Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 944

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Standardized outcomes reporting in metabolic and bariatric surgery

Brethauer, Stacy A., Kim, Julie, el Chaar, Maher, Papasavas, Pavlos, Eisenberg, Dan, Rogers, Ann, Ballem, Naveen, Kligman, Mark, Kothari, Shanu·2015·Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.soard.2015.02.003

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Tayyem, 2011, Analysis of health-related quality-of-life instruments measuring the impact of bariatric surgery: systematic review of the instruments used and their content validity, Patient, 4, 73, 10.2165/11584660-000000000-00000 · DOI
  2. Brazier, 1992, Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care., BMJ Br Med J, 305, 160, 10.1136/bmj.305.6846.160 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Brooks, 1996, EuroQol: the current state of play, Health Policy, 37, 53, 10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Eypasch, 1995, Gastrointestinal Quality of Life index: development, validation and application of a new instrument, Br J Surg, 82, 216, 10.1002/bjs.1800820229 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Karlsson, 2003, Psychosocial functioning in the obese before and after weight reduction: construct validity and responsiveness of the Obesity-related Problems scale, Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord, 27, 617, 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802272 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Kolotkin, 1997, Construct validity of the impact of weight on Quality of Life Questionnaire, Obes Res, 5, 434, 10.1002/j.1550-8528.1997.tb00667.x · DOI
  7. Kolotkin, 1995, Assessing impact of weight on quality of life, Obes Res, 3, 49, 10.1002/j.1550-8528.1995.tb00120.x · DOI · Paper page
  8. Oria, 1998, Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS), Obes Surg, 8, 487, 10.1381/096089298765554043 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Oria, 2009, Updated Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS), Surg Obes Relat Dis, 5, 60, 10.1016/j.soard.2008.10.004 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Moorehead, 2003, The validation of the Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II, Obes Surg, 13, 684, 10.1381/096089203322509237 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Niero, 2002, A new approach to multicultural item generation in the development of two obesity-specific measures: the Obesity and Weight Loss Quality of Life (OWLQOL) Questionnaire and the Weight-Related Symptom Measure (WRSM), Clin Therap, 24, 690, 10.1016/S0149-2918(02)85144-X · DOI
  12. Patrick, 2004, Performance of two self-report measures for evaluating obesity and weight loss, Obes Res, 12, 48, 10.1038/oby.2004.8 · DOI
  13. Mathias, 1997, Assessing health-related quality-of-life and health state preference in persons with obesity: a validation study, Qual Life Res, 6, 311, 10.1023/A:1018475108460 · DOI
  14. Mannucci, 2010, Clinical and psychological correlates of health-related quality of life in obese patients, Health Qual Life Outcomes, 8, 90, 10.1186/1477-7525-8-90 · DOI
  15. Mannucci, 1999, Quality of life and overweight: the Obesity Related Well-Being (Orwell 97) Questionnaire, Addict Behav, 24, 345, 10.1016/S0306-4603(98)00055-0 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Ryden, 2001, Obesity-related coping and distress and relationship to treatment preference, Br J Clin Psychol, 40, 10.1348/014466501163625 · doi:10.1348/014466501163625
  17. Butler, 1999, The Obesity Adjustment Survey: development of a scale to assess psychological adjustment to morbid obesity, Int J Obes Relat Metabol Dis, 23, 505, 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800850 · DOI
  18. Le Pen, 1998, "Specific" scale compared with "generic" scale: a double measurement of the quality of life in a French community sample of obese subjects, J Epidemiol Community Health, 52, 445, 10.1136/jech.52.7.445 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 944

Metadata

Authors
Brethauer, S. A., Kim, J., el Chaar, M., Papasavas, P., Eisenberg, D., Rogers, A., Ballem, N., Kligman, M., & Kothari, S.
Venue
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
489-506
ISSN
1550-7289 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1551222890
Cited by
944
References
5
FWCI
49.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Standardized outcomes reporting in metabolic and bariatric surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.soard.2015.02.003
The paper
Brethauer, S. A., Kim, J., el Chaar, M., Papasavas, P., Eisenberg, D., Rogers, A., Ballem, N., Kligman, M., & Kothari, S. (2015). Standardized outcomes reporting in metabolic and bariatric surgery. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2015.02.003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.