

    From Current treatment of non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (2022) · cites this paper as [70]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rebibo, L., Gerin, O., Verhaeghe, P., Dhahri, A., Cosse, C., & Regimbeau, J.-M.
Venue
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
405-410
ISSN
1550-7289
Cited by
59
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review